Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 3008-3016.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.10.035
• Post-harvest Treatment & Quality Safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUO Yuxin1, GAN Panlu1, WANG Yujing1, ZHANG Xueyan1, WANG Xuchu1,2,*(), XIE Quanliang1,2,*(
)
Received:
2020-12-15
Revised:
2021-03-08
Online:
2021-10-25
Published:
2021-11-25
Contact:
WANG Xuchu,XIE Quanliang
CLC Number:
HUO Yuxin, GAN Panlu, WANG Yujing, ZHANG Xueyan, WANG Xuchu, XIE Quanliang. Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Different Precipitation Agents on Extraction of Plant Protein by Phenol Extract[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(10): 3008-3016.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.10.035
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of protein extraction based on different precipitants A: Fresh leaves of H. brasiliensis; B: Fresh latex of H. brasiliensis; C: Fresh leaves of S. portulacastrum
Fig. 3 1-DE images of total proteins extracted from leaf of Hevea leaves, latex and Sesuvium leaves results A: 1-DE image of Ammonium acetate solution precipitant; B: 1-DE image of Supersaturated ammonium sulfate methanol solution precipitant; C: 1-DE image of Acetone solution precipitant.
样品 Samples | 条带数 Number of protein bands | 样品 Samples | 条带数 Number of protein bands | 样品 Samples | 条带数 Number of protein bands |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAM-HL | 41±1.41 | SAM-LA | 35±0.63 | SAM-SL | 42±1.41 |
AA-HL | 29±2.45 | AA-LA | 28±2.42 | AA-SL | 31±1.50 |
AS-HL | 37±3.90 | AS-LA | 34±2.45 | AS-SL | 38±3.44 |
Tab. 1 Statistics of protein bands by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
样品 Samples | 条带数 Number of protein bands | 样品 Samples | 条带数 Number of protein bands | 样品 Samples | 条带数 Number of protein bands |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAM-HL | 41±1.41 | SAM-LA | 35±0.63 | SAM-SL | 42±1.41 |
AA-HL | 29±2.45 | AA-LA | 28±2.42 | AA-SL | 31±1.50 |
AS-HL | 37±3.90 | AS-LA | 34±2.45 | AS-SL | 38±3.44 |
编号a Number | 蛋白名称b Protein name | 登陆号c Accession number | 等电点/分子量(实验值/理论值)d pI/Mw (experimental/theoretical value) | 匹配肽段数/覆盖率e Matching peptide number/coverage rate/% | 分数f Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate arboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.32/50.2 | 6/22; 28% | 390 |
A1-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.49/48.9 | 6/47; 29% | 225 |
A1-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.06/52.1 | 6/48; 28% | 463 |
A2-1 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.80/22.0; 4.71/25.0 | 13/62; 21% | 94 |
A2-2 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.80/22.0; 4.88/24.0 | 14/37; 38% | 161 |
A2-3 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.80/22.0; 4.65/23.0 | 13/62; 21% | 94 |
A3-1 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 4.95/12.0 | 10/33; 30% | 125 |
A3-2 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.08/15.0 | 10/33; 30% | 126 |
A3-3 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.02/13.0 | 10/33; 30% | 125 |
A4-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AAA84059.1 | 6.26/53.8; 6.69/55.5 | 4/12; 33% | 366 |
A4-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ADG02945.1 | 6.26/52.9; 6.89/56.3 | 3/9; 27% | 277 |
A4-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AAA84059.1 | 6.26/53.8; 6.64/60.2 | 3/9; 33% | 264 |
B1-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.45/53.1 | 10/10; 26% | 542 |
B1-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.05/52.9 | 6/24; 25% | 497 |
B1-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.08/53.0 | 8/48; 28% | 809 |
B2-1 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.61/12.8 | 4/12; 61% | 455 |
B2-2 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.61/12.8 | 5/12; 55% | 410 |
B2-3 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.33/20.6 | 8/57; 58% | 558 |
B3-1 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.28/19.6 | 12/21; 34% | 494 |
B3-2 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.21/25.3 | 3/18; 31% | 483 |
