Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 2135-2141.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.11.006
• Phytophysiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Fupeng1,2,3,WU Baoduo1,2,3,QIN Xiaowei1,2,3,YAN Lin1,2,3,LAI Jianxiong1,2,3,*()
Received:
2019-04-15
Revised:
2019-06-06
Online:
2019-11-25
Published:
2019-11-28
Contact:
Jianxiong LAI
LI Fupeng,WU Baoduo,QIN Xiaowei,YAN Lin,LAI Jianxiong. Preliminary Evaluation on Cold Resistance of Cacao Germplasm Resources and Physiological Response under Low Temperature Stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(11): 2135-2141.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.11.006
种质 Germplasm | 叶片冻害率 Leaf frozen rate/% | 果实寒害等级率Pod frozen level and rate/% | 综合评定等级 Comprehensive grade | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1级Level 1 | 2级Level 2 | 3级Level 3 | 4级Level 4 | |||
VN-o62 | 32.9 | 48.6 | 35.9 | 9.9 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
THA-o10 | 14.3 | 22.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | Ⅱ |
THA-o6 | 70.5 | 73.2 | 62.2 | 62.2 | 62.2 | Ⅴ |
INA-t5 | 15.6 | 9.8 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅰ |
INA-t1 | 26.3 | 37.1 | 33.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
VN-tr2 | 34.1 | 54.8 | 47.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
THA-t4 | 27.5 | 39.7 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
THA-t9 | 22.9 | 47.3 | 34.4 | 3.8 | 3.8 | Ⅱ |
INA-f2 | 36.4 | 63.5 | 46.0 | 46.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
SBRI-f5 | 15.1 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 4.2 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-f21 | 33.8 | 61.5 | 42.3 | 18.3 | 18.3 | Ⅲ |
INA-f6 | 54.2 | 72.7 | 62.6 | 49.5 | 0.0 | Ⅳ |
INA-f8 | 28.0 | 28.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
INA-s5 | 19.8 | 36.7 | 25.5 | 4.1 | 4.1 | Ⅱ |
THA-s4 | 75.8 | 65.3 | 34.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
SBRI-s9 | 8.8 | 35.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅰ |
SBRI-s10 | 15.6 | 58.5 | 24.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-s13 | 25.8 | 54.7 | 34.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
VN-sv5 | 29.4 | 31.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
VN-sv6 | 15.9 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅰ |
SBRI-e7 | 16.9 | 32.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-e18 | 25.6 | 31.7 | 31.7 | 14.4 | 8.7 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-n2 | 33.8 | 35.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
种质 Germplasms | 叶片冻害率 Leaf frozen rate/% | 果实寒害等级率Pod frozen level and rate/% | 综合评定等级 Comprehensive grade | |||
1级Level 1 | 2级Level 2 | 3级Level 3 | 4级Level 4 | |||
SBRI-n9 | 27.8 | 40.5 | 13.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
COM-e8 | 33.8 | 33.6 | 12.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
COM-e12 | 41.4 | 33.3 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-e19 | 58.8 | 60.5 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-n1 | 46.1 | 68.4 | 46.5 | 24.6 | 0.0? | Ⅲ |
SBRI-n4 | 41.1 | 68.0 | 53.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
ECU-n9 | 34.7 | 66.2 | 48.6 | 4.1 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
ECU-n12 | 43.3 | 60.7 | 54.5 | 2.7 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
ECU-n15 | 44.8 | 67.2 | 28.4 | 28.4 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
PNG-tn5 | 27.5 | 72.1 | 23.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
ECU-ev1 | 47.4 | 43.6 | 21.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
ECU-ev3 | 31.2 | 39.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
ECU-ev6 | 59.7 | 66.7 | 63.1 | 36.9 | 0.0 | Ⅳ |
ECU-ev9 | 26.7 | 48.9 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
ECU-ev10 | 28.4 | 18.3 | 8.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
Tab. 1 Cold resistance evaluation of 38 cacao germplasm
