Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 1596-1601.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.08.013
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Jiqin1,YANG Shaohai1,HUANG Zhenrui1,*(),LU Yusheng2,GU Wenjie2,LI Shuling1
Received:
2019-10-16
Revised:
2019-12-06
Online:
2020-08-25
Published:
2020-09-17
Contact:
HUANG Zhenrui
CLC Number:
LI Jiqin,YANG Shaohai,HUANG Zhenrui,LU Yusheng,GU Wenjie,LI Shuling. Application of Two Soil Conditioners in Alluvial Sandy Soil of Meizhou Tobacco-growing Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(8): 1596-1601.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.08.013
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg?hm-2) | 产值 Output/(yuan?hm-2) | 上中等烟比例 Ratio of middle and hing quality tobacco/% | 上等烟比例 Ratio of high quality tobacco/% | 均价 Average price /(yuan?kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2501.25c | 55 594.50c | 87.51a | 46.29b | 22.23b |
调理剂Ⅰ | 3262.05a | 87 604.20a | 93.96a | 61.23a | 26.85a |
调理剂Ⅱ | 2702.70b | 68 204.85b | 87.52a | 60.47a | 25.23a |
Tab. 1 Comparison of different soil conditioner on economic characters of flue-cured tobacco
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg?hm-2) | 产值 Output/(yuan?hm-2) | 上中等烟比例 Ratio of middle and hing quality tobacco/% | 上等烟比例 Ratio of high quality tobacco/% | 均价 Average price /(yuan?kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2501.25c | 55 594.50c | 87.51a | 46.29b | 22.23b |
调理剂Ⅰ | 3262.05a | 87 604.20a | 93.96a | 61.23a | 26.85a |
调理剂Ⅱ | 2702.70b | 68 204.85b | 87.52a | 60.47a | 25.23a |
处理 Treatment | 部位 Position | 总糖 Total sugar | 还原糖 Reducing sugar | 烟碱 Nicotine | 总氮 Total N | 氯 Cl | 钾 K | 蛋白质 Protein | 糖碱比 Total sugar/Nicotine | 氮碱比 Total N/Nicotine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | C3F | 30.8a | 24.9a | 3.33a | 1.66a | 0.45a | 3.88a | 6.77a | 9.24b | 0.50a |
调理剂Ⅰ | 34.6a | 26.5a | 2.85a | 1.49a | 0.21b | 3.25a | 6.23a | 12.14a | 0.52a | |
调理剂Ⅱ | 33.9a | 26.2a | 3.01a | 1.53a | 0.18b | 3.52a | 6.32a | 11.27a | 0.51a | |
CK | B2F | 22.1a | 16.0a | 4.90a | 2.41a | 0.41a | 2.66a | 9.81a | 4.51a | 0.49a |
调理剂Ⅰ | 20.2a | 15.5a | 4.82a | 2.18a | 0.45a | 2.18a | 8.41a | 4.19a | 0.45a | |
调理剂Ⅱ | 19.9a | 14.7a | 4.76a | 2.42a | 0.35a | 2.29a | 9.96a | 4.18a | 0.51a |
Tab. 2 Comparison of different soil conditioner on chemical constituents of flue-cured tobacco leaves %
处理 Treatment | 部位 Position | 总糖 Total sugar | 还原糖 Reducing sugar | 烟碱 Nicotine | 总氮 Total N | 氯 Cl | 钾 K | 蛋白质 Protein | 糖碱比 Total sugar/Nicotine | 氮碱比 Total N/Nicotine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | C3F | 30.8a | 24.9a | 3.33a | 1.66a | 0.45a | 3.88a | 6.77a | 9.24b | 0.50a |
调理剂Ⅰ | 34.6a | 26.5a | 2.85a | 1.49a | 0.21b | 3.25a | 6.23a | 12.14a | 0.52a | |
调理剂Ⅱ | 33.9a | 26.2a | 3.01a | 1.53a | 0.18b | 3.52a | 6.32a | 11.27a | 0.51a | |
CK | B2F | 22.1a | 16.0a | 4.90a | 2.41a | 0.41a | 2.66a | 9.81a | 4.51a | 0.49a |