B3-3 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 4.8/22.3 | 5/14; 38% | 319 |
B4-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AFY17050.1 | 6.70/53.2; 6.75/55.2 | 9/21; 26% | 663 |
B4-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ADD12830.1 | 6.16/52.6; 3.52/57.5 | 6/25; 26% | 781 |
B4-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | CAA04981.1 | 6.12/52.1; 6.89/39.7 | 3/13; 23% | 127 |
C1-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1| | 6.09/53.0; 6.16/53.2 | 7/19; 26% | 481 |
C1-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.42/51.5 | 6/23; 26% | 484 |
C1-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.01/53.0 | 6/24; 25% | 441 |
C2-1 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.58/21.5 | 10/21; 74% | 887 |
C2-2 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.8/22.3 | 10/21; 74% | 739 |
C2-3 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.64/22.3 | 5/35; 71% | 830 |
C3-1 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.28/19.6 | 5/27; 41% | 519 |
C3-2 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.04/14.7 | 5/14; 46% | 451 |
C3-3 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.04/14.7 | 5/14; 46% | 433 |
C4-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AAA84059.1 | 6.26/53.0; 6.03/50.6 | 7/42; 24% | 374 |
C4-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ADG02945.1 | 6.26/53.0; 6.06/52.1 | 6/25; 17% | 250 |
C4-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AAA84059.1 | 6.26/53.0; 6.06/52.1 | 6/48; 17% | 388 |
Tab. 2 List of sectional proteins with relatively high abundance identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS
编号a Number | 蛋白名称b Protein name | 登陆号c Accession number | 等电点/分子量(实验值/理论值)d pI/Mw (experimental/theoretical value) | 匹配肽段数/覆盖率e Matching peptide number/coverage rate/% | 分数f Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate arboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.32/50.2 | 6/22; 28% | 390 |
A1-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.49/48.9 | 6/47; 29% | 225 |
A1-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.06/52.1 | 6/48; 28% | 463 |
A2-1 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.80/22.0; 4.71/25.0 | 13/62; 21% | 94 |
A2-2 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.80/22.0; 4.88/24.0 | 14/37; 38% | 161 |
A2-3 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.80/22.0; 4.65/23.0 | 13/62; 21% | 94 |
A3-1 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 4.95/12.0 | 10/33; 30% | 125 |
A3-2 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.08/15.0 | 10/33; 30% | 126 |
A3-3 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.02/13.0 | 10/33; 30% | 125 |
A4-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AAA84059.1 | 6.26/53.8; 6.69/55.5 | 4/12; 33% | 366 |
A4-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ADG02945.1 | 6.26/52.9; 6.89/56.3 | 3/9; 27% | 277 |
A4-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AAA84059.1 | 6.26/53.8; 6.64/60.2 | 3/9; 33% | 264 |
B1-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.45/53.1 | 10/10; 26% | 542 |
B1-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.05/52.9 | 6/24; 25% | 497 |
B1-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.08/53.0 | 8/48; 28% | 809 |
B2-1 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.61/12.8 | 4/12; 61% | 455 |
B2-2 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.61/12.8 | 5/12; 55% | 410 |
B2-3 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.33/20.6 | 8/57; 58% | 558 |
B3-1 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.28/19.6 | 12/21; 34% | 494 |
B3-2 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.21/25.3 | 3/18; 31% | 483 |
B3-3 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 4.8/22.3 | 5/14; 38% | 319 |
B4-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AFY17050.1 | 6.70/53.2; 6.75/55.2 | 9/21; 26% | 663 |
B4-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ADD12830.1 | 6.16/52.6; 3.52/57.5 | 6/25; 26% | 781 |
B4-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | CAA04981.1 | 6.12/52.1; 6.89/39.7 | 3/13; 23% | 127 |
