Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 985-993.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.05.019
• Biotechnology and Tissue Culture • Previous Articles Next Articles
XIE Juan,LI Long,XING Yue,WENG Qingshi,FAN Wanlin,PENG Donghui()
Received:
2019-05-10
Revised:
2019-09-12
Online:
2020-05-25
Published:
2020-06-15
Contact:
PENG Donghui
CLC Number:
XIE Juan,LI Long,XING Yue,WENG Qingshi,FAN Wanlin,PENG Donghui. Rhizome Proliferation and Bud differentiation of Cymbiduim sinense ‘Wuzicui’ × C. sinense ‘Honghua’ Hybrid[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 985-993.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.05.019
处理 Treatments | A:NAA浓度 NAA concentration /(mg·L-1) | B:6-BA浓度 6-BA concentration /(mg·L-1) | C:TDZ浓度 TDZ concentration /(mg·L-1) | 生长速度 Growth speed | 增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.10 | 2.00 | 0.20 | 3.45±0.53bc | 5.35±0.10a | ||
2 | 0.10 | 5.00 | 0.50 | 3.34±0.19c | 4.08±0.30bc | ||
3 | 0.10 | 8.00 | 0.80 | 4.46±0.02a | 5.05±1.05ab | ||
4 | 0.30 | 2.00 | 0.50 | 3.34±0.36c | 3.05±0.70c | ||
5 | 0.30 | 5.00 | 0.80 | 3.75±0.46bc | 4.13±1.13bc | ||
6 | 0.30 | 8.00 | 0.20 | 3.37±0.50c | 3.07±0.36c | ||
7 | 0.50 | 2.00 | 0.80 | 2.55±0.32d | 3.00±0.20c | ||
8 | 0.50 | 5.00 | 0.20 | 4.04±0.03ab | 4.08±0.08bc | ||
9 | 0.50 | 8.00 | 0.50 | 3.37±0.31c | 3.58±0.08c | ||
Ka1 | 3.75 | 3.11 | 3.62 | Ra值:B>A>C 最优水平:A1B3C1 | |||
Ka2 | 3.49 | 3.71 | 3.35 | ||||
Ka3 | 3.32 | 3.73 | 3.59 | ||||
Ra | 0.43 | 0.62 | 0.27 | ||||
Kb1 | 4.83 | 3.80 | 4.16 | Rb值:A>C>B 最优水平:A1B2C1 | |||
Kb2 | 3.41 | 4.10 | 3.57 | ||||
Kb3 | 3.56 | 3.90 | 4.06 | ||||
Rb | 1.42 | 0.30 | 0.59 |
Tab. 1 Effects of NAA, 6-BA and TDZ on rhizome proliferation of Cymbidium sinense hybrid
处理 Treatments | A:NAA浓度 NAA concentration /(mg·L-1) | B:6-BA浓度 6-BA concentration /(mg·L-1) | C:TDZ浓度 TDZ concentration /(mg·L-1) | 生长速度 Growth speed | 增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.10 | 2.00 | 0.20 | 3.45±0.53bc | 5.35±0.10a | ||
2 | 0.10 | 5.00 | 0.50 | 3.34±0.19c | 4.08±0.30bc | ||
3 | 0.10 | 8.00 | 0.80 | 4.46±0.02a | 5.05±1.05ab | ||
4 | 0.30 | 2.00 | 0.50 | 3.34±0.36c | 3.05±0.70c | ||
5 | 0.30 | 5.00 | 0.80 | 3.75±0.46bc | 4.13±1.13bc | ||
6 | 0.30 | 8.00 | 0.20 | 3.37±0.50c | 3.07±0.36c | ||
7 | 0.50 | 2.00 | 0.80 | 2.55±0.32d | 3.00±0.20c | ||
8 | 0.50 | 5.00 | 0.20 | 4.04±0.03ab | 4.08±0.08bc | ||
