Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 1347-1353.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.07.009
• Plant Cultivation, Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Zhenrui1,ZHOU Wenling2,AO Junhua2,*(),CHEN Diwen2,HUANG Ying2,JIANG Yong2,LI Qiwei2
Received:
2019-10-31
Revised:
2019-11-20
Online:
2020-07-25
Published:
2020-08-24
Contact:
AO Junhua
CLC Number:
HUANG Zhenrui,ZHOU Wenling,AO Junhua,CHEN Diwen,HUANG Ying,JIANG Yong,LI Qiwei. Sugarcane Yield and Soil Potassium Balance in Potassium Application of Four Consecutive Years[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1347-1353.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.07.009
处理 Treatment | 蔗茎产量 Sugarcane yield/(t·hm-2) | 增产率 Yield increase percentage/% | 农学效应 Agronomy efficiency/(kg·kg-1 K2O) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 平均 Average | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 平均 Average | ||
K0 | 70.43dA | 65.97dB | 63.20eC | 61.57dC | 65.29 | ||||||
K1 | 82.57cAB | 79.93cB | 83.57cA | 80.93bB | 81.75 | 25.20 | 53.93aB | 62.05aB | 90.52aA | 86.05aA | 73.14 |
K2 | 91.30aA | 93.47aA | 92.27aA | 88.60aB | 91.41 | 40.00 | 46.37bB | 61.11aA | 64.59bA | 60.07bA | 58.04 |
K3 | 88.60bAB | 90.57bA | 87.93bB | 86.93aB | 88.51 | 35.56 | 26.91cB | 36.44bA | 36.64cA | 37.58cA | 34.40 |
K4 | 80.87cA | 80.37cA | 79.57dA | 77.67cB | 79.62 | 21.94 | 11.59dB | 16.00cA | 18.19dA | 17.89dA | 15.92 |
Tab. 1 Sugarcane yields and K agronomic efficiency under different K applications from 2014 to 2017
处理 Treatment | 蔗茎产量 Sugarcane yield/(t·hm-2) | 增产率 Yield increase percentage/% | 农学效应 Agronomy efficiency/(kg·kg-1 K2O) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 平均 Average | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 平均 Average | ||
K0 | 70.43dA | 65.97dB | 63.20eC | 61.57dC | 65.29 | ||||||
K1 | 82.57cAB | 79.93cB | 83.57cA | 80.93bB | 81.75 | 25.20 | 53.93aB | 62.05aB | 90.52aA | 86.05aA | 73.14 |
K2 | 91.30aA | 93.47aA | 92.27aA | 88.60aB | 91.41 | 40.00 | 46.37bB | 61.11aA | 64.59bA | 60.07bA | 58.04 |
K3 | 88.60bAB | 90.57bA | 87.93bB | 86.93aB | 88.51 | 35.56 | 26.91cB | 36.44bA | 36.64cA | 37.58cA | 34.40 |
K4 | 80.87cA | 80.37cA | 79.57dA | 77.67cB | 79.62 | 21.94 | 11.59dB | 16.00cA | 18.19dA | 17.89dA | 15.92 |
处理 Treatment | 甘蔗植株吸钾量Potassium uptake/(kg·hm-2) | 钾肥利用率Potassium use efficiency/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 平均Average | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 平均Average | |
K0 | 225.00dA | 176.33dB | 160.00dC | 153.33dC | 178.67 | |||||
K1 | 280.91cA | 240.80cB | 230.14cC | 220.60cD | 243.11 | 24.85aC | 28.65bB | 31.17bA | 29.90bB | 28.64 |
K2 | 323.06bC | 339.90bB | 347.09bA | 338.03bB | 337.02 | 21.79bC | 36.35aB | 41.58aA | 41.04aA | 35.19 |
K3 | 315.78bB | 346.92bA | 371.67aA | 415.44aA | 362.45 | 13.45cD | 25.27cC | 31.36bB | 38.83aA | 27.23 |
