Evaluating the Adaptation of Spodoptera frugiperda to Various Plants in Corn Field via Artificial Diet Method

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2022.12.012

Abstract

Abstract:

Understanding the effects of different host plants on the biological characteristics of herbivorous insects is the basis for the study of insect-plant interactions, and is of great significance for effective pest management strategies. The invasive pest, fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda, may damage plants as many as 353 species, but the effects of most host plants on its biological characteristics are still not clear. Feeding the fresh plant leaves to the larvae of herbivorous insects is the common method, but it is limited by climate, geographical location, plant growth cycle and so on. In this study, Zea mays was used as a reference, and 6 crops and weeds in and around corn fields were collected as experimental materials, including Glycine max, Vigna unguiculata, Ipomoea batatas, Artemisia argyi, Lactuca sativa and Cucumis sativus. The fresh leaves of the above plants were uniformly collected and then ground to powder. The powder of different plants was added to the artificial diets at a ratio of 1%, then was used to feed the larvae of S. frugiperda respectively. The survival (i.e., larval survival rate, pupation rate, eclosion rate), growth (i.e., larval gain weight, pupal weight, relative growth rate), development period (i.e., larval period, prepupal period, pupal period), food utilization (i.e., relative consumption rate, approximate digestibility, efficiency of conversion of ingested food, efficiency of conversion of digested food) were investigated to explore the biological characteristics of S. frugiperda after feeding the above diets. In order to verify the feasibility of the plant leaves powder feed method, the fresh leaves of the above plants were also collected uniformly and fed to the larvae of S. frugiperda respectively. The results showed that G. max and V. unguiculata were the suitable host plants for S. frugiperda. While I. batatas, A. argyi and L. sativa presented negative effects on S. frugiperda, which may reduce the harm to corn when the plants were intercropped with corn. With the help of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a quantitative grading index evaluation system was established to compare the two methods quantitatively. As a result, the effects of diets and fresh leaf feeding were consistent, and the plant leaves powder diet method has few restrictions and easy operation, which is better evaluating the effects of farmland plants on the biological characteristics of S. frugiperda.

Key words: insect-plant interaction, ecologically-based pest management, growth and development, Spodoptera frugiperda

CLC Number:

S435.132

LIAO Huimin, GUO Yeshan, HUANG Zian, WANG Peiyue, YE Yuhan, SHU Yinghua, WANG Jianwu. Evaluating the Adaptation of Spodoptera frugiperda to Various Plants in Corn Field via Artificial Diet Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2022, 43(12): 2496-2506.

