1 材料与方法
1.1 材料与试验设计
1.2 方法
1.3 数据处理
2 结果与分析
2.1 不同甘蔗品种的氮素利用率
表1 不同甘蔗品种的氮素利用率测定结果Tab. 1 Determination of nitrogen use efficiency among different sugarcane varieties |
| 品种 Varieties | 平均每桶甘蔗植株N素累积量 Average N accumulation per barrel of sugarcane plants/g | 甘蔗氮吸收效率 Nitrogen absorption efficiency of sugarcane/% | 氮肥利用率 Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | 合计Total | |||
| ROC22 | 0.24 | 2.40 | 3.03 | 5.67 | 23.61±0.02ab | 29.14±0.02ab |
| Y93159 | 0.16 | 1.47 | 3.44 | 5.07 | 21.12±0.03ab | 26.05±0.03ab |
| B8 | 0.32 | 1.60 | 3.22 | 5.14 | 21.37±0.03ab | 26.41±0.04ab |
| B9 | 0.24 | 1.12 | 2.95 | 4.31 | 17.95±0.02b | 22.15±0.03b |
| GT42 | 0.27 | 1.74 | 4.07 | 6.08 | 25.32±0.08ab | 31.24±0.10ab |
| GT44 | 0.27 | 2.09 | 4.26 | 6.62 | 27.57±0.02a | 34.02±0.02a |
| GT46 | 0.14 | 1.36 | 3.21 | 4.71 | 19.62±0.06ab | 24.2±0.07ab |
| GT48 | 0.12 | 1.35 | 3.32 | 4.79 | 19.93±0.01ab | 24.61±0.01ab |
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference among varieties (P<0.05). | |
注:同列不同小写字母表示品种间差异显著(P<0.05)。 |
2.2 甘蔗收获后根际土壤pH及土壤氮素含量
表2 甘蔗收获后根际土壤pH以及土壤氮素含量测定结果Tab. 2 Determination of pH value and residual nitrogen content of the soil after sugarcane harvesting |
| 品种 Varieties | 甘蔗收获后平均每桶土壤N含量 Average soil N content per barrel after harvesting of sugarcane | pH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 土壤总N含量 Total N content of soil/(g·kg-1) | 碱解N含量 The contents of available N/ (mg·kg-1) | ||
| CK (种植前土壤) | - | 228.20±0.00a | 6.89±0.05c |
| ROC22 | 2.30±0.12b | 153.92±5.73c | 7.54±0.03b |
| Y93159 | 2.45±0.26ab | 167.62±18.67bc | 7.53±0.05b |
| B8 | 2.87±0.43a | 195.40±9.62ab | 7.69±0.05a |
| B9 | 2.52±0.19ab | 181.27±13.93abc | 7.65±0.05ab |
| GT42 | 2.30±0.04b | 195.10±17.11ab | 7.71±0.03a |
| GT44 | 2.26±0.07b | 153.22±26.59c | 7.53±0.07b |
| GT46 | 2.27±0.01b | 189.87±20.01abc | 7.62±0.02ab |
| GT48 | 2.23±0.02b | 179.06±13.79bc | 7.59±0.05ab |
Note: - Indicates that no testing has been done. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference among varieties (P<0.05). | |
注:-表示未检测;同列不同小写字母表示品种间差异显著(P<0.05)。 |
2.3 不同甘蔗品种根际土壤酶活性
表3 不同甘蔗品种根际土壤酶活性Tab. 3 Enzyme activity in rhizosphere soil of different sugarcane varieties |
| 品种 Varieties | 蔗糖酶活性 Invertase activity/ (mg·g-1·d-1) | 脲酶活性 Urease activity/ (mg·g-1·d-1) |
|---|---|---|
| ROC22 | 5.80±0.70a | 1.42±0.14a |
| Y93159 | 3.51±0.18d | 1.19±0.03bc |
| B8 | 5.55±0.16ab | 1.25±0.03abc |
| B9 | 5.48±0.12ab | 1.29±0.02abc |
| GT42 | 4.43±0.49bcd | 1.12±0.06c |
| GT44 | 4.89±0.37abc | 1.23±0.04bc |
| GT46 | 3.73±0.39cd | 1.25±0.02abc |
| GT48 | 6.06±0.71a | 1.32±0.04ab |
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference among varieties (P<0.05). | |
