Analysis of Ratooning Ability for Sugarcane Families

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.07.016

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to analyze the genetic characteristics and parental characteristics of sugarcane ratooning ability, four family trials and one regional family trial were carried out. The ratooning ability of sugarcane was evaluated by variance analysis, correlation analysis, variance proportion and heritability. The ratooning ability of sugarcane could be affected by many factors, including sugarcane family, location, repetition and even the scale of trial. The location and interaction of location × family were most important for evaluation of sugarcane ratooning ability and followed by family. The proportion of family variance and parent additive variance and heritability were relatively low, belonging to low heritability traits. There was no positive correlation between ratooning ability and plant cane traits. The evaluation of excellent ratooning ability families and parents showed that there was no significant difference for the frequency of producing elite ratooning ability families among domestic parents and American parents. However, there were differences for ratooning ability among different type parents and the parents of Guitang, Yuetang and Yunnan was better than that of other types. For evaluation and selection of sugarcane ratooning ability, it is better to select in the ratoon crops with suitable location.

Key words: sugarcane, ratooning ability, family, heritability

CLC Number:

S566.1

YANG Rongzhong, ZHOU Hui, LIANG Qiang, TANG Shiyun, WANG Lunwang, GUI Yiyun, HUANG Hairong, HUANG Zanbing, XIAN Wu, LEI Jingchao. Analysis of Ratooning Ability for Sugarcane Families[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(7): 1932-1940.

Figures/Tables 10

References 22

[1]	苏广达, 吴伯烇. 宿根甘蔗生物学特性的综述[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 1980(12):10-13, 18.
[2]	Gravois K A, Zhou M M, Hoffmann H P, et al. Breeding new sugarcane varieties with enhanced ratooning ability[A]. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 2016(29):1683-1690.
[3]	张华, 苏俊波, 林兆里, 等. 机械化模式下不同追肥量对甘蔗品种产量的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2012, 33(8):1354-1358.
[4]	苏俊波, 孔冉, 罗炼芳, 等. 甘蔗机械化收获后的宿根性能分析[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2016(6):22-28.
[5]	覃伟, 吴才文, 赵俊, 等. 甘蔗宿根性研究Ⅱ.甘蔗种性宿根影响因子与其宿根性的关系[J]. 中国糖料, 2017, 39(1):1-3.
[6]	黄玉新, 段维兴, 张保青, 等. 138份国外引进甘蔗品种(系)宿根性评价[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 34(4):564-570.
[7]	李毅杰, 梁强, 董文斌, 等. 土壤压实对宿根甘蔗出苗及根系形成的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(9):2041-2047.
[8]	杨业彬, 韦开军, 邓思, 等. 适应机械收获的宿根甘蔗不同种植行距研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2019, 46(6):15-22.
[9]	Soopramanien G C. Agronomic and physiological aspects of sugarcane ratooning[A]. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 1996, 22(2):1-6.
[10]	Ferraris R, Chapman L, Ludlow M M. Ratooning ability of cane varieties: interception of light and efficiency of light use[A]. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. 1993(15):316-322.
[11]	周建阳, 朱艳, 李尚平, 等. 砍蔗刀盘切割深度对宿根破头率影响的研究[J]. 农机化研究, 2015, 37(2):186-189.
[12]	Chapman L S, Ferraris R, Ludlow M M. Ratooning ability of cane varieties: variation in yield and yield components[A]. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 1992(14):130-138.
[13]	Ferraris R, Chapman L. The dynamics of bud development in ratooning stubble of sugar cane varieties[A]. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 1991(13):164-171.
[14]	Marin F R, Rattalino Edreira J I, Andrade J, et al. On-farm sugarcane yield and yield components as influenced by number of harvests[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019(240):134-142.
[15]	Milligan S B, Gravois K A, Martin F A. Inheritance of sugarcane ratooning ability and the relationship of younger crop traits to older crop traits[J]. Crop Science, 1996(36):45-50.
[16]	Bischoff K P, Gravois K A. The development of new sugarcane varieties at the LSU AgCenter[J]. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 2004(24):142-16.
[17]	Zhou M M, Shoko M D. Simultaneous selection for yield and ratooning ability in sugarcane genotypes using analysis of covariance[J]. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 2012, 29(2):93-100. DOI URL
[18]	Zhou M M. Minimum detectable differences for cane yield, sucrose content and sugar yield among the midlands and coastal short cycle breeding programmes in South Africa[J]. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 2015, 32(3):175-182. DOI URL
[19]	杨荣仲. 甘蔗宿根性与抗寒性初探[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 1996(6):13-17.
[20]	邓祖湖, 林彦铨. 不同选择方法对甘蔗宿根性的选择效果分析[J]. 福建农业科技, 2000(S1):60-61.
[21]	Atkin F C, Dieters M J, Stringer J K. Impact of depth of pedigree and inclusion of historical data on the estimation of additive variance and breeding values in a sugarcane breeding program[J]. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 2009, 119(3):555-565.
[22]	周会, 雷敬超, 王伦旺, 等. 2008~2009年广西甘蔗品种区域试验报告[J]. 南方农业学报, 2012, 43(3):306-310.

