1 材料与方法
1.1 材料
1.2 方法
1.3 数据处理
2 结果与分析
2.1 钾镁胁迫对花药苗生长发育的影响
图2 不同钾镁胁迫条件下橡胶树花药苗的株高和茎粗柱上不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05);*和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平差异显著或极显著,ns表示不显著。 Fig. 2 Plant height and stem diameter of rubber tree seedling under different levels of potassium and magnesium deficiency Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant difference among treatments at P<0.05; * and ** indicate significant difference or extremely significant difference at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively, “ns” indicates not significant difference. |
2.2 钾镁胁迫对花药苗叶绿素含量的影响
图3 不同钾镁胁迫条件下橡胶树花药苗的叶绿素参数柱上不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05);*和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平差异显著或极显著,ns表示不显著。 Fig. 3 Photosynthetic pigment in leaves of rubber tree seedling under potassium and magnesium deficiency Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant difference among treatments at P<0.05; * and ** indicate significant difference or extremely significant difference at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively, “ns” indicates not significant difference. |
2.3 钾镁胁迫对花药苗各器官钾镁含量的影响
表1 不同钾镁胁迫条件下橡胶树花药苗各器官钾和镁含量及方差分析Tab. 1 Concentrations of potassium and magnesium and their variance analysis in different organs of rubber tree seedling under potassium and magnesium deficiency |
| 处理 Treatment | 钾含量 K concentration/% | 镁含量 Mg concentration/% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 叶 leaf | 茎干 Stem | 茎皮 Stem bark | 叶柄 Petiole | 根 Root | 叶 leaf | 茎干 Stem | 茎皮 Stem bark | 叶柄 Petiole | 根 Root | |
| -K-Mg | 1.020b | 0.911b | 0.991b | 1.451c | 1.140b | 0.190c | 0.104c | 0.195c | 0.158c | 0.075c |
| -K | 1.081b | 0.874b | 1.076b | 1.606c | 1.135b | 0.264a | 0.249a | 0.470a | 0.311a | 0.144a |
| -Mg | 1.582a | 1.530a | 1.605a | 3.023a | 1.526a | 0.179c | 0.100c | 0.179c | 0.142c | 0.058d |
| CK | 1.558a | 1.364a | 1.640a | 2.742b | 1.506a | 0.231b | 0.155b | 0.321b | 0.251b | 0.107b |
| P值(K) | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.002** | 0.016* | 0.000** | 0.002** | 0.012** | 0.000** |
| P值(Mg) | 0.783 | 0.171 | 0.420 | 0.256 | 0.885 | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** |
| P值(K×Mg) | 0.547 | 0.368 | 0.735 | 0.003** | 0.930 | 0.190 | 0.001** | 0.007** | 0.094 | 0.041* |
Note: Values followed by different lowercase letters in the same column are significantly different among the treatments at the 0.05 level; * and ** indicate significant difference or extremely significant difference at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. | |
注: 同列数据后不同小写字母表示施肥处理间差异达5%显著水平;*和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平差异显著或极显著。 |
2.4 钾镁胁迫对花药苗叶片可溶性糖组分的影响
表2 不同钾镁胁迫条件下橡胶树花药苗叶片的糖组分含量及方差分析Tab. 2 Carbohydrates contents in leaves of rubber tree seedling and variance analysis under potassium and magnesium deficiency |
| 处理 Treatment | 葡萄糖 Glucose/% | 蔗糖 Sucrose/% | 果糖 Fructose/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| -K-Mg | 0.77±0.01a | 0.057±0.003b | 1.21±0.07a |
| -K | 0.62±0.04b | 0.044±0.003c | 0.90±0.03c |
| -Mg | 0.57±0.05b | 0.064±0.001a | 1.10±0.04b |
| CK | 0.46±0.05c | 0.049±0.002c | 0.61±0.05d |
| P值(K) | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** |
| P值(Mg) | 0.001** | 0.000** | 0.000** |
| P值(K×Mg) | 0.302ns | 0.580ns | 0.009** |
Note: Values followed by different lowercase letters in the same column are significantly different among the treatments at the 0.05 level; * and ** indicate significant difference or extremely significant difference at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively, “ns” indicates not significant difference. | |
注:同列数据后不同字母表示施肥处理间差异达5%显著水平;*和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平差异显著或极显著,ns表示不显著。 |
2.5 钾镁胁迫对花药苗叶片叶绿体超微结构的影响
图4 不同钾镁胁迫条件下橡胶树花药苗叶片的叶绿体超微结构A:缺钾镁处理;B:缺钾处理;C:缺镁处理;D:对照;Sg:淀粉粒;Pg:嗜饿体;Tl:类囊体片层。 Fig. 4 Chloroplast ultrastructure in leaves of rubber tree seedling under different levels of potassium and magnesium deficiency A: -K-Mg; B: -K; C: -Mg; D: CK; Sg: Starch grannules; Pg: Plastoglobulus; Tl: Thylakoild lamella. |
表3 不同钾镁胁迫条件下橡胶树花药苗叶片的叶绿体结构参数及方差分析Tab. 3 Chloroplast structure in leaves of rubber tree seedling and variance analysis under different levels of potassium and magnesium deficiency |
| 处理 Treatment | 叶绿体长度 Chloroplast length/μm | 叶绿体厚度 Chloroplast thickness/μm | 嗜饿体数 Plastoglobulus number | 淀粉粒数 Starch grannules number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -K-Mg | 4.36±0.23b | 2.38±0.05ab | 1.06±0.15b | 1.23±0.14a |
| -K | 3.69±0.24c | 2.17±0.12b | 2.95±0.14a | 0.00±0.00c |
| -Mg | 4.79±0.29b | 2.59±0.18a | 0.81±0.22b | 1.27±0.34a |
| CK | 5.96±0.53a | 2.23±0.07b | 0.34±0.05c | 0.37±0.15b |
| P值(K) | 0.000** | 0.069ns | 0.000** | 0.110ns |
| P值(Mg) | 0.247ns | 0.003** | 0.000** | 0.000** |
| P值(K×Mg) | 0.002** | 0.278ns | 0.000** | 0.201ns |
Note: Values followed by different lowercase letters in the same column are significantly different among the treatments at the 0.05 level; * and ** indicate significant difference or extremely significant difference at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively, “ns” indicates not significant difference. | |
注:同列数据后不同字母表示施肥处理间差异达5%显著水平;*和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平差异显著或极显著,ns表示不显著。 |
