Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 1071-1079.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.04.024
• Plant Protection & Bio-safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIN Zhaoli1, ZHANG Hua1, LUO Jun1, GAO Shiwu1, YAO Junli2, XU Liping1,*()
Received:
2020-05-05
Revised:
2020-06-23
Online:
2021-04-25
Published:
2021-04-25
Contact:
XU Liping
CLC Number:
LIN Zhaoli, ZHANG Hua, LUO Jun, GAO Shiwu, YAO Junli, XU Liping. Effect of Silicon Fertilizer on Sugarcane Production and Its Resistance to Stalk Borer[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(4): 1071-1079.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.04.024
处理 Treatments | 叶片硅含量 Leaf Si content/(mg·g-1) | 螟害枯心率 Dead heart rate/% |
---|---|---|
T0 | 7.90±0.13c | 7.18±0.11a |
T1 | 8.42±0.15b | 4.48±0.58b |
T2 | 8.35±0.05b | 3.99±0.26b |
T3 | 9.30±0.29a | 2.32±0.54c |
T4 | 9.21±0.31a | 1.79±0.26c |
均值 | 8.64 | 3.95 |
变异系数/% | 6.94 | 53.6 |
F值 | 24.16** | 87.11** |
Tab. 1 Sugarcane resistance to stalk borer at seeding stage under different silicon fertilizer dosages
处理 Treatments | 叶片硅含量 Leaf Si content/(mg·g-1) | 螟害枯心率 Dead heart rate/% |
---|---|---|
T0 | 7.90±0.13c | 7.18±0.11a |
T1 | 8.42±0.15b | 4.48±0.58b |
T2 | 8.35±0.05b | 3.99±0.26b |
T3 | 9.30±0.29a | 2.32±0.54c |
T4 | 9.21±0.31a | 1.79±0.26c |
均值 | 8.64 | 3.95 |
变异系数/% | 6.94 | 53.6 |
F值 | 24.16** | 87.11** |
处理 Treatments | 叶片硅含量 Leaf Si content/(mg·g-1) | 蔗皮硅含量 Stem epidermis Si content/(mg·g-1) | 蔗茎硅含量 Stalk Si content/(mg·g-1) | 抗条螟性指标Resistance indexes of stalk borer | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
每株螟害节数 Number of bored internodes per plant | 螟害节率 Bored internodes rate/% | 枯梢率 Dieback rate/% | 每株累积蛀道长度 Length of cumulative tunnels per plant/cm | 节蛀道长度 Length of tunnels per bored internodes/cm | 羽化率 Adult emergence rate/% | ||||
T0 | 5.56±0.34c | 2.52±0.08b | 2.32±0.18b | 2.94±0.24a | 14.07±1.17a | 30.00±5.00a | 44.30±3.91a | 2.63±0.16a | 83.52±1.02a |
T1 | 6.12±0.46bc | 2.48±0.04b | 2.53±0.06ab | 2.81±0.56a | 14.33±1.85a | 27.11±2.59a | 42.13±15.57a | 2.52±0.24a | 83.13±9.16a |
T2 | 7.03±0.75a | 2.75±0.13a | 2.56±0.22ab | 2.15±0.26b | 10.84±1.31b | 15.82±0.83b | 25.27±3.59b | 2.46±0.17a | 73.71±4.68a |
T3 | 7.32±0.33a | 2.87±0.17a | 2.73±0.13a | 2.11±0.25b | 9.88±1.17b | 10.00±5.00b | 22.53±9.85b | 1.71±0.29b | 59.30±6.78b |
T4 | 6.73±0.33ab | 2.73±0.04a | 2.53±0.09ab | 1.82±0.08b | 8.87±0.39b | 13.51±5.63b | 16.93±3.71b | 1.71±0.09b | 59.33±2.81b |
均值 | 6.55 | 2.67 | 2.53 | 2.37 | 11.60 | 19.29 | 30.23 | 2.21 | 71.80 |
变异 系数/% | 10.82 | 6.30 | 5.76 | 20.45 | 21.35 | 45.47 | 40.52 | 20.76 | 16.79 |
F值 | 6.77** | 2.82 | 7.67** | 11.43** | 6.91** | 12.95** | 5.91* | 15.07** | 13.56** |
Tab. 2 Sugarcane resistance to stalk borer at technically matured stage under different silicon fertilizer dosages
