Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 1450-1458.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.07.023
• Post-harvest Treatment & Quality Safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Jingfan1,2,LIN Zhemin1,LIU Ying1,LIU Ximing3,CHEN Xuemei1,2
Received:
2019-08-05
Revised:
2019-10-15
Online:
2020-07-25
Published:
2020-08-24
CLC Number:
MA Jingfan,LIN Zhemin,LIU Ying,LIU Ximing,CHEN Xuemei. Extraction and Antioxidant Activity of Polyphenols from Gynura formosana Kitam[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1450-1458.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.07.023
编号 No. | X1压力 Pressure /MPa | X2时间 Time/h | X3温度 Temperature/℃ | X4 CO2流量 CO2 flow rate/(L·h-1) | 提取 得率 Yield/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | -1(30) | 1(2.5) | 0(40) | 0(20) | 4.64 |
2 | 1(40) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.65 |
3 | 0(35) | 0(2.0) | 1(45) | 1(25) | 4.69 |
4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.83 |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.31 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.31 |
7 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.71 |
8 | -1 | 0 | -1(35) | 0 | 4.53 |
9 | 0 | -1(1.5) | -1 | 0 | 4.56 |
10 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 4.49 |
11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.50 |
12 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 4.27 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1(15) | 4.36 |
14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.74 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.31 |
16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.65 |
17 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 4.50 |
18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 4.37 |
19 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 4.78 |
20 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 4.24 |
21 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.44 |
22 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 4.49 |
23 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 4.58 |
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.30 |
25 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 4.25 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.29 |
27 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 4.75 |
28 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 4.31 |
29 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 4.34 |
Tab. 1 Design and results of RSM
编号 No. | X1压力 Pressure /MPa | X2时间 Time/h | X3温度 Temperature/℃ | X4 CO2流量 CO2 flow rate/(L·h-1) | 提取 得率 Yield/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | -1(30) | 1(2.5) | 0(40) | 0(20) | 4.64 |
2 | 1(40) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.65 |
3 | 0(35) | 0(2.0) | 1(45) | 1(25) | 4.69 |
4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.83 |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.31 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.31 |
7 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.71 |
8 | -1 | 0 | -1(35) | 0 | 4.53 |
9 | 0 | -1(1.5) | -1 | 0 | 4.56 |
10 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 4.49 |
11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.50 |
12 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 4.27 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1(15) | 4.36 |
14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.74 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.31 |
16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.65 |
17 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 4.50 |