K4 | 350.64aD | 367.55aC | 368.30aB | 418.75aA | 376.31 | 13.96cD | 21.25dC | 23.14cB | 29.49bA | 21.96 |
Tab. 2 Potassium contents in sugarcane plant and use efficiency of different K applications from 2014 to 2017
处理 Treatment | 甘蔗植株吸钾量Potassium uptake/(kg·hm-2) | 钾肥利用率Potassium use efficiency/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 平均Average | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 平均Average | |
K0 | 225.00dA | 176.33dB | 160.00dC | 153.33dC | 178.67 | |||||
K1 | 280.91cA | 240.80cB | 230.14cC | 220.60cD | 243.11 | 24.85aC | 28.65bB | 31.17bA | 29.90bB | 28.64 |
K2 | 323.06bC | 339.90bB | 347.09bA | 338.03bB | 337.02 | 21.79bC | 36.35aB | 41.58aA | 41.04aA | 35.19 |
K3 | 315.78bB | 346.92bA | 371.67aA | 415.44aA | 362.45 | 13.45cD | 25.27cC | 31.36bB | 38.83aA | 27.23 |
K4 | 350.64aD | 367.55aC | 368.30aB | 418.75aA | 376.31 | 13.96cD | 21.25dC | 23.14cB | 29.49bA | 21.96 |
处理 Treatment | 速效钾 Available K/(kg·hm-2) | 缓效钾Slowly available K/(kg·hm-2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 2017 | ±增减 | 2014 | 2017 | ±增减 | |
K0 | 101.33dA | 45.67eB | -55.66 | 133.67eA | 93.67eB | -40.00 |
K1 | 126.33cA | 122.67dA | -3.66 | 147.00dA | 135.33dA | -11.67 |
K2 | 147.00bA | 157.67cA | 10.67 | 159.33cB | 188.33cA | 29.00 |
K3 | 152.33bB | 235.67bA | 83.34 | 163.67bB | 222.33bA | 58.66 |
K4 | 169.33aB | 267.67aA | 98.34 | 185.67aB | 229.67aA | 44.00 |
Tab. 3 Soil K contents of 4-year continuous K application
处理 Treatment | 速效钾 Available K/(kg·hm-2) | 缓效钾Slowly available K/(kg·hm-2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 2017 | ±增减 | 2014 | 2017 | ±增减 | |
K0 | 101.33dA | 45.67eB | -55.66 | 133.67eA | 93.67eB | -40.00 |
K1 | 126.33cA | 122.67dA | -3.66 | 147.00dA | 135.33dA | -11.67 |
K2 | 147.00bA | 157.67cA | 10.67 | 159.33cB | 188.33cA | 29.00 |
K3 | 152.33bB | 235.67bA | 83.34 | 163.67bB | 222.33bA | 58.66 |
K4 | 169.33aB | 267.67aA | 98.34 | 185.67aB | 229.67aA | 44.00 |
处理 Treatment | 年均施钾量 Potassium input rate annually/(kg·hm-2·year-1 K2O) | 年均吸钾量 Potassium output rate annually/(kg·hm-2·year-1 K2O) | 4年钾素表观总盈亏 Potassium surplus or deficit rate for 4 years/(kg·hm-2 K2O) | 钾素平衡系数 Index of potassium balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
K0 | 0.00 | 178.67c | -714.68e | 0.00e |
K1 | 225.00 | 243.11b | -72.44d | 0.93d |
K2 | 450.00 | 337.02a | 451.92c | 1.34c |
K3 | 675.00 | 362.45a | 1250.20b | 1.86b |
K4 | 900.00 | 376.31a | 2094.76a | 2.39a |
Tab. 4 Soil potassium balance in 4 years of continuous K fertilizer application
处理 Treatment | 年均施钾量 Potassium input rate annually/(kg·hm-2·year-1 K2O) | 年均吸钾量 Potassium output rate annually/(kg·hm-2·year-1 K2O) | 4年钾素表观总盈亏 Potassium surplus or deficit rate for 4 years/(kg·hm-2 K2O) | 钾素平衡系数 Index of potassium balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
K0 | 0.00 | 178.67c | -714.68e | 0.00e |
K1 | 225.00 | 243.11b | -72.44d | 0.93d |
K2 | 450.00 | 337.02a | 451.92c | 1.34c |
K3 | 675.00 | 362.45a | 1250.20b | 1.86b |