C1-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1| | 6.09/53.0; 6.16/53.2 | 7/19; 26% | 481 |
C1-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.42/51.5 | 6/23; 26% | 484 |
C1-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ref|YP_004327670.1 | 6.09/53.0; 6.01/53.0 | 6/24; 25% | 441 |
C2-1 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.58/21.5 | 10/21; 74% | 887 |
C2-2 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.8/22.3 | 10/21; 74% | 739 |
C2-3 | Small rubber particle protein | ref|XP_021653597.1 | 4.8/22.3; 4.64/22.3 | 5/35; 71% | 830 |
C3-1 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.28/19.6 | 5/27; 41% | 519 |
C3-2 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.04/14.7 | 5/14; 46% | 451 |
C3-3 | Rubber elongation factor | ref|XP_021653602.1 | 5.04/15.0; 5.04/14.7 | 5/14; 46% | 433 |
C4-1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AAA84059.1 | 6.26/53.0; 6.03/50.6 | 7/42; 24% | 374 |
C4-2 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | ADG02945.1 | 6.26/53.0; 6.06/52.1 | 6/25; 17% | 250 |
C4-3 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase | AAA84059.1 | 6.26/53.0; 6.06/52.1 | 6/48; 17% | 388 |
[1] |
Thiellement H, Bahrman N, Damerval C, et al. Proteomics for genetic and physiological studies in plants[J]. Electrophoresis, 1999, 20:2013-2026.
PMID |
[2] | Wang X. Protein and proteome atlas for plants under stresses: New highlights and ways for integrated omics in post-genomics era[J]. International Journal of Molecule Sciences, 2019, 20(20):5222. |
[3] |
Parkhey S, Chandrakar V, Naithani S C, et al. Efficient extraction of proteins from recalcitrant plant tissue for subsequent analysis by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis[J]. Journal of Separation Science, 2015, 38:3622-3628.
DOI URL |
[4] | Gallardo K, Job C, Groot S P, et al. Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis seed germination and priming[J]. Plant Physiology, 2001, 126:835-848. |
[5] |
Hoa le T P, Nomura M, Kajiwara H, et al. Proteomic analysis on symbiotic differentiation of mitochondria in soybean nodules[J]. Plant Cell Physiology, 2020, 45:300-308.
DOI URL |
[6] | Rabilloud T. How to use 2D gel electrophoresis in plant proteomics[J]. Methods Molecule Biology, 2014, 1072:43-50. |
[7] | Yang H, Liu N, Liu S. Determination of peptide and protein disulfide linkages by MALDI mass spectrometry[J]. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2013, 331:79-116. |
[8] |
Nahnsen S, Bielow C, Reinert K, et al. Tools for label-free peptide quantification[J]. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 2013, 12:549-556.
DOI PMID |
[9] |
Merrill A E, Coon J J. Quantifying proteomes and their post-translational modifications by stable isotope label-based mass spectrometry[J]. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2013, 17:779-786.
DOI PMID |
[10] |
Righetti P G, Boschetti E. Low-abundance plant protein enrichment with peptide libraries to enlarge proteome coverage and related applications[J]. Plant Science, 2020, 290:110302.
DOI PMID |
[11] |
Potin F, Lubbers S, Husson F, et al. Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) protein extraction conditions affect extraction yield and protein quality[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2019, 84(12):3682-3690.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Wang W, Tai F, Chen S. Optimizing protein extraction from plant tissues for enhanced proteomics analysis[J]. Journal of Separation Science, 2008, 31(11):2032-2039.
DOI PMID |
[13] |
Chapman B, Castellana N, Apffel A, et al. Plant proteogenomics: from protein extraction to improved gene predictions[J]. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2013, 1002:267-294.
DOI PMID |
[14] | Rode C, Winkelmann T, Braun H P, et al. DIGE analysis of plant tissue proteomes using a phenolic protein extraction method[J]. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2012, 854:335-342. |
[15] |
Wang W, Vignani R, Scali M, et al. A universal and rapid protocol for protein extraction from recalcitrant plant tissues for proteomic analysis[J]. Electrophoresis, 2006, 27(13):2782-2786.