注:同列不同小写字母表示品种间差异显著(P<0.05)。 |
2.4 不同甘蔗品种根际土壤细菌种群的多样性分析
表4 甘蔗根际土壤样品测序基本信息统计Tab. 4 Statistical for sequencing basic information of sugarcane rhizosphere soil samples |
| 品种 Varieties | 序列数 Seq_num | 碱基数 Base_num | 平均长度Mean_length | 最短序列长度Min_length | 最长序列长度Max_length | 文库覆盖率 Coverage/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROC22 | 64 267 | 27975 572 | 435 | 306 | 488 | 99.43 |
| Y93159 | 58 049 | 25295 519 | 436 | 275 | 486 | 99.37 |
| GT42 | 46 211 | 20092 974 | 435 | 276 | 498 | 98.99 |
| GT44 | 53 680 | 23450 649 | 437 | 268 | 554 | 99.16 |
| GT46 | 46 162 | 20051 873 | 434 | 237 | 470 | 99.06 |
| GT48 | 46 439 | 20201 787 | 435 | 277 | 473 | 99.26 |
| B8 | 43 070 | 18779 749 | 436 | 275 | 473 | 99.29 |
| B9 | 45 772 | 19892 101 | 435 | 315 | 474 | 99.19 |
表5 不同甘蔗品种根际土壤样品测序结果各分类单元数量及Alpha多样性分析Tab. 5 Analysis of the number of taxa and alpha diversity in rhizosphere soil samples of different sugarcane varieties |
| 品种Varieties | OTU | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Chao | Shannon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROC22 | 1362 | 35 | 72 | 142 | 257 | 421 | 1454.49a | 6.14a |
| Y93159 | 1316 | 33 | 65 | 134 | 250 | 417 | 1406.59ab | 6.00ab |
| B8 | 1237 | 31 | 64 | 132 | 244 | 396 | 1377.67b | 5.86bc |
| B9 | 1287 | 33 | 67 | 135 | 245 | 401 | 1409.97ab | 6.04ab |
| GT42 | 1273 | 34 | 69 | 137 | 243 | 393 | 1400.10ab | 6.04ab |
| GT44 | 1241 | 31 | 63 | 128 | 241 | 398 | 1350.31b | 5.70c |
| GT46 | 1299 | 33 | 68 | 133 | 243 | 402 | 1365.39b | 6.12a |
| GT48 | 1298 | 34 | 71 | 137 | 248 | 408 | 1402.57ab | 6.11a |
2.5 甘蔗根际土壤细菌群落的主要影响因子分析
图5 不同品种甘蔗氮吸收率和根际土壤理化性质与微生物群落(门水平)的冗余分析图中不同蓝色圆点为样本组(8个不同甘蔗品种);绿色箭头代表物种;红色箭头表示环境影响因子,箭头的长短可以代表环境因子对于物种数据的影响程度。 Fig. 5 Redundancy analysis to explore relationship between microorganism community (phylum) and physiochemical characteristics of sugarcane rhizosphere soils together with the nitrogen absorption efficiency of sugarcane In the figure, the blue dots are the sample groups (8 different sugarcane varieties), and the green arrow represents the species, while the red arrow represents the environmental impact factors; and the length of the arrow can represent the impact of environmental factors on the species data. |
图6 甘蔗氮吸收率和土壤理化性质与土壤微生物群落的相关性分析Heatmap图*表示在0.05水平上显著相关,**表示在0.01水平上显著相关。 Fig.6 The Heatmap of correlation between dominant microorganisms (phylum) and physiochemical characteristics of sugarcane rhizosphere soils together with the nitrogen absorption efficiency of sugarcane * indicates a significant correlation at the 0.05 level, and ** indicates a significant correlation at the 0.01 level. |