K4 | 900.00 | 376.31a | 2094.76a | 2.39a |
处理 Treatment | 产值 Output/(yuan·hm-2) | 肥料投入 Fertilizer input/(yuan·hm-2) | 增产值 Increase output/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output/input |
---|---|---|---|---|
K0 | 29 381.25 | 3 270.0 | ||
K1 | 36 786.60 | 4 282.5 | 7 405.35 | 7.31 |
K2 | 41 133.75 | 5 295.0 | 11 752.50 | 5.80 |
K3 | 39 828.75 | 6 307.5 | 10 447.50 | 3.44 |
K4 | 35 827.50 | 7 320.0 | 6 446.25 | 1.59 |
Tab. 5 Sugarcane average economic profits in 4 years of continuous K fertilizer application
处理 Treatment | 产值 Output/(yuan·hm-2) | 肥料投入 Fertilizer input/(yuan·hm-2) | 增产值 Increase output/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output/input |
---|---|---|---|---|
K0 | 29 381.25 | 3 270.0 | ||
K1 | 36 786.60 | 4 282.5 | 7 405.35 | 7.31 |
K2 | 41 133.75 | 5 295.0 | 11 752.50 | 5.80 |
K3 | 39 828.75 | 6 307.5 | 10 447.50 | 3.44 |
K4 | 35 827.50 | 7 320.0 | 6 446.25 | 1.59 |
[1] | 吴棉国, 林彦铨, 张华. 我国甘蔗产业标准研究现状与展望[J]. 亚热带农业研究, 2010,6(3):209-212. |
[2] | 肖克, 唐静, 李继福, 等. 长期水稻-冬油菜轮作模式下钾肥的适宜用量[J]. 作物学报, 2017,43(8):1226-1233. |
[3] |
高菊生, 徐明岗, 董春华, 等. 长期稻-稻-绿肥轮作对水稻产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013,39(2):343-349.
DOI URL |
[4] |
唐旭, 陈义, 吴春艳, 等. 大麦长期肥料效率和土壤养分平衡[J]. 作物学报, 2013,39(4):665-672.
DOI URL |
[5] |
Cui Z L, Zhang F S, Chen X P, et al. In-season nitrogen management strategy for winter wheat: maximizing yields, minimizing environmental impact in an over-fertilization context[J]. Field Crops Research, 2010,116(1-2):140-146.
DOI URL |
[6] | 吴良泉, 武良, 崔振岭, 等. 中国玉米区域氮磷钾肥推荐用量及肥料配方研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2015,52(4):802-817. |
[7] |
韦还和, 孟天瑶, 李超, 等. 钾肥用量对甬优籼粳杂交稻物质积累及其产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016,42(8):1201-1214.
DOI URL |
[8] | 王国琼, 李贵荣, 杨宗飞. 甘蔗施用钾肥的效应研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(1):45-46. |
[9] | 谢如林, 谭宏伟, 黄美福, 等. 高产甘蔗的植物营养特征研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2010,23(3):828-831. |
[10] | 谭宏伟, 周柳强, 谢如林, 等. 不同施肥条件下甘蔗对钾的吸收利用研究[J]. 南方农业学报, 2011,42(3):295-298. |
[11] | Huang Z R, Lu Y L, Chen D W, et al. Selection of suitable variety for improving nutrient use and productivity of sugarcane[J]. Rearch on Crops, 2015,16(2):271-280. |
[12] | 黄振瑞, 周文灵, 江永, 等. 优化施肥对甘蔗产量、养分吸收及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015,36(9):1568-1573. |
[13] | 黄振瑞, 陈迪文, 江永, 等. 施用缓释肥对甘蔗干物质积累及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015,36(5):860-864. |
[14] | 林阿典, 黄振瑞, 敖俊华, 等. 施钾和有机肥对甘蔗生长及土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2017(2):20-24. |
[15] | 敖俊华, 周文灵, 陈迪文, 等. 不同用量腐植酸钾对果蔗产量和品质的影响[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2017(2):9-13. |
[16] | 刘子凡, 林电, 彭春燕. 钾肥施用量对甘蔗产质量的影响[J]. 中国糖料, 2009(4):34-35. |
[17] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
[18] |
鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 等. 五年定位试验钾肥用量对双季稻产量和施钾效应的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(3):598-605.
