1 材料与方法
1.1 试验处理
1.2 样品采集
1.3 土壤理化性质测定
1.4 样品总DNA提取
1.5 PCR扩增及高通量测序
1.6 数据处理
2 结果与分析
2.1 莲雾园区土壤理化性质
表1 土壤样品的理化性质Tab. 1 Physical and chemical properties of soil samples |
| 处理 Treatments | 全氮 TN/(g·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/(mg·kg-1) | 有机质 Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 含水量 Water content/% | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 1.76±0.04a | 24.22±0.61a | 22.65±0.62a | 31.38±0.72b | 2.15±1.02a | 3.89±0.02abc |
| GML | 1.19±0.09 c | 8.59±0.04c | 9.99±0.47bc | 24.64±0.87d | 1.78±0.98a | 3.93±0.07ab |
| GMM | 1.82±0.09 a | 4.46±0.11de | 10.66±0.67b | 34.43±0.91a | 2.93±1.04a | 3.92±0.08ab |
| GMH | 1.77±0.06a | 3.84±0.06e | 9.33±0.46cd | 34.97±0.60a | 2.88±1.41a | 3.95±0.06a |
| BML | 1.83±0.09 a | 9.26±0.13c | 8.66±0.83d | 32.77±1.08b | 2.48±1.54a | 3.80±0.02c |
| BMM | 1.46±0.04 b | 5.01±0.12d | 6.66±0.32e | 25.05±0.75d | 1.67±1.12a | 3.83±0.03bc |
| BMH | 1.58±0.05 b | 17.43±1.07b | 7.33±0.07e | 29.62±0.77c | 2.98±1.09a | 3.85±0.08abc |
注:同列数据不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。 | |
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column mean significant difference (P<0.05). |
2.2 莲雾园区土壤细菌群落OTU及多样性分析
表2 土壤样品中细菌群落相对丰度与多样性指数Tab. 2 Bacterial community richness and diversity indices of soil samples |
| 处理 Treatments | 有效序列数 Sequence number | 操作分类 单元OTU | ACE指数 ACE index | Chao1指数 Chao1 index | Shannon-Wiener指数 Shannon-Wiener index | Simpson指数 Simpson index | 覆盖率 Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 31 172a | 1425c | 1741.00±56.93c | 1762.00±69.94b | 5.5900±0.1277bc | 0.0121±0.0007c | 0.9883±0.0017ab |
| GML | 35 977a | 1613a | 1939.33±20.03a | 1911.67±18.77a | 5.8100±0.0100a | 0.0097±0.0002de | 0.9893±0.0014ab |
| GMM | 37 546a | 1611a | 1961.33±40.15a | 1975.33±76.74a | 5.6533±0.0586bc | 0.0116±0.0009cd | 0.9893±0.0011ab |
| GMH | 32 497a | 1518b | 1878.33±92.12ab | 1873.67±91.54ab | 5.5533±0.0321c | 0.0145±0.0014ab | 0.9878±0.0010b |
| BML | 35 089a | 1635a | 1968.33±29.01a | 1969.67±69.34a | 5.7933±0.0666a | 0.0093±0.0010e | 0.9886±0.0023ab |
| BMM | 38 427a | 1507bc | 1796.33±32.13bc | 1780.00±55.51b | 5.5133±0.1060c | 0.0154±0.0010a | 0.9909±0.0005a |
| BMH | 36 422a | 1617a | 1937.67±15.01a | 1970.00±20.22a | 5.7033±0.0551ab | 0.0133±0.0018bc | 0.9892±0.0022ab |
注:相似性水平为97%;同列数据不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。 | |
Note: Similarity level is 97%; Different lowercase letters in the same column mean significant difference (P<0.05). |
2.3 莲雾园区土壤细菌群落结构组成分析
2.4 莲雾园区土壤细菌群落空间差异物种(Biomarker)分析
图4 3种处理组的细菌群落空间差异物种LEfSe分析LDA值分布柱状图Fig. 4 Distribution histogram of LDA value of LEfSe analysis of bacterial community spatial differences among three different treatment groups |
图5 3种处理组的细菌群落空间差异物种LEfSe分析进化分枝图分枝中绿色节点表示在CK组中起到重要作用的微生物类群;红色节点表示在BM组中起到重要作用的微生物类群;蓝色节点表示在GM组中起到重要作用的微生物类群;黄色节点表示在3种不同组中均没有起到重要作用的微生物类群。 Fig. 5 Evolutionary branching map of LEfSe analysis of bacterial community spatial differences among three different treatment groups The green nodes in the branches indicate the microbial groups that play an important role in the CK group; The red nodes in the branches indicate the microbial groups that play an important role in BM group; The blue nodes in the branches indicate the microbial groups that play an important role in the GM Group; The yellow nodes in the branches indicate the microbial groups that do not play an important role in the three groups. |