9 | 0.50 | 8.00 | 0.50 | 3.37±0.31c | 3.58±0.08c | ||
Ka1 | 3.75 | 3.11 | 3.62 | Ra值:B>A>C 最优水平:A1B3C1 | |||
Ka2 | 3.49 | 3.71 | 3.35 | ||||
Ka3 | 3.32 | 3.73 | 3.59 | ||||
Ra | 0.43 | 0.62 | 0.27 | ||||
Kb1 | 4.83 | 3.80 | 4.16 | Rb值:A>C>B 最优水平:A1B2C1 | |||
Kb2 | 3.41 | 4.10 | 3.57 | ||||
Kb3 | 3.56 | 3.90 | 4.06 | ||||
Rb | 1.42 | 0.30 | 0.59 |
源 Source | 因变量 Dependent variable | III类平方和 Class III square sum | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
修正模型 | 生长速度 | 3.430a | 6 | 0.572 | 2.073 | 0.103 | |
增殖系数 | 13.127b | 6 | 2.188 | 4.062 | 0.008 | ||
截距 | 生长速度 | 334.432 | 1 | 334.432 | 1212.398 | 0 | |
增殖系数 | 417.563 | 1 | 417.563 | 775.349 | 0 | ||
A:NAA浓度/(mg·L-1) | 生长速度 | 0.821 | 2 | 0.411 | 1.489 | 0.25 | |
增殖系数 | 10.908 | 2 | 5.454 | 10.127 | 0.001 | ||
B:6-BA浓度/(mg·L-1) | 生长速度 | 2.223 | 2 | 1.112 | 4.030 | 0.034 | |
增殖系数 | 0.413 | 2 | 0.207 | 0.384 | 0.686 | ||
C:TDZ浓度/(mg·L-1) | 生长速度 | 0.386 | 2 | 0.193 | 0.699 | 0.509 | |
增殖系数 | 1.805 | 2 | 0.903 | 1.676 | 0.212 | ||
误差 | 生长速度 | 5.517 | 20 | 0.276 | — | — | |
增殖系数 | 10.771 | 20 | 0.539 | — | — | ||
总计 | 生长速度 | 343.379 | 27 | — | — | — | |
增殖系数 | 441.460 | 27 | — | — | — | ||
修正后总计 | 生长速度 | 8.947 | 26 | — | — | — | |
增殖系数 | 23.898 | 26 | — | — | — |
Tab. 2 Main inter-effects of effects of NAA, 6-BA and TDZ on proliferation of rhizomes
源 Source | 因变量 Dependent variable | III类平方和 Class III square sum | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
修正模型 | 生长速度 | 3.430a | 6 | 0.572 | 2.073 | 0.103 | |
增殖系数 | 13.127b | 6 | 2.188 | 4.062 | 0.008 | ||
截距 | 生长速度 | 334.432 | 1 | 334.432 | 1212.398 | 0 | |
增殖系数 | 417.563 | 1 | 417.563 | 775.349 | 0 | ||
A:NAA浓度/(mg·L-1) | 生长速度 | 0.821 | 2 | 0.411 | 1.489 | 0.25 | |
增殖系数 | 10.908 | 2 | 5.454 | 10.127 | 0.001 | ||
B:6-BA浓度/(mg·L-1) | 生长速度 | 2.223 | 2 | 1.112 | 4.030 | 0.034 | |
增殖系数 | 0.413 | 2 | 0.207 | 0.384 | 0.686 | ||
C:TDZ浓度/(mg·L-1) | 生长速度 | 0.386 | 2 | 0.193 | 0.699 | 0.509 | |
增殖系数 | 1.805 | 2 | 0.903 | 1.676 | 0.212 | ||
误差 | 生长速度 | 5.517 | 20 | 0.276 | — | — | |
增殖系数 | 10.771 | 20 | 0.539 | — | — | ||
总计 | 生长速度 | 343.379 | 27 | — | — | — | |
增殖系数 | 441.460 | 27 | — | — | — | ||
修正后总计 | 生长速度 | 8.947 | 26 | — | — | — | |
增殖系数 | 23.898 | 26 | — | — | — |
Fig. 2 Differentiation of C. sinense hybrid rhizomes A: Dark culture for 30 d; B: Culture for 60 d; C: Culture for 120 d; D: Treatment 5 sides; E: Treatment for 5; F: Treatment 8.