DOI URL |
[19] |
张磊, 张维乐, 鲁剑巍, 等. 秸秆还田条件下不同供钾能力土壤水稻、油菜、小麦钾肥减量研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(19):3745-3756
DOI URL |
[20] | 谢佳贵, 候云鹏, 尹彩侠, 等. 施钾和秸秆还田对春玉米产量、养分吸收及土壤钾素平衡的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(5):1110-1118. |
[21] |
宋光雷, 睢宁, 余超然, 等. 秸秆还田替代化学钾肥对棉麦轮作中棉仁油分累积的效应[J]. 作物学报, 2015,41(10):1548-1556.
DOI URL |
[22] |
肖小平, 汤海涛, 纪雄辉. 稻草还田模式对稻田土壤速效氮、钾含量及晚稻生长的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008,34(8):1464-1469.
DOI URL |
[23] |
刘艳慧, 王双磊, 李金埔, 等. 棉花秸秆还田对土壤速效养分及微生物特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016,42(7):1037-1046.
DOI URL |
[24] | 李奇伟, 卢颖林, 周文灵, 等. 低钾胁迫对甘蔗不同品系生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2011(6):1-5. |
[25] | 郑超, 李奇伟, 黄振瑞, 等. 不同品种甘蔗对钾素吸收差异性的研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2011,32(12):2221-2225. |
[26] | 黄莹, 曾巧英, 敖俊华, 等. 钾水平对甘蔗氮、磷、钾养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013,40(10):50-53, 61. |
[27] | 凌秋平, 曾巧英, 胡斐, 等. 甘蔗CIPK23基因克隆及对低钾、干旱、盐胁迫的响应[J]. 分子植物育种, 2015,13(6):1329-1335. |
[28] | Zeng Q Y, Ling Q P, Fan L N, et al. Transcriptome profiling of sugarcane roots in response to low potassium stress[J]. PLoS One, 2015(5):1-20. |
[29] |
Zheng C, Huang Y X, Li J, et al. The influence of partial substitution of potassium by sodium on the growth effect of sugarcane[J]. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2018, 14(2):168-174.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Kenta W, Tominaga J, Yabuta S, et al. Effects of different kinds of potassium and chloride salts on sugarcane quality and photosynjournal[J]. Sugar Tech, 2017,19(4):378-385.
DOI URL |
[31] |
Gopalasundaram P, Bhaskaran A, Rakkiyappan P. Integrated nutrient management in sugarcane[J]. Sugar Tech, 2012,14(1):3-20.
DOI URL |
[32] | 邢素丽, 刘孟朝, 韩保文. 12年连续施用秸秆和钾肥对土壤钾素含量和分布的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2007,38(3):486-490. |
[33] | 谭德水, 金继运, 黄绍文. 长期施钾对东北春玉米产量和土壤钾素状况的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007,40(10):2234-2240. |
[34] | 黄振瑞. 高产甘蔗养分需求规律及施肥调控研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015. |
[35] |
唐旭, 计小江, 李超英, 等. 水稻-大麦长期轮作体系钾肥效率及土壤钾素平衡[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(1):90-99.
DOI URL |
[36] |
谭德水, 金继运, 黄绍文, 等. 东北地区黑土、草甸土长期施钾对玉米产量及耕层土钾素形态的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(5):850-855.