Figures/Tables 6

References 40

[1]	PAREDES-SANCHEZ F A, RIVERA G, BOCANEGRA- GARCIA V, MARTINEZ-PADRON H Y, BERRONES- MORALES M, NINO-GARCIA N, HERRERA-MAYORGA V. Advances in control strategies against Spodoptera frugiperda. A review[J]. Molecules, 2021, 26(18): 5587.
[2]	SUN X X, HU C X, JIA H R, WU Q L, SHEN X J, ZHAO S Y, JIANG Y Y, WU K M. Case study on the first immigration of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda invading into China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 664-672.
[3]	XIAO Y T. Research on the invasive pest of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 633-636.
[4]	ZHOU Y, WU Q L, ZHANG H W, WU K M. Spread of invasive migratory pest Spodoptera frugiperda and management practices throughout China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 637-645. DOI
[5]	MONTEZANO D G, SPECHT A, SOSA-GOMEZ D R, ROQUE-SPECHT V F, SOUSA-SILVA J C, PAULA- MORAES S V, PETERSON J A, HUNT T E. Host plants of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the Americas[J]. African Entomology, 2018, 26(2): 286-300.
[6]	JING W, HUANG C, LI C Y, ZHOU H X, REN Y L, LI Z Y, XING L S, ZHANG B, QIAO X, LIU B, LIU C H, XI Y, LIU W X, WANG W K, QIAN W Q, MCKIRDY S, WAN F H. Biology, invasion and management of the agricultural invader: fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 646-663.
[7]	ZHANG D, XIAO Y, XU P, YANG X, WU Q, WU K. Insecticide resistance monitoring for the invasive populations of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 783-791.
[8]	ZHAO Z H, REDDY G V P, HUI C, LI B L. Approaches and mechanisms for ecologically based pest management across multiple scales[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 230: 199-209.
[9]	朱有勇, 骆世明, 尤民生, 李正跃, 卢宝荣, 陈斌, 朱书生, 何霞红, 李成云. 农业作物多样性与作物病虫害控制[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 296.
	ZHU Y Y, LUO S M, YOU M S, LI Z Y, LV B R, CHEN B, ZHU S S, HE X H, LI C Y. Agrobiodiversity and crop pest management[M]. Beijing: Science Publishing, 2013: 296. (in Chinese)
[10]	HARRISON R D, THIERFELDER C, BAUDRON F, CHINWADA P, MIDEGA C, SCHAFFNER U, VAN DEN BERG J. Agro-ecological options for fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith) management: providing low-cost, smallholder friendly solutions to an invasive pest[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 243: 318-330.
[11]	王登杰, 任茂琼, 姜继红, 毕司进, 吴圣勇. 草地贪夜蛾绿色防控技术研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(1): 1-9.
	WANG D J, REN M Q, JIANG J H, BI S J, WU S Y. Research progress on green control technology for management of Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. Plant Protection, 2020, 46(1): 1-9. (in Chinese)
[12]	BAUDRON F, ZAMAN-ALLAH M A, CHAIPA I, CHARI N, CHINWADA P. Understanding the factors influencing fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith) damage in African smallholder maize fields and quantifying its impact on yield. A case study in Eastern Zimbabwe[J]. Crop Protection, 2019, 120: 141-150.
[13]	DE LA ROSA-CANCINO W, ROJAS J C, CRUZ-LOPEZ L, CASTILLO A, MALO E A. Attraction, feeding preference, and performance of Spodoptera frugiperda larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) reared on two varieties of maize[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2016, 45(2): 384-389.
[14]	吕亮, 李雨晴, 陈从良, 常向前, 张舒, 许冬, 万鹏. 草地贪夜蛾幼虫在玉米和小麦上的取食和生长发育特性比较[J]. 昆虫学报, 2020, 63(5): 597-603.
	LYU L, LI Y Q, CHEN C L, CHANG X Q, ZHANG S, XU D, WAN P. Comparison of the feeding and growth characteristics of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on corn and wheat[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2020, 63(5): 597-603. (in Chinese)
[15]	曾凡荣. 昆虫人工饲料研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(2): 184-197.
	ZENG F R. Research of insect artificial diet[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2018, 34(2): 184-197. (in Chinese)
[16]	COUDRON T A, WITTMEYER J, KIM Y. Life history and cost analysis for continuous rearing of Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on a zoophytophagous artificial diet[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2002, 95(6): 1159-1168.
[17]	SARWAR M, SAQIB S M. Rearing of predatory seven spotted ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on natural and artificial diets under laboratory conditions[J]. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 2010, 42(1): 47-51.
[18]	CHEN J, GUO Y S, HUANG S M, ZHAN H R, ZHANG M F, WANG J W, SHU Y H. Integration of transcriptome and proteome reveals molecular mechanisms underlying stress responses of the cutworm, Spodoptera litura, exposed to different levels of lead (Pb)[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 283: 131205.
[19]	JALEEL W, YIN J Y, WANG D S, HE Y R, LU L H, SHI H. Using two-sex life tables to determine fitness parameters of four Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared on a semi-artificial diet[J]. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2018, 108(6): 707-714.
[20]	SHU Y H, ZHOU J L, LU K, LI K Q, ZHOU Q. Response of the common cutworm Spadoptera litura to lead stress: changes in sex ratio, Pb accumulations, midgut cell ultrastructure[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 139: 441-451.
[21]	WALDBAUER G P. The consumption and utilization of food by insects[J]. Advances in Insect Physiology, 1968, 5: 229-288.
[22]	DOS SANTOS P H, NEVES S M, SANT'ANNA D O, DE OLIVEIRA C H, CARVALHO H D. The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: an overview of applications[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 212: 119-138.
