1 材料与方法
1.1 材料
1.2 方法
表1 不同处理及营养液配方Tab. 1 Different treatments and nutrient solution formula mL·L-1 |
| 处理 Treatments | CK | N | A | AN | CK+IMI | N+IMI | A+IMI | AN+IMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 mol·L-1 (NH4)2SO4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 1 mol·L-1 KNO3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 1 mol·L-1 Ca(NO3)2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 mol·L-1 KCl | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 1 mol·L-1 CaCl2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| 1 mol·L-1 KH2PO4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 mol·L-1 MgSO4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 7 mmol·L-1 C2H4N4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 微量元素 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 铁盐 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 5 mg·L-1吡虫啉 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
注:营养液中微量元素组成:46.26 μmol·L-1 H3BO3、9.15 μmol·L-1 MnCl2·4H2O、0.32 μmol·L-1 CuSO4·5H2O、0.77 μmol·L-1 ZnSO4·7H2O、0.39 μmol·L-1 (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O,铁盐的终浓度为20.0 µmol·L-1。 | |
Note: The concentration of trace elements in nutrient solution: 46.26 μmol·L-1 H3BO3, 9.15 μmol·L-1 MnCl2·4H2O, 0.32 μmol·L-1 CuSO4·5H2O, 0.77 μmol·L-1 ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.39 μmol·L-1 (NH4)6Mo7O24 4H2O. Final concentration of iron salt is 20.0 µmol·L-1. |
1.3 数据处理
2 结果与分析
2.1 不同氮素与吡虫啉处理对甘蔗株高和茎径的影响
表2 不同处理下的甘蔗生长情况Tab. 2 Growth of sugarcane under different treatments |
| 处理 Treatments | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎径 Stem diameter/mm |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 77.37±3.28c | 6.62±0.36d |
| A | 212.66±4.33b | 18.07±1.21a |
| N | 209.00±19.50b | 14.46±1.22bc |
| AN | 211.67±2.97b | 14.80±0.94bc |
| CK+IMI | 99.67±4.10c | 8.04±0.94d |
| A+IMI | 247.68±5.89a | 17.16±0.64ab |
| N+IMI | 215.00±11.93b | 13.57±0.47c |
| AN+IMI | 213.66±6.93b | 16.70±1.36ab |
注:表中数据均为平均值±标准误,同列数据后不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05,LSD)。 | |
Note: The data in the table are mean±standard errors, and different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference between treatments (P<0.05, LSD). |
2.2 不同形态氮素与吡虫啉处理对甘蔗鲜重的影响
表3 不同处理下甘蔗各部位生物量Tab. 3 Biomass of different parts of sugarcane under different treatments |
| 处理Treatments | 鲜重Fresh weight/g | 根冠比 Root to crown ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 整株Complete plant/g | 地下部Underground/g | 地上部Aboveground/g | ||
| CK | 15.62±1.23e | 6.14±0.88e | 9.49±1.16e | 0.68±0.16a |
| A | 226.08±17.50ab | 25.88±2.25bc | 200.19±16.41ab | 0.13±0.01b |
| N | 160.45±20.98d | 20.83±2.31c | 139.61±19.79d | 0.15±0.02b |
| AN | 172.19±14.25cd | 23.75±2.79bc | 148.44±11.72cd | 0.16±0.01b |
| CK+IMI | 33.48±3.03e | 14.20±1.58d | 19.29±1.46 e | 0.73±0.02a |
| A+IMI | 266.08±14.92a | 34.32±1.28a | 231.76±16.20a | 0.15±0.02b |
| N+IMI | 207.13±10.32bc | 28.19±1.84ab | 178.94±11.04bcd | 0.16±0.02b |
| AN+IMI | 222.86±20.16ab | 34.05±2.83a | 188.82±17.35bc | 0.18±0.01b |
注:表中数据均为平均值±标准误,同列数据后不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05,LSD)。 | |
Note: The data in the table are mean±standard errors, and different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference between treatments (P<0.05, LSD). |
2.3 不同形态氮素与吡虫啉处理对甘蔗根系生长发育的影响
表4 不同形态氮素与吡虫啉处理下甘蔗的根系形态Tab. 4 Root morphology of sugarcane under different nitrogen and imidacloprid treatments |
| 处理Treatments | 根系总长 Total root length/m | 根系表面积 Root surface area/cm2 | 平均直径 Average diameter/mm | 根系体积 Root volume/cm3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 15.27±0.74d | 118.30±4.47e | 0.25±0.01bcd | 0.73±0.05d |
| A | 36.58±3.69c | 312.48±34.74bcd | 0.27±0.01abc | 2.15±0.28bc |
| N | 37.44±2.05c | 285.84±20.41cd | 0.24±0.01cd | 1.76±0.18bc |
| AN | 45.02±2.29bc | 348.75±28.42bc | 0.24±0.01cd | 2.17±0.26bc |
| CK+IMI | 24.65±2.21d | 227.09±21.17d | 0.29±0.03a | 1.69±0.19c |
| A+IMI | 40.85±1.90bc | 298.55±11.92cd | 0.23±0.02d | 1.75±0.06bc |
| N+IMI | 49.77±3.96b | 395.38±36.53b | 0.25±0.01bcd | 2.53±0.28b |
| AN+IMI | 62.94±6.13a | 546.30±56.41a | 0.28±0.02ab | 3.83±0.45a |
注:表中数据均为平均值±标准误,同列数据后不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05,LSD)。 | |
Note: The data in the table are mean±standard errors, and different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference between treatments (P<0.05, LSD). |