处理 Treatments | A:NAA浓度 NAA concentration/(mg·L-1) | B:6-BA浓度 6-BA concentration/(mg·L-1) | C:TDZ浓度 TDZ concentration/(mg·L-1) | 叶芽分化率 Leaf bud differentiation rate/% | 株高 Plant height/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.30 | 8.00 | 0.20 | 37.50±10.61ab | 2.79±0.06bc | |
2 | 0.30 | 10.00 | 0.50 | 30.00±21.21abc | 4.04±0.77ab | |
3 | 0.30 | 12.00 | 0.80 | 22.50±10.61bc | 1.35±0.92c | |
4 | 0.50 | 8.00 | 0.50 | 5.00±0.00c | 1.35±0.11c | |
5 | 0.50 | 10.00 | 0.80 | 40.00±7.07ab | 4.11±0.98ab | |
6 | 0.50 | 12.00 | 0.20 | 27.50±3.54abc | 2.71±0.98bc | |
7 | 0.70 | 8.00 | 0.80 | 22.50±7.50bc | 4.98±0.31a | |
8 | 0.70 | 10.00 | 0.20 | 52.50±10.61a | 5.36±1.31a | |
9 | 0.70 | 12.00 | 0.50 | 30.00±14.14abc | 4.46±0.72ab | |
Ka1 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.39 | Ra值:B>C>A 最优水平:A3B2C1 | ||
Ka2 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.22 | |||
Ka3 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.28 | |||
Ra | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.18 | |||
Kb1 | 2.73 | 3.04 | 3.62 | Rb值:A>B>C 最优水平:A3B2C1 | ||
Kb2 | 2.72 | 4.50 | 3.28 | |||
Kb3 | 4.93 | 2.84 | 3.48 | |||
Rb | 2.21 | 1.66 | 0.34 |
Tab. 3 Effects of NAA, 6-BA and TDZ on leaf bud differentiation of C. sinense hybrid rhizome
处理 Treatments | A:NAA浓度 NAA concentration/(mg·L-1) | B:6-BA浓度 6-BA concentration/(mg·L-1) | C:TDZ浓度 TDZ concentration/(mg·L-1) | 叶芽分化率 Leaf bud differentiation rate/% | 株高 Plant height/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.30 | 8.00 | 0.20 | 37.50±10.61ab | 2.79±0.06bc | |
2 | 0.30 | 10.00 | 0.50 | 30.00±21.21abc | 4.04±0.77ab | |
3 | 0.30 | 12.00 | 0.80 | 22.50±10.61bc | 1.35±0.92c | |
4 | 0.50 | 8.00 | 0.50 | 5.00±0.00c | 1.35±0.11c | |
5 | 0.50 | 10.00 | 0.80 | 40.00±7.07ab | 4.11±0.98ab | |
6 | 0.50 | 12.00 | 0.20 | 27.50±3.54abc | 2.71±0.98bc | |
7 | 0.70 | 8.00 | 0.80 | 22.50±7.50bc | 4.98±0.31a | |
8 | 0.70 | 10.00 | 0.20 | 52.50±10.61a | 5.36±1.31a | |
9 | 0.70 | 12.00 | 0.50 | 30.00±14.14abc | 4.46±0.72ab | |
Ka1 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.39 | Ra值:B>C>A 最优水平:A3B2C1 | ||
Ka2 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.22 | |||
Ka3 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.28 | |||
Ra | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.18 | |||
Kb1 | 2.73 | 3.04 | 3.62 | Rb值:A>B>C 最优水平:A3B2C1 | ||
Kb2 | 2.72 | 4.50 | 3.28 | |||
Kb3 | 4.93 | 2.84 | 3.48 | |||
Rb | 2.21 | 1.66 | 0.34 |
源 Source | III 类平方和 Class III square sum | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
修正模型 | 0.248a | 6 | 0.041 | 3.028 | 0.053 |
截距 | 1.590 | 1 | 1.590 | 116.718 | 0.000 |
A:NAA浓度/(mg·L-1) | 0.035 | 2 | 0.018 | 1.295 | 0.313 |
B:6-BA浓度/(mg·L-1) | 0.119 | 2 | 0.059 | 4.353 | 0.040 |
C:TDZ浓度/(mg·L-1) | 0.094 | 2 | 0.047 | 3.436 | 0.069 |
误差 | 0.150 | 11 | 0.014 | — | — |
总计 | 1.988 | 18 | — | — | — |
修正后总计 | 0.397 | 17 | — | — | — |
Tab. 4 Main inter-effects of the effects of peptone, coconut milk and activated carbon on leaf bud differentiation rate