18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 4.37 |
19 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 4.78 |
20 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 4.24 |
21 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.44 |
22 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 4.49 |
23 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 4.58 |
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.30 |
25 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 4.25 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.29 |
27 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 4.75 |
28 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 4.31 |
29 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 4.34 |
来源Source | 平方和SS | 自由度df | 均方MS | F值F value | P值P value | 显著性Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 | 3.23 | 14 | 0.23 | 575.37 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X1 | 0.032 | 1 | 0.032 | 79.82 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X2 | 0.17 | 1 | 0.17 | 434.57 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X3 | 6.557×10-3 | 1 | 6.557×10-3 | 16.33 | 0.0012 | * |
X4 | 0.082 | 1 | 0.082 | 203.12 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X1 X2 | 6.593×10-3 | 1 | 6.593×10-3 | 16.43 | 0.0012 | * |
X1 X3 | 9.209×10-3 | 1 | 9.209×10-3 | 22.94 | 0.0003 | * |
X1 X4 | 8.718×10-3 | 1 | 8.718×10-3 | 2.17 | 0.1627 | |
X2 X3 | 2.180×10-3 | 1 | 2.180×10-3 | 0.54 | 0.4734 | |
X2 X4 | 0.020 | 1 | 0.020 | 49.00 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X3 X4 | 0.031 | 1 | 0.031 | 78.19 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X12 | 0.95 | 1 | 0.95 | 2364.16 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X22 | 0.99 | 1 | 0.99 | 2456.29 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X32 | 0.37 | 1 | 0.37 | 933.87 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X42 | 1.91 | 1 | 1.91 | 4765.41 | < 0.0001 | ** |
残差 | 5.620×10-3 | 14 | 4.014×10-4 | |||
失拟项 | 4.922×10-3 | 10 | 4.922×10-4 | 2.82 | 0.1646 | |
纯误差 | 6.974×10-4 | 4 | 1.744×10-4 | |||
总和 | 3.24 | 28 |
Tab. 2 Variance analysis of response surface
来源Source | 平方和SS | 自由度df | 均方MS | F值F value | P值P value | 显著性Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 | 3.23 | 14 | 0.23 | 575.37 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X1 | 0.032 | 1 | 0.032 | 79.82 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X2 | 0.17 | 1 | 0.17 | 434.57 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X3 | 6.557×10-3 | 1 | 6.557×10-3 | 16.33 | 0.0012 | * |
X4 | 0.082 | 1 | 0.082 | 203.12 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X1 X2 | 6.593×10-3 | 1 | 6.593×10-3 | 16.43 | 0.0012 | * |
X1 X3 | 9.209×10-3 | 1 | 9.209×10-3 | 22.94 | 0.0003 | * |
X1 X4 | 8.718×10-3 | 1 | 8.718×10-3 | 2.17 | 0.1627 | |
X2 X3 | 2.180×10-3 | 1 | 2.180×10-3 | 0.54 | 0.4734 | |
X2 X4 | 0.020 | 1 | 0.020 | 49.00 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X3 X4 | 0.031 | 1 | 0.031 | 78.19 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X12 | 0.95 | 1 | 0.95 | 2364.16 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X22 | 0.99 | 1 | 0.99 | 2456.29 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X32 | 0.37 | 1 | 0.37 | 933.87 | < 0.0001 | ** |
X42 | 1.91 | 1 | 1.91 | 4765.41 | < 0.0001 | ** |
残差 | 5.620×10-3 | 14 | 4.014×10-4 | |||
失拟项 | 4.922×10-3 | 10 | 4.922×10-4 | 2.82 | 0.1646 | |
纯误差 | 6.974×10-4 | 4 | 1.744×10-4 | |||
总和 | 3.24 | 28 |
组别 Group | SOD活性 SOD activity /(U?mg-1) | GSH-Px活性 GSH-Px activity /(U?mg-1) | CAT活性 CAT activity /(U?mg-1) | MDA含量 MDA content /(μmol?g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 207.3±14.11 | 643.7±47.46 | 11.2±1.93 | 7.5±0.68 |