种质 Germplasm | 叶片冻害率 Leaf frozen rate/% | 果实寒害等级率Pod frozen level and rate/% | 综合评定等级 Comprehensive grade | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1级Level 1 | 2级Level 2 | 3级Level 3 | 4级Level 4 | |||
VN-o62 | 32.9 | 48.6 | 35.9 | 9.9 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
THA-o10 | 14.3 | 22.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | Ⅱ |
THA-o6 | 70.5 | 73.2 | 62.2 | 62.2 | 62.2 | Ⅴ |
INA-t5 | 15.6 | 9.8 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅰ |
INA-t1 | 26.3 | 37.1 | 33.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
VN-tr2 | 34.1 | 54.8 | 47.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
THA-t4 | 27.5 | 39.7 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
THA-t9 | 22.9 | 47.3 | 34.4 | 3.8 | 3.8 | Ⅱ |
INA-f2 | 36.4 | 63.5 | 46.0 | 46.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
SBRI-f5 | 15.1 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 4.2 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-f21 | 33.8 | 61.5 | 42.3 | 18.3 | 18.3 | Ⅲ |
INA-f6 | 54.2 | 72.7 | 62.6 | 49.5 | 0.0 | Ⅳ |
INA-f8 | 28.0 | 28.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
INA-s5 | 19.8 | 36.7 | 25.5 | 4.1 | 4.1 | Ⅱ |
THA-s4 | 75.8 | 65.3 | 34.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
SBRI-s9 | 8.8 | 35.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅰ |
SBRI-s10 | 15.6 | 58.5 | 24.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-s13 | 25.8 | 54.7 | 34.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
VN-sv5 | 29.4 | 31.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
VN-sv6 | 15.9 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅰ |
SBRI-e7 | 16.9 | 32.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-e18 | 25.6 | 31.7 | 31.7 | 14.4 | 8.7 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-n2 | 33.8 | 35.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
种质 Germplasms | 叶片冻害率 Leaf frozen rate/% | 果实寒害等级率Pod frozen level and rate/% | 综合评定等级 Comprehensive grade | |||
1级Level 1 | 2级Level 2 | 3级Level 3 | 4级Level 4 | |||
SBRI-n9 | 27.8 | 40.5 | 13.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
COM-e8 | 33.8 | 33.6 | 12.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
COM-e12 | 41.4 | 33.3 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-e19 | 58.8 | 60.5 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
SBRI-n1 | 46.1 | 68.4 | 46.5 | 24.6 | 0.0? | Ⅲ |
SBRI-n4 | 41.1 | 68.0 | 53.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
ECU-n9 | 34.7 | 66.2 | 48.6 | 4.1 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
ECU-n12 | 43.3 | 60.7 | 54.5 | 2.7 | 0.0 | Ⅲ |
ECU-n15 | 44.8 | 67.2 | 28.4 | 28.4 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
PNG-tn5 | 27.5 | 72.1 | 23.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
ECU-ev1 | 47.4 | 43.6 | 21.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
ECU-ev3 | 31.2 | 39.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
ECU-ev6 | 59.7 | 66.7 | 63.1 | 36.9 | 0.0 | Ⅳ |
ECU-ev9 | 26.7 | 48.9 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
ECU-ev10 | 28.4 | 18.3 | 8.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Ⅱ |
Fig. 2 The leaves phenotype of INA-t5 and THA-o6 under 4 ℃ A-E, F-J showed leaves phenotype of INA-t5 and THA-o6 after stress of 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h, respectively.
Fig. 3 Phyllode anatomical structure of INA-t5 and THA-o6 leaves under 4 ℃ treatment A, B represented cold stress 0 and 96 h of INA-t5; C, D represented cold stress 0 and 96 h of THA-o6 (200×).
Fig. 4 Soluble sugar and protein contents of 4 cacao germplasms under 4 ℃ treatment Different capital and lowercase letters in the column indicate extremely significant difference(P<0.01) or significant difference (P<0.05)between treatments in the same duress time.
Fig. 5 MDA and Pro contents of 4 cacao germplasms under 4 ℃ treatment Different capital and lowercase letters in the column indicate extremely significant difference(P<0.01) or significant difference (P<0.05)between treatments in the same duress time.