源 Source | III 类平方和 Class III square sum | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
修正模型 | 0.248a | 6 | 0.041 | 3.028 | 0.053 |
截距 | 1.590 | 1 | 1.590 | 116.718 | 0.000 |
A:NAA浓度/(mg·L-1) | 0.035 | 2 | 0.018 | 1.295 | 0.313 |
B:6-BA浓度/(mg·L-1) | 0.119 | 2 | 0.059 | 4.353 | 0.040 |
C:TDZ浓度/(mg·L-1) | 0.094 | 2 | 0.047 | 3.436 | 0.069 |
误差 | 0.150 | 11 | 0.014 | — | — |
总计 | 1.988 | 18 | — | — | — |
修正后总计 | 0.397 | 17 | — | — | — |
处理 Treatments | A:蛋白胨 Peptone/ (mg·L-1) | B:椰汁 CW/ (mL·L-1) | C:活性炭 AC/ (g·L-1) | 叶芽分化率 Leaf bud differentiation rate/% | 株高 Plant height/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.00 | 50.00 | 1.00 | 65.00±13.23d | 2.38±0.44cd | |
2 | 1.00 | 100.00 | 1.50 | 26.70±2.89e | 1.93±0.21d | |
3 | 1.00 | 150.00 | 2.00 | 38.30±15.28de | 3.08±0.38abcd | |
4 | 4.00 | 50.00 | 1.50 | 53.00±2.89de | 3.12±0.20abc | |
5 | 4.00 | 100.00 | 2.00 | 35.00±5.00e | 4.41±0.74a | |
6 | 4.00 | 150.00 | 1.00 | 145.00±18.03b | 4.11±0.56ab | |
7 | 7.00 | 50.00 | 2.00 | 91.70±14.43c | 2.91±1.75bcd | |
8 | 7.00 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 173.30±34.03a | 3.58±0.09abc | |
9 | 7.00 | 150.00 | 1.50 | 48.30±2.89de | 3.32±0.46abc | |
Ka1 | 0.43 | 0.71 | 1.28 | Ra值:C>A>B 最优水平:A3B2C1 | ||
Ka2 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.43 | |||
Ka3 | 1.04 | 0.77 | 0.55 | |||
Ra | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.85 | |||
Kb1 | 2.47 | 2.80 | 3.36 | Rb值:A>B>C 最优水平:A2B3C3 | ||
Kb2 | 3.88 | 3.31 | 2.79 | |||
Kb3 | 3.27 | 3.50 | 3.47 | |||
Rb | 1.41 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
Tab. 5 Effects of peptone, CW and AC on differentiation of C. sinense hybrid rhizomes
处理 Treatments | A:蛋白胨 Peptone/ (mg·L-1) | B:椰汁 CW/ (mL·L-1) | C:活性炭 AC/ (g·L-1) | 叶芽分化率 Leaf bud differentiation rate/% | 株高 Plant height/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.00 | 50.00 | 1.00 | 65.00±13.23d | 2.38±0.44cd | |
2 | 1.00 | 100.00 | 1.50 | 26.70±2.89e | 1.93±0.21d | |
3 | 1.00 | 150.00 | 2.00 | 38.30±15.28de | 3.08±0.38abcd | |
4 | 4.00 | 50.00 | 1.50 | 53.00±2.89de | 3.12±0.20abc | |
5 | 4.00 | 100.00 | 2.00 | 35.00±5.00e | 4.41±0.74a | |
6 | 4.00 | 150.00 | 1.00 | 145.00±18.03b | 4.11±0.56ab | |
7 | 7.00 | 50.00 | 2.00 | 91.70±14.43c | 2.91±1.75bcd | |
8 | 7.00 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 173.30±34.03a | 3.58±0.09abc | |
9 | 7.00 | 150.00 | 1.50 | 48.30±2.89de | 3.32±0.46abc | |
Ka1 | 0.43 | 0.71 | 1.28 | Ra值:C>A>B 最优水平:A3B2C1 | ||
Ka2 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.43 | |||
Ka3 | 1.04 | 0.77 | 0.55 | |||
Ra | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.85 | |||
Kb1 | 2.47 | 2.80 | 3.36 | Rb值:A>B>C 最优水平:A2B3C3 | ||
Kb2 | 3.88 | 3.31 | 2.79 | |||
Kb3 | 3.27 | 3.50 | 3.47 | |||
Rb | 1.41 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
源 Source | III类平方和 Class III square sum | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
修正模型 | 5.528a | 6 | 0.921 | 13.91 | 0.000 |
截距 | 15.263 | 1 | 15.263 | 230.443 | 0.000 |
A:蛋白胨浓度/ (mg·L-1) | 1.690 | 2 | 0.845 | 12.755 | 0.000 |
B:椰汁浓度/ (mg·L-1) | 0.037 | 2 | 0.018 | 0.278 | 0.760 |