调理剂Ⅰ | 20.2a | 15.5a | 4.82a | 2.18a | 0.45a | 2.18a | 8.41a | 4.19a | 0.45a | |
调理剂Ⅱ | 19.9a | 14.7a | 4.76a | 2.42a | 0.35a | 2.29a | 9.96a | 4.18a | 0.51a |
处理Treatment | 烟草青枯病 Tobacco bacterial wilt | 烟草普通花叶病 Tobacco mosaic virus | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
发病率Morbidity/% | 发病指数Incidence index | 发病率Morbidity/% | 发病指数Incidence index | |
CK | 11.67a | 4.17a | 7.50b | 2.71b |
调理剂Ⅰ | 5.00b | 3.33a | 3.33c | 1.04b |
调理剂Ⅱ | 8.33a | 3.96a | 19.17a | 6.25a |
Tab. 3 Comparison of different soil conditioner on tobacco diseases
处理Treatment | 烟草青枯病 Tobacco bacterial wilt | 烟草普通花叶病 Tobacco mosaic virus | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
发病率Morbidity/% | 发病指数Incidence index | 发病率Morbidity/% | 发病指数Incidence index | |
CK | 11.67a | 4.17a | 7.50b | 2.71b |
调理剂Ⅰ | 5.00b | 3.33a | 3.33c | 1.04b |
调理剂Ⅱ | 8.33a | 3.96a | 19.17a | 6.25a |
处理Treatment | pH | 有机质Organic matter/(g?kg-1) | 碱解氮Hydrolytic nitrogen/ (mg?kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus/ (mg?kg-1) | 速效钾/(mg?kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g?kg-1) | 全磷 Total P/ (g?kg-1) | 全钾 Total K/ (g?kg-1) | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Magnesium [cmol (1/2Mg2+)?kg-1] | 交换性钙 Exchangeable calcium [cmol (1/2Ca2+)?kg-1] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 4.64b | 30.67a | 221.35a | 228.60a | 507.00b | 2.03a | 1.53a | 21.00a | 1.06b | 2.12b |
调理剂Ⅰ | 6.06a | 33.06a | 224.04a | 236.12a | 574.00a | 2.07a | 1.76a | 22.00a | 1.73a | 12.51a |
调理剂Ⅱ | 4.94b | 33.18a | 193.81a | 196.04a | 538.00ab | 2.02a | 1.48a | 21.88a | 1.52a | 3.75b |
Tab. 4 Physical and chemical properties of soil between different conditioning treatments
处理Treatment | pH | 有机质Organic matter/(g?kg-1) | 碱解氮Hydrolytic nitrogen/ (mg?kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus/ (mg?kg-1) | 速效钾/(mg?kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g?kg-1) | 全磷 Total P/ (g?kg-1) | 全钾 Total K/ (g?kg-1) | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Magnesium [cmol (1/2Mg2+)?kg-1] | 交换性钙 Exchangeable calcium [cmol (1/2Ca2+)?kg-1] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 4.64b | 30.67a | 221.35a | 228.60a | 507.00b | 2.03a | 1.53a | 21.00a | 1.06b | 2.12b |
调理剂Ⅰ | 6.06a | 33.06a | 224.04a | 236.12a | 574.00a | 2.07a | 1.76a | 22.00a | 1.73a | 12.51a |
调理剂Ⅱ | 4.94b | 33.18a | 193.81a | 196.04a | 538.00ab | 2.02a | 1.48a | 21.88a | 1.52a | 3.75b |
处理 Treatment | 细菌 Bacteria /(×106CFU?g-1) | 真菌 Fungus /(×105CFU?g-1) | 放线菌 Actinomyces /(×106CFU?g-1) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.09b | 4.89a | 5.69b |
调理剂Ⅰ | 7.17a | 5.04a | 7.90a |
调理剂Ⅱ | 7.42a | 4.88a | 7.92a |
Tab. 5 Soil microbial community between different conditioning treatments
处理 Treatment | 细菌 Bacteria /(×106CFU?g-1) | 真菌 Fungus /(×105CFU?g-1) | 放线菌 Actinomyces /(×106CFU?g-1) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.09b | 4.89a | 5.69b |
调理剂Ⅰ | 7.17a | 5.04a | 7.90a |
调理剂Ⅱ | 7.42a | 4.88a | 7.92a |