处理 Treatments | 叶片硅含量 Leaf Si content/(mg·g-1) | 蔗皮硅含量 Stem epidermis Si content/(mg·g-1) | 蔗茎硅含量 Stalk Si content/(mg·g-1) | 抗条螟性指标Resistance indexes of stalk borer | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
每株螟害节数 Number of bored internodes per plant | 螟害节率 Bored internodes rate/% | 枯梢率 Dieback rate/% | 每株累积蛀道长度 Length of cumulative tunnels per plant/cm | 节蛀道长度 Length of tunnels per bored internodes/cm | 羽化率 Adult emergence rate/% | ||||
T0 | 5.56±0.34c | 2.52±0.08b | 2.32±0.18b | 2.94±0.24a | 14.07±1.17a | 30.00±5.00a | 44.30±3.91a | 2.63±0.16a | 83.52±1.02a |
T1 | 6.12±0.46bc | 2.48±0.04b | 2.53±0.06ab | 2.81±0.56a | 14.33±1.85a | 27.11±2.59a | 42.13±15.57a | 2.52±0.24a | 83.13±9.16a |
T2 | 7.03±0.75a | 2.75±0.13a | 2.56±0.22ab | 2.15±0.26b | 10.84±1.31b | 15.82±0.83b | 25.27±3.59b | 2.46±0.17a | 73.71±4.68a |
T3 | 7.32±0.33a | 2.87±0.17a | 2.73±0.13a | 2.11±0.25b | 9.88±1.17b | 10.00±5.00b | 22.53±9.85b | 1.71±0.29b | 59.30±6.78b |
T4 | 6.73±0.33ab | 2.73±0.04a | 2.53±0.09ab | 1.82±0.08b | 8.87±0.39b | 13.51±5.63b | 16.93±3.71b | 1.71±0.09b | 59.33±2.81b |
均值 | 6.55 | 2.67 | 2.53 | 2.37 | 11.60 | 19.29 | 30.23 | 2.21 | 71.80 |
变异 系数/% | 10.82 | 6.30 | 5.76 | 20.45 | 21.35 | 45.47 | 40.52 | 20.76 | 16.79 |
F值 | 6.77** | 2.82 | 7.67** | 11.43** | 6.91** | 12.95** | 5.91* | 15.07** | 13.56** |
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 施硅量 Application amount | 叶片硅含量 Leaf Si content | 蔗皮硅含量 Stem epidermis Si content | 蔗茎硅含量 Stalk Si content | 螟害节数 Number of bored internodes | 螟害节率 Bored internodes rate | 枯梢率 Dieback rate | 累积蛀道长度 Length of cumulative tunnels | 节蛀道长度 Length of tunnels per bored internodes | 羽化率 Adult emergence rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施硅量 | 0.67** | 0.67** | 0.49 | -0.82** | -0.86** | -0.83** | -0.80** | -0.85** | -0.87** | |
叶片硅含量 | 0.67** | 0.57* | 0.54* | -0.64* | -0.67** | -0.82** | -0.54* | -0.46 | -0.62* | |
蔗皮硅含量 | 0.67** | 0.57* | 0.47 | -0.59* | -0.66** | -0.79** | -0.62* | -0.74** | -0.81** | |
蔗茎硅含量 | 0.49 | 0.54* | 0.47 | -0.41 | -0.40 | -0.54* | -0.37 | -0.35 | -0.48 |
Tab. 3 Correlation analysis between sugarcane silicon content and resistance indexes of stalk borer at technically matured stage
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 施硅量 Application amount | 叶片硅含量 Leaf Si content | 蔗皮硅含量 Stem epidermis Si content | 蔗茎硅含量 Stalk Si content | 螟害节数 Number of bored internodes | 螟害节率 Bored internodes rate | 枯梢率 Dieback rate | 累积蛀道长度 Length of cumulative tunnels | 节蛀道长度 Length of tunnels per bored internodes | 羽化率 Adult emergence rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施硅量 | 0.67** | 0.67** | 0.49 | -0.82** | -0.86** | -0.83** | -0.80** | -0.85** | -0.87** | |
叶片硅含量 | 0.67** | 0.57* | 0.54* | -0.64* | -0.67** | -0.82** | -0.54* | -0.46 | -0.62* | |