模型组 | 98.5±7.32** | 567.3±52.11* | 8.4±0.48** | 9.2±0.94* |
低剂量组(150 mg/kg) | 134.7±8.47## | 644.0±39.43# | 8.5±0.98 | 7.5±0.57# |
中剂量组(300 mg/kg) | 141.8±5.24## | 657.2±54.23## | 9.7±0.95# | 6.9±0.38## |
高剂量组(600 mg/kg) | 149.8±9.43## | 707.7±62.37## | 11.4±0.97## | 6.2±0.66## |
Tab. 3 Effect of polyphenols from G. formosana Kitam on serum SOD, GSH-Px, CAT and MDA levels
组别 Group | SOD活性 SOD activity /(U?mg-1) | GSH-Px活性 GSH-Px activity /(U?mg-1) | CAT活性 CAT activity /(U?mg-1) | MDA含量 MDA content /(μmol?g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 207.3±14.11 | 643.7±47.46 | 11.2±1.93 | 7.5±0.68 |
模型组 | 98.5±7.32** | 567.3±52.11* | 8.4±0.48** | 9.2±0.94* |
低剂量组(150 mg/kg) | 134.7±8.47## | 644.0±39.43# | 8.5±0.98 | 7.5±0.57# |
中剂量组(300 mg/kg) | 141.8±5.24## | 657.2±54.23## | 9.7±0.95# | 6.9±0.38## |
高剂量组(600 mg/kg) | 149.8±9.43## | 707.7±62.37## | 11.4±0.97## | 6.2±0.66## |
组别 Group | SOD活性 SOD activity /(U·mg-1) | GSH-Px活性 GSH-Px activity /(U·mg-1) | CAT活性 CAT activity /(U·mg-1 ) | MDA含量 MDA content /(μmol·g-1 ) |
---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 58.2±4.33 | 356.9±27.47 | 67.1±4.3 | 1.5±0.11 |
模型组 | 19.2±1.06** | 172.3±10.5** | 39.5±2.16** | 3.2±0.56** |
低剂量组(150 mg/kg) | 28.3±2.41## | 196.8±14.32# | 45.2±2.78# | 2.9±0.29# |
中剂量组(300 mg/kg) | 30.6±2.98## | 239.5±16.93## | 47.1±3.11## | 2.5±0.18# |
高剂量组(600 mg/kg) | 40.7±3.45## | 289.7±19.66## | 49.5±2.49## | 1.9±0.14## |
Tab. 4 Effect of polyphenols from G. formosana Kitam on liver tissue SOD, GSH-Px, CAT and MDA levels
组别 Group | SOD活性 SOD activity /(U·mg-1) | GSH-Px活性 GSH-Px activity /(U·mg-1) | CAT活性 CAT activity /(U·mg-1 ) | MDA含量 MDA content /(μmol·g-1 ) |
---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 58.2±4.33 | 356.9±27.47 | 67.1±4.3 | 1.5±0.11 |
模型组 | 19.2±1.06** | 172.3±10.5** | 39.5±2.16** | 3.2±0.56** |
低剂量组(150 mg/kg) | 28.3±2.41## | 196.8±14.32# | 45.2±2.78# | 2.9±0.29# |
中剂量组(300 mg/kg) | 30.6±2.98## | 239.5±16.93## | 47.1±3.11## | 2.5±0.18# |
高剂量组(600 mg/kg) | 40.7±3.45## | 289.7±19.66## | 49.5±2.49## | 1.9±0.14## |
[1] | 林燕燕, 罗秀针, 曹林枝, 等. 超声下白凤菜总黄酮的优化提取及其体外抑菌活性研究[J]. 右江民族医学院学报, 2017,39(2):90-93. |
[2] | 马景蕃, 刘喜明, 陈晶晶, 等. 白背天葵不同提取部位抗炎活性及机制研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2018,45(2):309-315. |
[3] | 臧涛, 向东. 响应面优化蓝药睡莲总酚水提工艺的研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2017,38(12):2360-2365. |
[4] | 宗建军, 廖传华. 超临界二氧化碳萃取葡萄籽油工艺优化[J]. 化工进展, 2018,37(2):485-491. |
[5] |
Kaur G, Kumar V, Goyal A, et al. Optimization of nutritional beverage developed from radish, sugarcane and herbal extract using response surface methodology[J]. Nutrition and Food Science, 2018,48(10):733-743.
DOI URL |
[6] | 吴朝波, 段瑞军, 王蕾, 等. 对11种热带滨海植物Cd富集能力的初步评价[J]. 海南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,33(3):234-240. |
[7] | Conde T, Mussatto S I. Isolation of polyphenols from spent coffee grounds and silverskin by mild hydrothermal pretreatment[J]. Preparative Biochemistry and Biotech nology , 2016,46(4):406-409. |
[8] |
Goszcz K, Duthie G G, Stewart D, et al. Bioactive polyphenols and cardiovascular disease: chemical antagonists, pharmacological agents or xenobiotics that drive an adaptive response?[J]. British Journal of Pharmacology, 2017,174(11):1209-1225.
DOI URL PMID |
[9] |
Zhou X, Xin Q, Wang Y, et al. Total flavonoids of astragalus plays a cardioprotective role in viral myocarditis[J]. Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2016,32(1):81-88.
URL PMID |
[10] |
Mareček V, Mikyška A, Hampel D, et al. ABTS and DPPH methods as a tool for studying antioxidant capacity of spring barley and malt[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2017,73:40-45.
