In this study, four purple rice from Mojiang County (MJ), Xinhua County (HN), Hunan, Liping County (GZ), Guizhou and Hanzhong County (SX), Shaanxi were selected to evaluate the differences in starch, fat, anthocyanins, polyphenols, amino acids and elements between different origins, to determine the relationship among nutrient components, and to compare with red rice and black rice. The nutritional characteristics of the purple rice of different origins were different. Purple rice from HN had the lowest starch content (68.13%), highest fat, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P and Zn elements content, among which Mn (80.37 mg/kg) and Na (10.75 mg/kg) were significantly higher than other origins (P<0.05). Anthocyanins (533.03 mg/kg, 412.54 mg/kg), polyphenols (340.55 mg/100 g, 387.91 mg/100 g) content in purple rice from MJ and SX were significantly higher than those from the other origins (P<0.05), while anthocyanins (156.55 mg/kg) and polyphenols (239.23 mg/100 g) in purple rice from GZ were significantly lower (P<0.05) than those from the other origins. SX purple rice had the highest content of total amino acids (74.37 g/kg) and total essential amino acids (ΣEAA, 26.09 g/kg), which was not significantly different from other purple rice. Correlation analysis between the components of purple rice showed that anthocyanins was positively correlated with polyphenols (0.625), and both were negatively correlated with Ca (-0.571, -0.549), respectively. Asp and Gly were significantly positively correlated with Fe and Ca, respectively, and among most of each elements was significantly positively correlated. Among colored rice, red rice had the highest starch content (74.73%), but the lowes content of anthocyanins (9.05 mg/kg), total amino acids (55.94 g/kg), ΣEAA (19.78 g/kg), Fe (6.51 mg/kg), Mg (609.41 mg/kg), and P (1746.72 mg/kg), which were significantly different with purple rice and black rice (P<0.05). The contents of anthocyanin (533.03 mg/kg) and polyphenols (453.53 mg/100g) of black rice were significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of other colored rice. The difference in amino acid content between black rice and purple rice was not significant (P>0.05), but significantly higher than that of red rice (P<0.05).. The ratio of ΣEAA/ΣNEA was about 0.54 among colored rice. Principal component analysis (PCA) divided the three colored rice into two groups. red rice, purple and black rice. The first three principal components could explain 91% of the total variance. The contribution of the first principal component (PC1) was 67.5%, which represented mineral elements, indicating that the origin was the main reason for the difference in the composition of colored rice. The second principal component (PC2) accounted for 18.2% of the total variance, mainly including total anthocyanin and amino acids.This study could provide some reference for nutritional evaluation of purple rice.