处理 Treatment | 转化酶 Invertase/ (mg?g-1) | 磷酸酶 Phosphatase/ [mg?(100 g)-1] | 脲酶 Urease/ [mg?(100 g)-1] | 脱氢酶 Dehydrogenase/ (μg?g-1?h-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 9.04b | 182.79a | 13.56b | 3.87c |
调理剂Ⅰ | 18.48a | 202.46a | 31.06a | 13.75a |
调理剂Ⅱ | 9.59b | 188.30a | 15.59b | 8.25b |
Tab. 6 Soil enzyme activities between different conditioning treatments
处理 Treatment | 转化酶 Invertase/ (mg?g-1) | 磷酸酶 Phosphatase/ [mg?(100 g)-1] | 脲酶 Urease/ [mg?(100 g)-1] | 脱氢酶 Dehydrogenase/ (μg?g-1?h-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 9.04b | 182.79a | 13.56b | 3.87c |
调理剂Ⅰ | 18.48a | 202.46a | 31.06a | 13.75a |
调理剂Ⅱ | 9.59b | 188.30a | 15.59b | 8.25b |
[1] | 罗战勇, 吕永华, 李淑玲, 等. 广东省生态烟区的划分及其烟叶质量评价[J]. 广东农业科学, 2004(1):18-20. |
[2] | 郑武平, 王静, 柴敏, 等. 梅州烟草的土壤适种性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(3):209-214. |
[3] | 刘国顺. 烟草栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003: 16-34. |
[4] | 农恒翘, 宗钊辉, 魏秋兰, 等. 梅州烟区烤烟新品种(系)的筛选[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017,45(3):27-30. |
[5] | 陈桢禄, 刘高, 冯玉龙, 等. 移栽方式对梅州产区烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017,45(24):39-43. |
[6] | 陈壮壮, 郭俊杰, 陈泽鹏, 等. 不同施肥模式对烤烟氮钾肥利用效率及产量和品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2015,30(5):180-188. |
[7] | 孙蓟锋, 王旭. 土壤调理剂的研究和应用进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2013(1):1-7. |
[8] | Pyperas P, Verstraete S, Gong P T, et al. Changes in mineral nitrogen, phosphorus availability and salt-extractable aluminium following the application of green manure residues in two weathered soils of south vietnam[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004,37(1):163-172. |
[9] | 廉晓娟, 路遥, 王艳, 等. 土壤调理剂对日光温室土壤理化性质和蔬菜产量、品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(5):56-60. |
[10] | 张玉树, 王英男, 郑祥洲, 等. 多功能调理剂在福建植烟土壤上的应用效果[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2017,38(4):44-50, 57. |
[11] | 柳开楼, 熊华荣, 胡惠文, 等. 特贝钙土壤调理剂对红壤旱地花生产量和阻控土壤酸化的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017,44(5):93-98. |
[12] | 国家标准化管理委员会. 烤烟: GB. 2635—92[S]. 3版北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003: 403-413. |
[13] | 王瑞新. 烟草化学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003: 170-277. |
[14] | 王志德, 王元英, 牟建民, 等. 烟草种质资源描述规范和数据标准: Yc/T 334-2010[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. |
[15] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 1997: 224-226. |
[16] | 严永升. 土壤肥力研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1988: 243-279. |
[17] | 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1986. |
[18] | 李振高, 骆永明, 滕应. 土壤与环境微生物研究法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 36-52. |
[19] | 蔡海林, 许丽娟, 谢扬军, 等. 烟田土壤调理剂的研究与应用现状[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014,42(19):6212-6213, 6271. |
[20] |
Liu S, Li H, Han C, et al. Cd inhibition and pH improvementvia a nano-submicron mineral-based soil conditioner[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017,24(5):4942-4949.