DOI URL |
[11] | 张杨, 刘闯. 响应面优化超临界法萃取绿豆皮黄酮工艺[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2017,38(22):56-60. |
[12] |
Anguebes F, Abatal M, Bassam A, et al. Esterification optimization of crude African palm olein using response surface methodology and heterogeneous acid catalysis[J]. Energies, 2018,11(1):157.
DOI URL |
[13] |
Bai X L, Yue T L, Yuan Y H, et al. Optimization of microwave‐assisted extraction of polyphenols from apple pomace using response surface methodology and HPLC analysis[J]. Journal of Separation Science, 2010,33(23-24):3751-3758.
DOI URL PMID |
[14] |
Zheng X, Wang X, Lan Y, et al. Application of response surface methodology to optimize microwave-assisted extraction of silymarin from milk thistle seeds[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2009,70(1):34-40.
DOI URL |
[15] |
Huang W, Li Z, Niu H, et al. Optimization of operating parameters for supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of lycopene by response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2008,89(3):298-302.
DOI URL |
[16] |
Zhao F, Li X H. Ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic extraction of silymarin from the Silybum marianum seed shell and evaluation of its antioxidant activity in vitro[J]. EXCLI Journal, 2015,14:861-874.
DOI URL PMID |
[17] |
Liu C H, Wang C H, Xu Z L, et al. Isolation, chemical characterization and antioxidant activities of two polysaccharides from the gel and the skin of Aloe barbadensis Miller irrigated with sea water[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2007,42(6):961-970.
DOI URL |
[18] | 王萍, 赖普辉, 李辉, 等. 响应面法优化陕产枇杷核多酚的提取及体外抗氧化活性研究[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2019,36(7):22-28. |
[19] | 高林晓, 郭蒙, 郭茂鸿, 等. 正交试验设计优化刺三加根中总多酚的提取工艺研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2019,40(13):57-62. |
[20] | 邓俊琳, 李晚谊, 于丽娟, 等. 干燥温度对醇提余甘子多酚含量及其抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019,40(24):57-61. |
[21] | 魏园园, 刘琪, 梁宗瑶, 等. 栓皮栎橡子果仁多酚抗氧化与抑菌活性研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019,40(20):42-48. |
[22] | 杨宽, 钱卫东, 秦蓓. 茶多酚对高脂血症大鼠血脂代谢和肝组织MDA、T-SOD含量的影响[J]. 中国油脂, 2019,44(1):70-73, 96. |
[23] | 王飞霞, 杨晓华, 张华峰, 等. 3种豆芽中异黄酮、多酚的体外抗氧化活性及其对果蝇SOD、GSH-Px活力的影响[J]. 中国食品学报, 2018,18(11):57-64. |
[24] |
Ma J, Guo C, Pan Y, et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of ethyl acetate extract of Gynura formosana (Kitam) leaves[J]. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2017,14(3):2303-2309.
DOI URL PMID |
[1] | ZHU Kexue,DAO Chunli,GU Wenliang,XU Fei,TAN Lehe. Antioxidant Activities and GC-MS Analysis of Ilex kudingcha C.J. Tseng Extracts by Different Extraction Methods [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(3): 579-585. |
[2] | LI Xianmin,LIU Xinliang,LI Chunniu,LU Jiashi,ZHOU Jinye,HUANG Changyan,BU Zhaoyang. Growth and Antioxidant Physiology Effects of Camellia azalea Seedlings under Different Light Conditions [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(4): 688-692. |
[3] | WANG Kelei ZHOU Youhe SHI Jianlei HUANG Zongan ZHU Longjing XU Jian. Effects of LED Light on Plant Growth and the Antioxidant System of Cucumber in a Multilayer Seedling Culturing System [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(5): 854-857. |
[4] | WANG Yong GUO Junjie CHEN Jiahua JI Qinge. The Changes of the Activity of Four Enzymes in Larvae of Bactrocera dorsalis(Hendel)Parasitized by Diachasmimorpha longicaudata [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2013, 34(2): 335-338. |
[5] | WANG Weiying ZOU Hui LIN Bizhen LIN Jiangbo. The Effects of Salicylic Acid on the Antioxidant System of Carved Narcissus [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2012, 33(8): 1431-1434. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||