蔗皮硅含量 | 0.67** | 0.57* | 0.47 | -0.59* | -0.66** | -0.79** | -0.62* | -0.74** | -0.81** | |
蔗茎硅含量 | 0.49 | 0.54* | 0.47 | -0.41 | -0.40 | -0.54* | -0.37 | -0.35 | -0.48 |
指标 Indexes | F1 | F2 | F3 | 提取率 Extraction rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
螟害枯心率 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.73 | 96.27 |
螟害节数 | 0.90 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 98.12 |
螟害节率 | 0.86 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 96.35 |
枯梢率 | 0.71 | 0.50 | 0.36 | 87.88 |
累积蛀道长度 | 0.80 | 0.51 | 0.07 | 89.97 |
节蛀道长度 | 0.34 | 0.88 | 0.25 | 94.98 |
羽化率 | 0.34 | 0.87 | 0.30 | 95.24 |
方差贡献率/% | 44.23 | 35.00 | 14.89 | |
累计方差贡献率/% | 44.23 | 79.23 | 94.12 |
Tab. 4 Rotated factor loading matrix of stalk borer resistance indexes
指标 Indexes | F1 | F2 | F3 | 提取率 Extraction rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
螟害枯心率 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.73 | 96.27 |
螟害节数 | 0.90 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 98.12 |
螟害节率 | 0.86 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 96.35 |
枯梢率 | 0.71 | 0.50 | 0.36 | 87.88 |
累积蛀道长度 | 0.80 | 0.51 | 0.07 | 89.97 |
节蛀道长度 | 0.34 | 0.88 | 0.25 | 94.98 |
羽化率 | 0.34 | 0.87 | 0.30 | 95.24 |
方差贡献率/% | 44.23 | 35.00 | 14.89 | |
累计方差贡献率/% | 44.23 | 79.23 | 94.12 |
处理 Treatments | 因子得分Factor score | 螟害因子Y综合得分 Borer damage factor comprehensive score | 排序 Order | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
T0 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 1.37 | 0.65 | 1 |
T1 | 0.98 | 0.64 | -0.49 | 0.59 | 2 |
T2 | -0.76 | 0.63 | 0.08 | -0.10 | 3 |
T3 | -0.18 | -1.02 | -0.44 | -0.50 | 4 |
T4 | -0.66 | -0.74 | -0.52 | -0.63 | 5 |
Tab. 5 The comprehensive scores of borer damage factors under different silicon fertilizer dosages
处理 Treatments | 因子得分Factor score | 螟害因子Y综合得分 Borer damage factor comprehensive score | 排序 Order | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
T0 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 1.37 | 0.65 | 1 |
T1 | 0.98 | 0.64 | -0.49 | 0.59 | 2 |
T2 | -0.76 | 0.63 | 0.08 | -0.10 | 3 |
T3 | -0.18 | -1.02 | -0.44 | -0.50 | 4 |
T4 | -0.66 | -0.74 | -0.52 | -0.63 | 5 |
处理 Treatments | 单茎重 Weigh per stalk/kg | 每公顷有效茎数 Stalk number per hectare | 成茎率 Stalk forming rate/% | 蔗茎产量 Stalk yield /(t·hm-2) | 田间锤度 Brix/% | 成本投入 Cost input /(yuan?hm-2) | 产出 Output /(yuan·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | 1.09±0.12b | 50 803±2719b | 57.84±5.46a | 55.16±4.14c | 19.20±0.10a | 0 | 28 683 |
T1 | 1.27±0.08ab | 53 360±3699b | 58.17±2.16a | 67.38±0.72b | 18.80±0.59a | 282 | 34 756 |
T2 | 1.24±0.01ab | 54 215±3603b | 59.66±3.17a | 66.94±4.18b | 19.33±0.35a | 563 | 34 246 |
T3 | 1.33±0.04a | 62 424±4483a | 59.67±3.67a | 83.05±3.78a | 18.77±0.50a | 844 | 42 342 |