Fig. 6 CAT, POD, SOD activities of 4 cacao germplasms under 4 ℃ treatment Different capital and lowercase letters in the column indicate extremely significant difference(P<0.01) or significant difference (P<0.05)between treatments in the same duress time.
[1] | Bruni R, Bianchini E, Bettarello L , et al. Lipid composition of wild Ecuadorian Theobroma subincanum Mart. seeds and comparison with two varieties of Theobroma cacao L.[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2000,48(3):691-694. |
[2] | 世界信息中心门户网站[DB/OL]. The International Cocoa Organization (ICCO). . |
[3] | 李付鹏, 王华, 伍宝朵 , 等. 可可果实主要农艺性状相关性及产量因素的通径分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2014,35(3):448-453. |
[4] | 张玲 . 我国巧克力消费市场前景广阔[J]. 生意通, 2005(3):28. |
[5] | 李付鹏, 谭乐和, 秦晓威 , 等. 成龄可可嫁接换种技术[J]. 中国热带农业, 2017,33(4):72-73, 62. |
[6] | 李付鹏, 王华, 伍宝朵 , 等. 可可果实主要农艺性状相关性及产量因素的通径分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2014,35(3):448-455. |
[7] | 何根元, 符凤梅 . 海南甘蔗可持续发展研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010,38(36):20995-20996. |
[8] | 李付鹏, 秦晓威, 郝朝运 , 等. 可可核心种质遗传多样性及果实性状与SSR标记关联分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016,37(2):226-233. |
[9] |
张智猛, 宋文武, 丁红 , 等. 不同生育期花生渗透调节物质含量和抗氧化酶活性对土壤水分的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(14):4257-4265.
DOI |
[10] | 朱政, 蒋家月, 江昌俊 , 等. 低温胁迫对茶树叶片SOD、可溶性蛋白和可溶性糖含量的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2011,38(1):24-26. |
[11] | 伍宝朵, 范睿, 胡丽松 , 等. 低温胁迫对胡椒叶片生理生化及显微结构的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018,39(8):1519-1525. |
[12] | 简令成 . 植物抗寒机理的研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 1992,9(3):17-22. |
[13] | 曹红星, 张骥昌, 雷新涛 , 等. 不同油棕资源对低温胁迫的生理生化响应[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2017,32(2):316-321. |
[14] | 令凡, 焦健, 李朝周 , 等. 不同油橄榄品种对低温胁迫的生理响应及抗寒性综合评价[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015,35(3):0508-0515. |
[15] | 邓化冰, 车芳璐, 肖应辉 , 等. 开花期低温胁迫对水稻花粉性状及剑叶理化特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(1):66-72. |
[16] | 王爱玲, 白世践, 蔡军社 . 葡萄砧木叶片抗寒生理指标的比较研究[J]. 农业科学, 2018,8(11):1232-1238. |
[17] | 王玲丽, 贾文杰, 马璐琳 , 等. 低温胁迫对不同百合主要生理指标的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014,50(9):1413-1422. |
[18] | 林绍生, 刘冬峰, 宋洋 , 等. 柚类资源抗寒性表现[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019,60(4):617-619. |
[19] | 何平, 李林光, 王海波 , 等. 5个苹果矮化砧木抗寒性研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019,51(1):42-45. |
[20] |
朱金方, 刘京涛, 陆兆华 , 等. 盐胁迫对中国柽柳幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(15):5140-5146.