DOI URL |
[1] | LU Cheng,CHEN Xin,ZHOU Xincheng,XIA Zhiqiang,SUN Yufang,WANG Haiyan,ZOU Meiling,LI Kaimian,LI Zhaogui,XIAO Ziying,ZHOU Bin,HAN Quanhui,ZHANG Peng,WANG Wenquan. Breeding of a New Cassava Cultivar ‘South China No. 16’ [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(9): 1756-1761. |
[2] | LUO Qifeng,ZHANG Xinming,CHEN Lin,XU Pengju,PAN Song,HE Chunxi,CAO Xianwei. Yield and Economic Benefit of Potato in Winter under Different Release Periods of Controlled Slow Release Compound Fertilizers and Ratio of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(8): 1589-1595. |
[3] | LI Jiqin,YANG Shaohai,HUANG Zhenrui,LU Yusheng,GU Wenjie,LI Shuling. Application of Two Soil Conditioners in Alluvial Sandy Soil of Meizhou Tobacco-growing Area [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(8): 1596-1601. |
[4] | XU Xia,GOU Yonggang,LUO Shasha,WANG Yushu,YU Lingling,WANG Jianwu. Effect of Nitrogen Reduction on Yield Stability of Sugarcane-Soybean Intercropping System [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1354-1365. |
[5] | REN Chengcai,WU Chaobo,ZHU Mingjun,HAN Wensu,RUI Kai,LYU Chaojun,ZHANG Yan. Application Effect Evaluation of Solar Energy Self-Controlled Multifunctional Pest Trap Lamp on Areca catechu L. [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1408-1414. |
[6] | ZHAO Mingzhu,GUO Tieying,MA Guanrun,XIAO Ziwei,BAI Xuehui,ZHOU Hua,SU Linlin. Relationship Between Soil Factors, Quality and Yield Formation in Coffea arabica [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1065-1075. |
[7] | LIN Xiaobing,ZHOU Lijun,HUANG Shangshu,ZHONG Yijun,CHENG Yanhong,ZHANG Kun,SUN Yongming,WU Lin. Changes of Agronomic Traits, Yield and Soil Nutrient of Red Soil in Southern China under Different Nitrogen Application Rates [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1076-1083. |
[8] | PENG Chao,AI Wensheng,XIE Yunfan,SHI Yanfei,ZHONG Yi,LI Nan. Effect of Bamboo Sawdust Substrate and Strain Planting Density to Yield and Nutritional Quality of Dictyophora echinovolvata [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1100-1107. |
[9] | WEI Dongping,WEI Jianfeng,LIANG Zhenhua,WEI Qiaoyun,HU Guijuan. Variation among Sugarcane Varieties in Nutrient Uptake and Utilization under Mechanized Production [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 845-850. |
[10] | HUANG Jichuan,PENG Zhiping,TU Yuting,WU Xuena,LIANG Zhixiong,YANG Linxiang,LIN Zhijun. Yield, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Nutrient Effects of Alginate Compound Fertilizer on Double-cropping Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 859-867. |
[11] | YANG Tian,ZHAO Qi,LI Xiaoqin,ZHANG Fengliang,MAO Changli,HU Yonghua,WU Yu. Variations Analysis of Latex Yield and Physiological Traits in Hevea brasiliensis Wickham Germplasm Resources [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 893-900. |
[12] | TIAN Qinglan,LIU Jieyun,WU Yanyan,HUANG Weihua,HUANG Yongcai,MOU Haifei,WU Daidong,ZHANG Yingjun,HUANG Pingming. Comparison of Yield Formation and Quality of ‘Zhongjiao No. 9 ’ under Different Transplanting Dates [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 640-648. |
[13] | CHEN Jiaoyun,KHAN Qaisar,WEI Jianglu,TANG Lihua,DONG Dengfeng,LI Yangrui. Analysis of Physio-biochemical Characteristics of T2 α-tubulin SoTUA Transgenic Sugarcane [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 685-693. |
[14] | XU Zhijun,ZHAO Sheng,HU Xiaowen,KONG Ran,SU Junbo,LIU Yang. Development, Characterization and Speciality of Microsatellite Markers in AP85-441 and R570 Genomic Reference Sequences [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 722-729. |
[15] | NONG Zemei,SHI Guoying,ZENG Quan,YE Xuelian,QIN Huadong,HU Chunjin. Analysis on Enzyme Activity and Microbial Community Diversity in Rhizosphere Soil of Different Sugarcane Varieties [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 819-828. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||