T4 | 1.32±0.15a | 62 253±4364a | 59.68±4.11a | 81.93±9.42a | 19.07±0.20a | 1125 | 41 479 |
Tab. 6 Traits of sugarcane stalk yield under different silicon fertilizer dosage
处理 Treatments | 单茎重 Weigh per stalk/kg | 每公顷有效茎数 Stalk number per hectare | 成茎率 Stalk forming rate/% | 蔗茎产量 Stalk yield /(t·hm-2) | 田间锤度 Brix/% | 成本投入 Cost input /(yuan?hm-2) | 产出 Output /(yuan·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | 1.09±0.12b | 50 803±2719b | 57.84±5.46a | 55.16±4.14c | 19.20±0.10a | 0 | 28 683 |
T1 | 1.27±0.08ab | 53 360±3699b | 58.17±2.16a | 67.38±0.72b | 18.80±0.59a | 282 | 34 756 |
T2 | 1.24±0.01ab | 54 215±3603b | 59.66±3.17a | 66.94±4.18b | 19.33±0.35a | 563 | 34 246 |
T3 | 1.33±0.04a | 62 424±4483a | 59.67±3.67a | 83.05±3.78a | 18.77±0.50a | 844 | 42 342 |
T4 | 1.32±0.15a | 62 253±4364a | 59.68±4.11a | 81.93±9.42a | 19.07±0.20a | 1125 | 41 479 |
自变量X Independent variable X | 与Y的简单相关系数 Correlation coefficients | 直接通径系数 Direct path coefficients | 间接通径系数Indirect path coefficients | 决策系数 Decision coefficients | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
枯心率 Dead heart rate | 累积蛀道长度 Length of cumulative tunnels | ||||
枯心率 | -0.87 | -0.51 | -0.36 | 0.62 | |
累积蛀道长度 | -0.86 | -0.47 | -0.39 | 0.59 |
Tab. 7 Effect analysis between the related resistance indexes of stalk borer and stalk yield
自变量X Independent variable X | 与Y的简单相关系数 Correlation coefficients | 直接通径系数 Direct path coefficients | 间接通径系数Indirect path coefficients | 决策系数 Decision coefficients | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
枯心率 Dead heart rate | 累积蛀道长度 Length of cumulative tunnels | ||||
枯心率 | -0.87 | -0.51 | -0.36 | 0.62 | |
累积蛀道长度 | -0.86 | -0.47 | -0.39 | 0.59 |
处理 Treatments | 叶倾角 Leaf inclination angle/° | 茎皮硬度 Stem epidermis hardness/HD | 蔗皮纤维分 Stem epidermis fiber/% | 蔗茎纤维分 Stalk fiber/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | 67.17±2.57a | 25.28±0.50b | 34.82±6.88a | 14.58±1.91a |
T1 | 64.50±5.63a | 26.89±5.01ab | 33.00±1.48a | 14.99±1.21a |
T2 | 64.67±2.84a | 29.19±3.43ab | 32.10±1.88a | 12.79±2.50a |
T3 | 63.17±2.31a | 31.20±3.36a | 31.38±0.62a | 13.21±3.24a |
T4 | 60.17±3.82a | 33.99±0.60a | 31.39±2.50a | 12.43±2.86a |
Tab. 8 Sugarcane agronomic traits under different silicon fertilizer dosages
处理 Treatments | 叶倾角 Leaf inclination angle/° | 茎皮硬度 Stem epidermis hardness/HD | 蔗皮纤维分 Stem epidermis fiber/% | 蔗茎纤维分 Stalk fiber/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | 67.17±2.57a | 25.28±0.50b | 34.82±6.88a | 14.58±1.91a |
T1 | 64.50±5.63a | 26.89±5.01ab | 33.00±1.48a | 14.99±1.21a |
T2 | 64.67±2.84a | 29.19±3.43ab | 32.10±1.88a | 12.79±2.50a |
T3 | 63.17±2.31a | 31.20±3.36a | 31.38±0.62a | 13.21±3.24a |
T4 | 60.17±3.82a | 33.99±0.60a | 31.39±2.50a | 12.43±2.86a |
[1] | 黎焕光, 谭裕模, 谭芳, 等. 甘蔗生长中后期螟害对甘蔗品质的影响[J]. 广西蔗糖, 2007(3):11-16. |