C:活性炭/ (mg·L-1) | 3.801 | 2 | 1.901 | 28.697 | 0.000 |
误差 | 1.325 | 20 | 0.066 | — | — |
总计 | 22.115 | 27 | — | — | — |
修正后总计 | 6.852 | 26 | — | — | — |
Tab. 6 Main inter-effects of the effects of peptone, coconut milk and activated carbon on leaf bud differentiation rate
源 Source | III类平方和 Class III square sum | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
修正模型 | 5.528a | 6 | 0.921 | 13.91 | 0.000 |
截距 | 15.263 | 1 | 15.263 | 230.443 | 0.000 |
A:蛋白胨浓度/ (mg·L-1) | 1.690 | 2 | 0.845 | 12.755 | 0.000 |
B:椰汁浓度/ (mg·L-1) | 0.037 | 2 | 0.018 | 0.278 | 0.760 |
C:活性炭/ (mg·L-1) | 3.801 | 2 | 1.901 | 28.697 | 0.000 |
误差 | 1.325 | 20 | 0.066 | — | — |
总计 | 22.115 | 27 | — | — | — |
修正后总计 | 6.852 | 26 | — | — | — |
[1] | 陈丽, 潘瑞炽, 陈汝民. 墨兰原球茎生长的研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 1999(1):59-64. |
[2] | 施福军, 莫昭展, 韦江萍, 等. 墨兰的无菌播种及根状茎的增殖研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(32):13968-13969, 13992. |
[3] | 左利娟, 汤久杨, 李志强. 墨兰杂交及F1代离体培养研究[J]. 北京农业职业学院学报, 2017,31(3):22-25. |
[4] | 丁雪珍, 韩磊, 张文静. 墨兰增殖培养基的筛选研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2009(8):208-209. |
[5] | 陈兰芬, 王晶, 田亦平, 等. 墨兰组织培养根状茎分化技术研究[J]. 河北林果研究, 2011,26(1):22-24. |
[6] | 鲁雪华, 郭文杰, 林勇. 墨兰的无菌播种和植株再生[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 1999(1):34-37. |
[7] | 傅雪琳, 张志胜, 何平, 等. 墨兰根状茎绿芽分化的研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2000(3):53-55. |
[8] | 朱根发, 叶秀斌, 陈明莉, 等. 培养基不同成分对墨兰根状茎分化成苗的影响[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2003(5):42-44, 58. |
[9] | 许申平, 袁秀云, 王默霏, 等. 墨兰(Cymbiduim sinense)组培快繁技术体系研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018,39(5):926-930. |
[10] | Yan X, Feng-an Y U, Zhen-hua P. Tissue culture of Cymbidium sinensis[J]. Forest Research, 2003,16(4):434-438. |
[11] | Chen Y Y, Zhang Y, Zhang C, et al. A study on aseptic seed germination of interspecific hybrid between Cymbidium hybrida × C. sinense and C. faberi[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2009,36(3):441-446. |
[12] | Gao R, Wu S Q, Piao X C, et al. Micropropagation of Cymbidium sinense using continuous and temporary airlift bioreactor systems[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2014,36(1):117-124. |
[13] | Chang C, Chang W. Effect of thidiazuron on bud development of Cymbidium sinense Willd in vitro[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2000,30(2):171-175. |
[14] | 徐程, 詹忠根, 张铭. 中国兰的组织培养[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2002(2):171-174. |
[15] | 郑艳艳. 墨兰组培体系的优化及根状茎在生物反应器培养的研究[D]. 延吉: 延边大学, 2011. |
[16] | 刘昳雯, 许春梅, 王丹, 等. 莲瓣兰“滇梅”根状茎的增殖与分化技术研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014,42(10):2890-2892. |
[17] |
Duan J X, Yazawa S. Floral induction and development in Phalaenopsis in vitro[J]. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 1995,43(1):71-74.
DOI URL |
[18] |
Duan J X, Yazawa S. In vitro floral development in × Doriella Tiny (Doritis pulcherrima × Kingiella philippinensis)[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 1994,59(3-4):253-264.