[23]	WU L H, ZHOU C, LONG G Y, YANG X B, WEI Z Y, LIAO Y J, YANG H, HU C X. Fitness of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda to three solanaceous vegetables[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 755-763.
[24]	郭志祥, 何成兴, 普春晓, 陈福寿, 尚慧, 番华彩, 白亭亭, 曾莉. 草地贪夜蛾寄主选择性及对其生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(3): 139-144.
	GUO Z X, HE C X, PU C X, CHEN F S, SHANG H, PAN H C, BAI T T, ZENG L. Spodoptera frugiperda: host selection and effect on its growth and development[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(3): 139-144. (in Chinese)
[25]	HE L M, WANG T L, CHEN Y C, GE S S, WYCKHUYS K A G, WU K M. Larval diet affects development and reproduction of East Asian strain of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 736-744.
[26]	BARROS E M, TORRES J B, BUENO A F. Oviposition,development, and reproduction of Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) fed on different hosts of economic importance[J]. Neotropical Entomology, 2010, 39(6): 996-1001.
[27]	HE L M, WU Q L, GAO X W, WU K M. Population life tables for the invasive fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda fed on major oil crops planted in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 745-754.
[28]	李定银, 郅军锐, 张涛, 叶佳琴, 梁玉健. 不同寄主对草地贪夜蛾生长发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2020, 42(2): 311-317.
	LI D Y, ZHI J R, ZHANG T, YE J Q, LIANG Y J. Effects of different host plants on the development and reproduction of Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2020, 42(2): 311-317. (in Chinese)
[29]	苏湘宁, 李传瑛, 许益镌, 黄少华, 刘伟玲, 廖章轩, 章玉苹. 草地贪夜蛾对5种寄主植物和6种杂草的取食选择性和适应性[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2022, 44(2): 263-272.
	SU X N, LI C Y, XU Y X, HUANG S H, LIU W L, LIAO Z X, ZHANG Y P. Feeding preference and adaptability of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda on five species of host plants and six weeds[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2022, 44(2): 263-272. (in Chinese)
[30]	刘庆叶, 吴旭东, 戎茸, 李伟明, 郭荣, 王克春, 殷宏宝, 王东升, 陈莉莉. 松花菜与油麦菜间作对松花菜虫害的抑制研究[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2020(3): 61-62.
	LIU Q Y, WU X D, RONG R, LI W M, GUO R, WANG K C, YIN H B, WANG D S, CHEN L L. Study on the control of insect pests of Brassica oleracea intercropped with Lactuca sativa[J]. Shanghai Vegetables, 2020(3): 61-62. (in Chinese)
[31]	徐霞. 间作套种对露地蔬菜主要害虫的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
	XU X. The effect of outdoor vegetable intercropping on pests[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[32]	何越超. 黄曲条跳甲的非化学防治技术研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2017.
	HE Y C. Studies on non-chemical control measures of Phyllotreta striolata (Fabricius)[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[33]	ALADESANWA R D, ADIGUN A W. Evaluation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) live mulch at different spacings for weed suppression and yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) in southwestern Nigeria[J]. Crop Protection, 2008, 27(6): 968-975.
[34]	叶加贵, 潘昌平, 黄益峰, 吴星星, 蓝金珠, 林水娟, 李丹. 甜玉米—迷你型小番薯间作套种模式研究与示范推广项目可行性报告[EB/OL].(2019-10-13)[2021-12-05]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=SNAD&dbname=SNAD&filename=SNAD000001896015.
	YE J G, PAN C P, HUANG Y F, WU X X, LAN J Z, LIN S J, LI D. Study on interplanting model of sweet corn and mini sweet potato and feasibility report of demonstration and extension project[EB/OL].(2019-10-13)[2021-12-05]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=SNAD&dbname=SNAD&filename=SNAD000001896015. . (in Chinese)
[35]	蒋志惠, 常雪梅, 张照然, 曲毅程, 田灿, 谷令彪, 张守泉. 艾草的化学成分和药理作用研究进展[J]. 中国兽药杂志, 2019, 53(2): 76-85.
	JIANG Z H, CHANG X M, ZHANG Z R, QU Y C, TIAN C, GU L B, ZHANG S Q. Advances in the phytochemistry and pharmacology of Artemisia argyi[J]. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Drug, 2019, 53(2): 76-85. (in Chinese)
[36]	BOUZENNA H, KRICHEN L. Pelargonium graveolens L’Her. and Artemisia arborescens L. essential oils: chemical composition, antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani and insecticidal activity against Rhysopertha dominica[J]. Natural Product Research, 2013, 27(9): 841-846.
[37]	NEGAHBAN M, MOHARRAMIPOUR S, SEFIDKON F. Fumigant toxicity of essential oil from Artemisia sieberi Besser against three stored-product insects[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2007, 43(2): 123-128.
[38]	张治科, 虎花, 尚小霞. 黄瓜叶信息化学物质鉴定及其对西花蓟马的行为调控[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(4): 83-89.
	ZHANG Z K, HU H, SHANG X X. Identification of semiochemicals in cucumber leaves and their behavioral regulations on western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 41(4): 83-89. (in Chinese)
[39]	李寿银, 陈聪, 李慧, 樊斌琦, 王焱, 郝德君. 取食含不同植物源成分的饲料对香樟齿喙象幼虫生长发育及体内解毒酶活性的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2019, 62(11): 1286-1296.
	LI S Y, CHEN C, LI H, FAN B Q, WANG Y, HAO D J. Effects of feeding on diets containing components of different plants on the development and detoxifying enzyme activities in Pagiophloeus tsushimanus (Coleptera: Curculionidae) larvae[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2019, 62(11): 1286- 1296. (in Chinese)
[40]	FALLAHNEJAD-MOJARRAD N, GOLDASTEH S, RAFIEI-KARAHROODI Z, SHOUSHTARI R V. Response of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to different semi-artificial diets[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(6): 1303-1318.