DOI URL PMID |
[21] | Bai X F, Li Z F, Zhang Y Z, et al. Recovery of ammonium in urine by biochar derived from faecal sludge and its application as soil conditioner[J]. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2018,9(9):1619-1628. |
[22] | 郑祥洲, 郭宝玲, 王英男, 等. 施用新型土壤调理剂改善烟草产量品质及土壤理化性质[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019,40(7):1278-1283. |
[23] | 周杰文, 张发明, 李海平, 等. 不同类型土壤调理剂对保山烟区酸化土壤改良效果研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018,31(2):360-366. |
[24] | 倪志强, 郜斌斌, 石伟琦, 等. 供磷型土壤调理剂在酸性土壤应用效果研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018,39(4):809-815. |
[25] | 邓小华, 杨哲宇, 李玉辉, 等. 施用改良剂对植烟土壤酶活性和养分含量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2019,52(2):33-39. |
[26] | 邢世和, 熊德中, 周碧青, 等. 不同改良剂对烟区土壤肥力性状及烤烟产量和质量的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2004,33(3):384-389. |
[27] | 淡俊豪, 齐绍武, 黎娟, 等. 土壤调理剂对植烟土壤微生物碳代谢指纹的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018,20(10):36-43. |
[28] | 胡亚杰, 孙建生, 石保峰, 等. 土壤调理剂对贺州烤烟质量及植烟土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014,41(21):56-60. |
[29] | 张玉树, 陈哲, 郑祥洲, 等. 多功能土壤调理剂在酸性植烟土壤上应用效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(2):80-86. |
[1] | HUANG Zhenrui,CHEN Diwen,LI Jiqin,LI Shuling. Effects of Combined Application of Seaweed Residue and Magnesium on Physicochemical Properties of Red Soil and Tobacco Growth [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(9): 1797-1802. |
[2] | LUO Bailing,LIU Dunhua,DONG Wenjiang,HU Rongsuo,LONG Yuzhou,CHEN Zhihua,JIANG Kuaile. Effect of Ultrafine Grinding on Physicochemical Properties, Structure and Adsorption Capacity of Coffee Peel [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1219-1226. |
[3] | LIN Changhua,ZHANG Shirong,XIAO Zhou,LIU Chunling,LI Luyao,WANG Jun,DING Xiaodong. The Absorption Dynamic Parameter of NO3 - in Flue-cured Tobacco Pretreated in Different Concentrations of KCl [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(9): 1677-1684. |
[4] | LI Kejie,LUO Bi,TANG Xiaomin,ZHOU Liangyun,YANG Quan,PAN Liming. Changes of Physicochemical Properties and Available Elements in Rhizosphere Soil under Different Intercropping Patterns of Citrus medica L. var. sarcodactylis Swingle [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(9): 1865-1872. |
[5] | ZHENG Xiangzhou,GUO Baoling,WANG Yingnan,ZHANG Yushu,DING Hong. New Type Soil Conditioner Improves Soil Properties and Tobacco Yield and Quality [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(7): 1278-1283. |
[6] | LIU Jingkun,WU Songzhan,CHENG Hanting,LI Guangyi,LI Ye,WANG Jinchuang,LI Qinfen. Advances in Utilization of Spent Mushroom Substrates Plant Growing Medium [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(1): 191-198. |
[7] | LI Jing, CHEN Ruizhou, LAN Zihan, LIN Dian. Effect of Organic Fertilizer Substituting Part of Inorganic Fertilizer on Physical and Chemical Properties, Enzyme Activity and Fruit Nutrient of Garden Soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(4): 656-660. |
[8] | CHEN Xinfan LIN Guowei HONG Tao CHEN Jianzhong SU Shaochuan HONG Wei WU Chengzhen LIN Han. Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Cunninghamia lanceolata - Aleurites Montana Mixed Forestand Cunninghamia lanceolata Pure Forest with Different Age [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(9): 1660-1665. |
[9] | HAO Xiangyang LIANG Tianfeng WEI Shanqing JIANG Ligeng. Effects of Physical and Chemical Properties of Rice Seedling Substrate on Seedling Quality [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(6): 1064-1068. |
[10] | ZHANG Zhenchen, MA Zhuwen, LI Jiqin, YUAN Qinghua, XIE Ruihong, LI Shuling, CHEN Junbiao. Analysis of Combining Ability and Inheritance on Starch Content in Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves#br# [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(2): 240-245. |
[11] | ZHAO Qingyun XING Yizhang SUN Yan LIN Xingjun ZHU Feifei LONG Yuzhou DONG Yunping. Effects of Different Soil Conditioner Application on Coffee Seedlings Growth and Soil Enzyme Activities in Acidic Continuous Cropping [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(10): 1868-1873. |
[12] | WANG Weiwei CHEN Shunhui GAO Wenxia WANG Xinwang ZHANG Binghui. Effects of Different Curing Techniques of Yellowing and Leaf-drying Stage on the Cell Wall [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(5): 1003-1008. |
[13] | SHAN Zhongying LUO Xinglu FAN Wujing MO Fan. Effects of Different Irrigation Amount and Methods on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and the Growth of Cassava [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(3): 493-496. |
[14] | ZONG Yi HUANG Qiaoqiao LI Xiaoxia FAN Zhiwei SHEN Yide. Effects of Aqueous Extracts of Merremia boisiana andMerremia vitifolia on Soil Nutrient Contents and Enzyme Activity [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2015, 36(9): 1620-1625. |
[15] | LIANG Chuanping JIANG Daihua. Soil Properties of Alluvial Fan Soil of Collapsing Gully in Cangwu County [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2015, 36(6): 1086-1091. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||