[2] | 周明祥. 作物抗虫性原理及应用[M]. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1992: 7- 19, 133-146. |
[3] | White W H, Tew T L, Richard E P. Association of sugarcane pith, rind hardness, and fiber with resistance to the sugarcane borer[J]. Journal of American Society Sugar Cane Technology, 2006,26:87-100. |
[4] | Matichenkov V V, Calvert D V. Silicon as a beneficial element for sugarcane[J]. Journal of American Society of Sugarcane Technology, 2002,22:21-29. |
[5] | 朱永兴, 夏雨晨, 刘乐承, 等. 外源硅对植物抗盐性影响的研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(3):498-509. |
[6] |
Bokhtiar S M, Huang H R, Li Y R. Response of sugarcane to calcium silicate on yield, gas exchange characteristics, leaf nutrient concentrations, and soil properties in two different soils[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2012,43(10):1363-1381.
DOI URL |
[7] | 宫海军, 陈坤明, 王锁民, 等. 植物硅营养的研究进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004,24(12):2385-2392. |
[8] | 韩永强, 魏春光, 侯茂林. 硅对植物抗虫性的影响及其机制[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(3):974-983. |
[9] |
Kvedaras O L, Byrne M J, Coombes N E, et al. Influence of plant silicon and sugarcane cultivar on mandibular wear in the stalk borer Eldana saccharina[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2009,11(3):301-306.
DOI URL |
[10] | Anderson D L, Sosa O J. Effect of silicon on expression of resistance to sugarcane borer (Diatraea saccharalis)[J]. Journal American Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 2001,21:43-50. |
[11] |
Nikpay A, Nejadian E S, Goldasteh S, et al. Efficacy of silicon formulations on sugarcane stalk borers, quality characteristics and parasitism rate on five commercial varieties[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2017,87(2):289-297.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Nikpay A. Improving biological control of stalk borers in sugarcane by applying silicon as a soil amendment[J]. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 2016,56(4):394-401.
DOI URL |
[13] | Keeping M G, Miles N, Sewpersad C. Silicon reduces impact of plant nitrogen in promoting stalk borer (Eldana saccharina) but not sugarcane thrips (Fulmekiola serrata) infestations in sugarcane[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014,5:1-12. |
[14] | 林兆里, 许莉萍, 高三基, 等. 基于因子分析和聚类分析的甘蔗品种抗螟性评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015,36(7):1312-1318. |
[15] | 王继朋, 王贺, 张福锁, 等. 温度对钼蓝比色法测定植物样品中硅的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2004,35(2):169-172. |
[16] | 杜家菊, 陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2010,45(2):4-6. |
[17] |
White W H, Viator R P, Duferene E O, et al. Re-evaluation of sugarcane borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) bioeconomics in Louisana[J]. Crop Protection, 2008,27(9):1256-1261.