DOI |
[21] | 王易振, 杨治国, 曾祥琼 , 等. 低温处理对青蒿叶片脯氨酸、SOD和CAT的含量及蛋白质的影响[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2010,29(5):927-930. |
[22] | 郭燕, 张树航, 李颖 , 等. 我国几个板栗品种抗寒性综合评价[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019,24(4):52-63. |
[23] | McKersie B D, Bowley S R, Harjanto E , et al . Water-deficit tolerance and field performance of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase[J]. Plant Physiology, 1996,111(4):1177-1181. |
[1] | YE Jianghua,HU Wenwen,ZHANG Qi,ZHANG Bo,WANG Peng,LUO Shengcai,WANG Haibin,JIA Xiaoli,HE Haibin. Correlation Between Soil Characteristics of Tea Plantations and the Growth and Fresh Leaf Quality of Wuyi Tea (Camellia sinensis cv. Shuixian) [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(9): 1838-1846. |
[2] | WANG Mengxin,WU Guohuo,CUI Lin,HAN Baoyu. Enzyme Activity Characteristics and Expression of Cu/Zn-SOD Gene in Tea Flowers [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1167-1173. |
[3] | HUANG Jichuan,PENG Zhiping,TU Yuting,WU Xuena,LIANG Zhixiong,YANG Linxiang,LIN Zhijun. Yield, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Nutrient Effects of Alginate Compound Fertilizer on Double-cropping Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 859-867. |
[4] | CHEN Jiaoyun,KHAN Qaisar,WEI Jianglu,TANG Lihua,DONG Dengfeng,LI Yangrui. Analysis of Physio-biochemical Characteristics of T2 α-tubulin SoTUA Transgenic Sugarcane [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 685-693. |
[5] | NONG Zemei,SHI Guoying,ZENG Quan,YE Xuelian,QIN Huadong,HU Chunjin. Analysis on Enzyme Activity and Microbial Community Diversity in Rhizosphere Soil of Different Sugarcane Varieties [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 819-828. |
[6] | LIN Changhua,ZHANG Shirong,WANG Jun,DING Xiaodong. Straw Returning and Optimized Nitrogen Application Improved Nitrogen Uptake, Soil C and N Transformation of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(1): 15-23. |
[7] | WANG Bingjie,JIANG Lei,PAN Bo,LIU Ying,LIN Yong. Effect of Glyphosate on the Activities of Antioxidase Enzymes and Acetylcholinesterases in Vivo Earthworm [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(9): 1804-1809. |
[8] | DUAN Chunyan,HE Chengxin,XU Guangping,HUANG Yuqing,LUO Yajin,TENG Qiumei,ZHANG Denan,ZHOU Longwu. Soil Nutrients and Biological Characteristics in Eucalyptus Plantations of Different Planting Ages at North Guangxi [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(6): 1213-1222. |
[9] | GUO Yuqiong,HUANG Daobin,LI Xiaozhen,ZHU Chen,ZHANG Shuting,FU Haifeng,ZHOU Chengzhe,OUYANG Mingqiu,CHEN Lan,LAI Zhongxiong. Cloning of Ascorbate Peroxidase Gene and Analysis of Its Gene Expression and Enzyme Activity of Somatic Embryogenesis in Camellia sinensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(5): 922-931. |
[10] | JI Xunzhi,LI Huanling,WANG Guo,GAO Zhaoyin,SUN Jinhua,WANG Jiabao. Changes of Sugar Contents and Related Enzyme Activities During Somatic Embryogenesis of Two Lychee Varieties [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(4): 675-680. |
[11] | PAN Cuiping,XIE Hongjiang,WANG Yongqing,ZHANG Hui,DENG Qunxian,YANG Zhiwu,WEN Lu,HE Shanshan. Physiological Responses and Evaluation of Cold Resistance under Cold Stress for Six Varieties of Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(12): 2369-2374. |
[12] | LI Wei, XIAO Xiou, LI Ke, LYU Lingling. Silicon Could Enhance the Resistance to Bacterial Wilt and Increase [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(8): 1540-1547. |
[13] | LI Jing, CHEN Ruizhou, LAN Zihan, LIN Dian. Effect of Organic Fertilizer Substituting Part of Inorganic Fertilizer on Physical and Chemical Properties, Enzyme Activity and Fruit Nutrient of Garden Soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(4): 656-660. |
[14] | LIU Mengmeng, HONG Liwei, LI Juan, CHEN Jiezhong, YAO Qing. The Anatomical Structure and Enzyme Activity of ‘Shatangju’Mandarin Grafted on Different Rootstocks [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(2): 209-216. |
[15] | ZHANG Yu, YAN Linling, YU Daogeng, TANG Jun, BAI Changjun. Evaluation and Selection of Cold Resistance of Stylosanthes Germplasm [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(10): 1887-1892. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||