目标层Decision goal	存活Survival			生长^**Growth			发育历期^**Development period
要素层	幼虫存活率	化蛹率	羽化率	幼虫增重^*	相对生长率^*	蛹重	幼虫期	预蛹期	蛹期
权重	0.14	0.13	0.13	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10

目标层Decision goal	存活Survival			生长^**Growth			发育历期^**Development period
要素层	幼虫存活率	化蛹率	羽化率	幼虫增重^*	相对生长率^*	蛹重	幼虫期	预蛹期	蛹期
权重	0.14	0.13	0.13	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10

处理 Treatment		存活Survival			生长Growth			发育历期Development period			加权总分 Weighted score
处理 Treatment		幼虫存活率 Larva survival rate	化蛹率 Pupation rate	羽化率 Eclosion rate	幼虫增重 Larva gain weight	相对生长率RGR	蛹重 Pupal weight	幼虫期 Larva period	预蛹期 Prepupal period	蛹期 Pupal period	加权总分 Weighted score
植物粉末	大豆	5	5	5	4	5	5	1	3	1	3.80
	豇豆	5	5	4	5	5	5	1	3	1	3.72
	黄瓜	5	5	3	4	5	5	1	3	1	3.62
	玉米	5	4	4	4	5	5	1	3	1	3.57
	番薯	5	5	4	3	2	4	1	3	1	3.20
	艾草	5	4	4	3	3	3	1	1	1	2.92
	油麦菜	5	3	3	4	4	4	1	1	1	2.83
新鲜叶片	玉米	4	5	5	5	5	3	3	4	1	3.91
	豇豆	5	5	5	4	4	5	3	3	1	3.85
	大豆	5	3	5	5	4	4	3	3	1	3.59
	黄瓜	3	3	5	4	2	5	1	1	1	2.76
	番薯	1									0.14
	艾草	1									0.14
	油麦菜	1									0.14

处理 Treatment		存活Survival			生长Growth			发育历期Development period			加权总分 Weighted score
处理 Treatment		幼虫存活率 Larva survival rate	化蛹率 Pupation rate	羽化率 Eclosion rate	幼虫增重 Larva gain weight	相对生长率RGR	蛹重 Pupal weight	幼虫期 Larva period	预蛹期 Prepupal period	蛹期 Pupal period	加权总分 Weighted score
植物粉末	大豆	5	5	5	4	5	5	1	3	1	3.80
	豇豆	5	5	4	5	5	5	1	3	1	3.72
	黄瓜	5	5	3	4	5	5	1	3	1	3.62
	玉米	5	4	4	4	5	5	1	3	1	3.57
	番薯	5	5	4	3	2	4	1	3	1	3.20
	艾草	5	4	4	3	3	3	1	1	1	2.92
	油麦菜	5	3	3	4	4	4	1	1	1	2.83
新鲜叶片	玉米	4	5	5	5	5	3	3	4	1	3.91
	豇豆	5	5	5	4	4	5	3	3	1	3.85
	大豆	5	3	5	5	4	4	3	3	1	3.59
	黄瓜	3	3	5	4	2	5	1	1	1	2.76
	番薯	1									0.14
	艾草	1									0.14
	油麦菜	1									0.14