DOI URL |
[18] | 苏广达, 叶振邦, 吴伯烇, 等. 甘蔗栽培生物学[M]. 北京: 轻工业出版社, 1983: 449-450. |
[19] | Miles N, Rhodes R. Guidelines for the interpretation of leaf analyses for sugarcane[R]. African Sugarcane Research Institute, Mt. Edgecombe, South Africa, 2008: Information Sheet 7:17. |
[20] |
Keeping M G, Meyer J H. Calcium silicate enhances resistance of sugarcane to the African stalk borer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2002,4(4):265-274.
DOI URL |
[21] |
Meyer J H, Keeping M G, Sewpersad C. Soil silicon amendments increase resistance of sugarcane to stalk borer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) under field conditions[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013,363(1/2):297-318.
DOI URL |
[22] |
Keeping M G, Meyer J H. Silicon-mediated resistance of sugarcane to Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Effects of silicon source and cultivar[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2006,130(8):410-420.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Kvedaras O L, Keeping M G, Goebel F R, et al. Water stress augments silicon-mediated resistance of susceptible sugarcane cultivars to the stalk borer Eldana saccharina (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)[J]. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2007,97(2):175-183.
DOI URL |
[24] | 韩永强, 弓少龙, 文礼章, 等. 水稻施用硅肥对稻纵卷叶螟幼虫取食和成虫产卵选择性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(5):1623-1629. |
[25] |
Reynolds O L, Padula M P, Zeng R S, et al. Silicon: Potential to promote direct and indirect effects on plant defense against arthropod pests in agriculture[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016,7:744.
DOI PMID |
[26] | 柏丽华, 王小奇, 田春晖, 等. 不同水稻品种对稻水象甲取食选择性的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2005,36(5):562-565. |
[27] | 任大方, 龚恒亮, 李金玉, 等. 甘蔗对螟虫抗性的初步研究[C]//任大方. 甘蔗品种选育技术论文集. 广州: 轻工部甘蔗糖业科学研究所, 1994: 150-157. |
[28] | Keeping M G, Rutherford R S. Resistance mechanisms of South African sugarcane to the African stalk borer Eldana saccharina (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): A review[J]. African Sugar Technologist Association, 2004,78:307-311. |
[29] | Keeping M G, Meyer J H. Impact of silicon in alleviating biotic stress in sugarcane in South Africa: A review[J]. Sugar Cane International, 2005,23(2):14-18. |
[30] | Kaufman P B, Takeoka Y, Carlson T J, et al. Studies on silica deposition in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) using scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, neutron activation analysis, and light microscopy[J]. Phytomorphology, 1979,29(2):185-193. |
[31] |
Kvedaras O L, Keeping M G. Silicon impedes stalk penetration by the borer Eldana saccharina in sugarcane[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2007,125(1):103-110.
DOI URL |
[32] | 蒋雄英, 陈桂芬, 尹辉, 等. 硅肥对甘蔗的生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014,27(6):2460-2464. |
[33] |
Camargo M S D, Korndorfer G H, Wyler P. Silicate fertilization of sugarcane cultivated in tropical soils[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014,167:64-75.