PMID |
[16] | Plomion C, Lalanne C. Protein extraction from woody plants[J]. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2007, 355:37-41. |
[17] |
Vâlcu C M, Schlink K. Efficient extraction of proteins from woody plant samples for two-dimensional electrophoresis[J]. Proteomics, 2006, 6(14):4166-4175.
DOI URL |
[18] |
Branlard G, Bancel E. Protein extraction from cereal seeds[J]. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2007, 355:15-25.
PMID |
[19] |
Wu X, Gong F, Wang W. Protein extraction from plant tissues for 2DE and its application in proteomic analysis[J]. Proteomics, 2014, 14(6):645-658.
DOI URL |
[20] |
Conlon H E, Salter M G. Plant protein extraction[J]. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2007, 362:379-383.
PMID |
[21] |
Flengsrud R. Protein extraction from green plant tissue[J]. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2008, 425:149-152.
DOI PMID |
[22] |
Wang X C, Shi M J, Lu X L, et al. A method for protein extraction from different subcellular fractions of laticifer latex in Hevea brasiliensis compatible with 2-DE and MS[J]. Proteome Science, 2010, 8(1):35.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Wang D Y, Wang H Y, Han B, et al. Sodium instead of potassium and chloride is an important macronutrient to improve leaf succulence and shoot development for halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2012, 51(1):53-62.
DOI URL |
[24] |
Yi X, Sun Y, Yang Q, et al. Quantitative proteomics of Sesuvium portulacastrum leaves revealed that ion transportation by V-ATPase and sugar accumulation in chloroplast played crucial roles in halophyte salt tolerance[J]. Journal of Proteomics, 2014, 99:84-100.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Wang W, Scali M, Vignani R, et al. Protein extraction for two-dimensional electrophoresis from olive leaf, a plant tissue containing high levels of interfering compounds[J]. Electrophoresis, 2003, 24(14):2369-2375.
PMID |
[26] |
Jin X, Zhu L, Tao C, et al. An improved protein extraction method applied to cotton leaves is compatible with 2-DE and LC-MS[J]. BMC Genomics, 2019, 20(1):285.
DOI URL |
[27] |
Delgado E, Valverde-Quiroz L, Lopez D, et al. Characterization of soluble glandless cottonseed meal proteins based on electrophoresis, functional properties, and microscopic structure[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2019, 84(10):2820-2830.
DOI PMID |
[28] |
Akyüz A, Ersus S. Optimization of enzyme assisted extraction of protein from the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves for alternative plant protein concentrate production[J]. Food Chemistry, 2021, 335:127673.
DOI PMID |
[29] |
Wang X C, Chang L L, Wang B C, et al. Comparative proteomics of Thellungiella halophila leaves from plants subjected to salinity reveals the importance of chloroplastic starch and soluble sugars in halophyte salt tolerance[J]. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 2013, 12:2174-2195.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Aiello D, Siciliano C, Mazzotti F, et al. Protein extraction, enrichment and MALDI MS and MS/MS analysis from bitter orange leaves (Citrus aurantium)[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(7):1485.
DOI URL |
[31] | 李肖芳, 韩和平, 王旭初, 等. 适用于盐生植物的双向电泳样品制备方法[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(6):1848-1853. |
[1] | ZHANG Yiwen, LIU Hui, FENG Chengtian, HU Yiyu, WANG Zhenhui, YUAN Kun. Cloning and Expression Analysis of a β-cyanoalanine Synthase Gene HbCAS in Hevea brasiliensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(9): 2451-2457. |
[2] | LI Yan, YU Wencai, LU Qingzhi, YANG Shuguang, TIAN Weimin. Effects of Abiotic Stresses on the Expression of Heat Shock Transcription Factor (HSF) Family Members in Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(8): 2119-2125. |
[3] | Li Tao Zeng Lijuan Wang Jianhua Liu Zhixin. Establishment of Methods for the Extraction and Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis Analysis of Leaf Proteins of Areca catechu [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2009, 30(6): 746-750. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||