DOI URL |
[19] | Duan J X, Yazawa S. In vitro flowering of Doriella, Phalaenopsis and Dendrobium[J]. Proceedings of NIOC, 1994: 87-96. |
[20] | 陈云喜, 何丹丹, 廖浩如, 等. 影响墨兰×兔耳兰根状茎芽分化的因素[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(9):65-69. |
[21] | Zeng S, Wu K, da Silva J A T, et al. Asymbiotic seed germination, seedling development and reintroduction of Paphiopedilum wardii Sumerh., an endangered terrestrial orchid[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2012,138:198-209. |
[22] | 罗虹. 活性炭对墨兰根状茎生长的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 1998(1):30-31. |
[23] | 翁锦周, 林加耕, 林江波. 不同浓度活性炭对墨兰离体培养的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2006(3):37-38, 36. |
[1] | GAO Shengfeng,YANG Kaihu,LU Daqian,LIU Aiqin,GOU Yafeng,SUN Shiwei,WANG Zheng,MENG Qianqian. Sporangium Induction and Development Process Microscopy of Black Pepper Phytophthora Foot Rot Pathogen, Phytophthora capsici [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(9): 1870-1875. |
[2] | CHEN Heming,JIANG Nan,LYU Fubing,XIAO Wenfang,LI Zuo,ZHU Genfa. Tissue Culture Technology for Pedicel Shoots of Dendrobium kingianum Bidwill [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(8): 1529-1534. |
[3] | MO Yuanqi,LI Hanwen,JIANG Nan,ZHENG Feng,FANG Lin,LI Lin,ZHOU Yiqing,WU Kunlin,ZENG Songjun. Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation of Dendrobium Hibiki [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1179-1188. |
[4] | NIE Yue,LU Tangfei,CHEN Junyu,ZHANG Fangping,NIU Liming,FU Yueguan. Geographical Population Genetic Differentiation Analysis of Eotetranychus sexmaculatus in Rubber Tree Based on Mitochondrial COI Gene Sequences [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 773-778. |
[5] | WU Shaohua,ZHANG Shixin,YANG Shuguang,TIAN Weimin. Selection of Reference Genes for Normalization of Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis in Secondary Laticifer Differentiation Induced by Trichostatin A in Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(3): 504-512. |
[6] | WU Lifang,TIAN Xuelian,WEI Xiaomei,LU Xiaochun,QIAN Shaofang,GUI Baolin. Vitrification of Regenerated Shoots of Tagetes erecta L. in Pigment Marigold [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(1): 110-115. |
[7] | LYU Yumeng,XU Xiaoping,ZHANG Shuting,GUO Zhipeng,WANG Jinfeng,LIN Yuling,WANG Tianchi,LAI Zhongxiong. Establishment of a Tissue Culture System for Wild Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua in Sanming [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(8): 1559-1564. |
[8] | JIAO Zhan,AN Shengjun,SHAO Tiemei. Establishment of New Protocorm-like Bodies System of Anoectochilus roxburghii by ‘Double Two-steps’ Method [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(2): 314-322. |
[9] | HUANG Dongmei,XU Yi,LI Jingyang,LI Yujia,LIN Fei,LI Yanxia,SONG Shun. Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation Technology of Hopson Flower of Musa velutina [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(11): 2174-2177. |
[10] | TAN Deguan,PENG Jing,HAN Bingying,FU Lili,SUN Xuepiao,ZHANG Jiaming. Histochemical and Molecular Characterization of Laticifer Cells in Calli Derived from Petioles of Rubber Tree [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(1): 73-78. |
[11] | FENG Jing, LU Jiang. Research Progress of Grape Flowering Molecular Biology [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(8): 1673-1681. |
[12] | LU Jiannong , SHI Yuzhen , CHEN Haibiao , LUO Yinyin , YIN Xuegui. Induction of Autotetraploid Pueraria with Colchicine [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(5): 840-845. |
[13] | XU Shenping, YUAN Xiuyun, WANG Mofei, CUI Bo. Micropropagation in vitro of Cymbidium sinensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(5): 926-930. |
[14] | LUO Na, ZHANG Xiaoxia, YANG Lijiao, WANG Xiaojing, SUN Shulan. Effects of Different Light Qualities on Plantlets Development of Zingiber corallinum Hance [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(4): 651-655. |
[15] | LIN Xiuqin, MAO Jun, LU Xin, LI Chunjia, HU Xin, LIU Hongbo, ZI Qiuyan, LI Xujuan, XU Chaohua, LIU Xinlong. Analysis and Microscopic Observation of Paraffin Sections of Sugarcane Inflorescence Initiation and Differentiation [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(3): 507-512. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||