DOI URL |
[1] | TAN Fang, YANG Rongzhong, JING Yan, LEI Jingchao, WANG Lunwang, ZHOU Hui. Screening of Sugarcane Parents and Crosses by Combining Ability Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(4): 958-965. |
[2] | LIANG Qiang, LIU Xiaoyan, LI Yijie, LIN Li, WANG Zeping, LI Xiang, SONG Xiupeng, ZHOU Hui, LIN Shanhai, LI Yangrui. Growth and Decline of Sugarcane Cultivar ‘ROC22’ in Guangxi Sugarcane Area from 2008 to 2017 [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(4): 982-990. |
[3] | AN Dongsheng, YAN Chengming, CHEN Xuan, XU Lei, LIU Yang, SU Junbo, KONG Ran, DOU Meian. Effect of Agronomic Water Saving Measures on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane under Seasonal Drought [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(4): 991-999. |
[4] | LI Suli, HUANG Jinling, WEI Benhui, LIANG Xiaoying, LU Ruijie, WANG Lingqiang, LI Zhigang. Effects of Fenlong Tillage on Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Sugarcane (Saccharumofficinarum) [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(3): 726-731. |
[5] | ZENG Qiaoying, WU Jiayun, FENG Xiaoming, ZHANG Nannan, WU Zilin, QI Yongwen. Different Responses to Low Potassium Stress Between Two Sugarcane Varieties from the Same Hybrid Combination [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(3): 739-746. |
[6] | SU Lirong, TAN Yumo, HE Tieguang, QIN Fang, LI Qin, ZENG Chengcheng, LI Zhongyi, TANG Hongqin, WEI Caihui, DONG Wenbin. Experimental study and Economic Benefit Analysis of Different Green Manures Intercropping and Green Manure Returning in Newly Planted Sugarcane [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(3): 747-753. |
[7] | GAN Yimei, WU Yuanli, YANG Benpeng, CAI Wenwei, ZENG Jun, PENG Lishun, CAO Zhengying. Breeding of a New Sugarcane Variety ‘Zhongtang No. 2’ with High Resistance to Smut [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(3): 816-821. |
[8] | HUANG Zhenyong, LIAO Caixue, WANG Dongmei, LIANG Xiaojun, WEI Xinping, DAN Ming, ZHANG Ezhen. Technology of Sugarcane Caudate Lobe Feed Production by Sectional Soli-State Fermentation [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(3): 862-868. |
[9] | XU Zhijun, KONG Ran, SU Junbo, ZHOU Feng, ZHANG Chuiming, WU Xiaoli, LIU Yang. Construction of Sugarcane F1 Population and Main Agronomic Traits Genetic Variation Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(2): 333-338. |
[10] | LIU Hongjian, LI Song, HE Weizhong, LIU Junxian, LIU Limin, LU Manman, YOU Jianhua, HUANG Chenghua, LIN Shanhai. Isolation and Identification of Two Bacteria Contaminated Sugarcane Tissue Culture Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(2): 519-526. |
[11] | DI Yining, LI Zichao, XIE Linyan, LIU Lufeng, GU Shujie, MA Hao, LI Fusheng, HE Lilian. Impact of Endophyte Inoculation on the Growth of Different Sugarcane Varieties [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(1): 149-158. |
[12] | XU Lin, YANG Huimin, WU Kaichao, DENG Zhinian, ZHANG Ronghua, PANG Tian, HUANG Chengfeng, LI Nan, HUANG Hairong, WANG Weizan. Effect of Cryopreservation for Coating Agents on Single Bud of Sugarcane Seedcane [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(1): 78-84. |
[13] | YANG Shaolin, DENG Jun, LI Rudan, FAN Xian, QUAN Yiji, ZHANG Yuebin, DAO Jingmei. Differences Stability Analysis of Mineral Nutrient Content and Quality Index of Chewing Sugarcane [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(1): 92-101. |
[14] | HUANG Zhenrui,ZHOU Wenling,AO Junhua,CHEN Diwen,HUANG Ying,JIANG Yong,LI Qiwei. Sugarcane Yield and Soil Potassium Balance in Potassium Application of Four Consecutive Years [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1347-1353. |
[15] | XU Xia,GOU Yonggang,LUO Shasha,WANG Yushu,YU Lingling,WANG Jianwu. Effect of Nitrogen Reduction on Yield Stability of Sugarcane-Soybean Intercropping System [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1354-1365. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||