试验代号 Trial code	试验年度 Year	试验组合数 Cross number	母本 Female number	父本 Male number	亲本数 Parent number	试验地点 Location
试验1	2012—2013	78	50	48	84	丁当（赤红壤,南亚热带湿润季风气候）
试验2	2012—2013	38	32	31	60
试验3	2012—2013	77	53	42	84
试验4	2017—2018	199	92	104	168
试验5	2017—2018	100	69	71	78	丁当,扶绥（红壤,南亚热带湿润季风气候）,兴宾（沙壤土,亚热带季风气候）
合计		489	213	203	335	丁当,扶绥（红壤,南亚热带湿润季风气候）,兴宾（沙壤土,亚热带季风气候）

试验代号 Trial code	试验年度 Year	试验组合数 Cross number	母本 Female number	父本 Male number	亲本数 Parent number	试验地点 Location
试验1	2012—2013	78	50	48	84	丁当（赤红壤,南亚热带湿润季风气候）
试验2	2012—2013	38	32	31	60
试验3	2012—2013	77	53	42	84
试验4	2017—2018	199	92	104	168
试验5	2017—2018	100	69	71	78	丁当,扶绥（红壤,南亚热带湿润季风气候）,兴宾（沙壤土,亚热带季风气候）
合计		489	213	203	335	丁当,扶绥（红壤,南亚热带湿润季风气候）,兴宾（沙壤土,亚热带季风气候）

性状 Traits	试验1 Trial 1		试验2 Trial 2		试验3 Trial 3		试验4 Trial 4		试验5 Trial 5
性状 Traits	均方MS	概率p	均方MS	概率p	均方MS	概率p	均方MS	概率p	均方MS	概率p
宿根发株率	0.604	0.0448	0.659	0.0086	0.620	0.0789	0.157	1.8E-05	0.117	0.0001
株高	0.033	0.0008	0.034	0.0007	0.034	0.0020	0.033	0.0827	0.071	0.0554
茎径	0.009	0.0128	0.011	0.0537	0.009	0.0344	0.015	0.0317	0.018	6.6E-05
丛茎数	0.311	0.1239	0.182	0.7657	0.233	0.0421	0.125	0.1116	0.152	0.0046
锤度	0.007	0.0009	0.005	0.1039	0.007	0.0001	0.005	0.0148	0.009	2.0E-10
蔗产量	2.191	0.00799	4.609	3.5E-08	2.904	0.0009	0.594	0.0540	1.173	1.3E-05
锤重	2.101	0.0032	4.5288	9.3E-09	2.788	0.0020	0.5816	0.0727	1.185	2.8E-06
行茎数	0.146	0.0858	0.2338	0.0007	0.2514	0.1414	0.0766	0.1126	0.127	4.2E-05
行丛数	0.022	0.0312	0.0257	0.0003	0.0298	0.0193	0.1876	8.9E-05	0.035	0.0586

性状 Traits	试验1 Trial 1		试验2 Trial 2		试验3 Trial 3		试验4 Trial 4		试验5 Trial 5
性状 Traits	均方MS	概率p	均方MS	概率p	均方MS	概率p	均方MS	概率p	均方MS	概率p
宿根发株率	0.604	0.0448	0.659	0.0086	0.620	0.0789	0.157	1.8E-05	0.117	0.0001
株高	0.033	0.0008	0.034	0.0007	0.034	0.0020	0.033	0.0827	0.071	0.0554
茎径	0.009	0.0128	0.011	0.0537	0.009	0.0344	0.015	0.0317	0.018	6.6E-05
丛茎数	0.311	0.1239	0.182	0.7657	0.233	0.0421	0.125	0.1116	0.152	0.0046
锤度	0.007	0.0009	0.005	0.1039	0.007	0.0001	0.005	0.0148	0.009	2.0E-10
蔗产量	2.191	0.00799	4.609	3.5E-08	2.904	0.0009	0.594	0.0540	1.173	1.3E-05
锤重	2.101	0.0032	4.5288	9.3E-09	2.788	0.0020	0.5816	0.0727	1.185	2.8E-06
行茎数	0.146	0.0858	0.2338	0.0007	0.2514	0.1414	0.0766	0.1126	0.127	4.2E-05
行丛数	0.022	0.0312	0.0257	0.0003	0.0298	0.0193	0.1876	8.9E-05	0.035	0.0586

新植	性状 Traits	株高 PH	茎径 SD	丛茎数 NMCC	锤度 Brix	蔗产量 CY	锤重 BY	行茎数NMCR	行丛数NCR	5%显著性值 5% SV
	试验1	-0.4816	-0.1757	-0.3594	0.1502	-0.8049	-0.8094	-0.7911	-0.1643	0.1274
	试验2	-0.6245	-0.1331	-0.3241	0.0817	-0.8232	-0.8216	-0.8372	0.076	0.1801
	试验3	-0.4915	-0.0967	-0.311	-0.0232	-0.7963	-0.7784	-0.7661	-0.0989	0.1274
	试验4	-0.3241	-0.2472	-0.2372	-0.0036	-0.3908	-0.3902	-0.3086	-0.1973	0.0804
	试验5	-0.3561	-0.0004	-0.1369	0.1449	-0.3233	-0.3027	-0.2229	-0.2268	0.0657
宿根	性状 Traits	株高 PH	茎径 SD	丛茎数 NMCC	锤度 Brix	锤重 BY	行茎数NMCR	行丛数NCR	宿根发株率RR	1%显著性值 1% SV
	试验1	0.4605	0.2265	0.1024	-0.1793	0.9760	0.5342	-0.138	0.4761	0.1671
	试验2	0.6641	0.3105	0.058	-0.1552	0.9873	0.4881	-0.3937	0.3824	0.2363
	试验3	0.4985	0.2494	0.1706	-0.1614	0.9890	0.6907	-0.1893	0.5311	0.1671
	试验4	0.7807	0.6926	0.4938	-0.0654	0.9920	0.8068	0.4486	0.5811	0.1056
	试验5	0.4994	0.3245	0.4474	-0.1051	0.9837	0.7381	0.4479	0.2937	0.0863