Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1257-1264.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.06.026
• Ecology • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Jinsong,WANG Chao,ZHI Jiazeng,DU Hao,LI Zongkai,GAO Mei,SUN Yinhu,ZHANG Guangyong,CHEN Weiqiang()
Received:
2019-08-02
Revised:
2019-10-12
Online:
2020-06-25
Published:
2020-07-30
Contact:
CHEN Weiqiang
CLC Number:
ZHOU Jinsong,WANG Chao,ZHI Jiazeng,DU Hao,LI Zongkai,GAO Mei,SUN Yinhu,ZHANG Guangyong,CHEN Weiqiang. Yield Change and Carbon Emission Reduction & Fixation Potential of Banana in Mountain Areas in Mode of Chemical Fertilize Reduction[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1257-1264.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.06.026
处理 Treatment | 营养生长期 Vegetative growth period | 分化期 Differentiation stage | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
CK | 172.80 | 90 | 446.40 | 115.20 | 60 | 297.60 |
T1 | 155.52 | 81 | 401.76 | 103.68 | 54 | 253.26 |
T2 | 138.24 | 72 | 357.12 | 92.16 | 48 | 238.08 |
T3 | 120.96 | 63 | 312.48 | 80.64 | 42 | 208.32 |
Tab. 1 Fertilizer application amount g·plant -1
处理 Treatment | 营养生长期 Vegetative growth period | 分化期 Differentiation stage | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
CK | 172.80 | 90 | 446.40 | 115.20 | 60 | 297.60 |
T1 | 155.52 | 81 | 401.76 | 103.68 | 54 | 253.26 |
T2 | 138.24 | 72 | 357.12 | 92.16 | 48 | 238.08 |
T3 | 120.96 | 63 | 312.48 | 80.64 | 42 | 208.32 |
处理 Treatments | 经济产量M果 Economic output /(kg·plant-1) | 总生物量M总 Total biomass /(kg·plant -1) | 经济系数EC Economic coefficient |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 27.042±0.56a | 81.338±1.72a | 33.25±0.89a |
T1 | 26.967±0.54a | 81.450±1.62a | 32.24±0.51b |
T2 | 26.216±0.97a | 80.410±1.78a | 33.21±1.08a |
T3 | 20.524±1.48b | 71.820±1.88b | 30.09±1.34c |
Tab. 2 Economic output and economic coefficient
处理 Treatments | 经济产量M果 Economic output /(kg·plant-1) | 总生物量M总 Total biomass /(kg·plant -1) | 经济系数EC Economic coefficient |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 27.042±0.56a | 81.338±1.72a | 33.25±0.89a |
T1 | 26.967±0.54a | 81.450±1.62a | 32.24±0.51b |
T2 | 26.216±0.97a | 80.410±1.78a | 33.21±1.08a |
T3 | 20.524±1.48b | 71.820±1.88b | 30.09±1.34c |
处理 Treatments | CO2累积排放量 Cumulative CO2 emissions/(g·m-2) | C积累排放量 Cumulative C emissions/(g·m-2) |
---|---|---|
CK | 7237.88±5.64b | 1973.97±4.15b |
T1 | 8154.70±8.81a | 2224.01±9.38a |
T2 | 6926.46±7.42c | 1889.54±8.17c |
T3 | 6679.47±6.90c | 1822.16±7.99c |
Tab. 3 Cumulative CO2 emissions from banana plantation soils treated with different treatments
处理 Treatments | CO2累积排放量 Cumulative CO2 emissions/(g·m-2) | C积累排放量 Cumulative C emissions/(g·m-2) |
---|---|---|
CK | 7237.88±5.64b | 1973.97±4.15b |
T1 | 8154.70±8.81a | 2224.01±9.38a |
T2 | 6926.46±7.42c | 1889.54±8.17c |
T3 | 6679.47±6.90c | 1822.16±7.99c |
处理 Treatments | CO2累积排放量 Cumulative CO2 emissions/g | C积累排放量 Cumulative C emissions/g |
---|---|---|
CK | 3475.89 | 947.97 |
T1 | 3127.97 | 853.08 |
T2 | 2780.42 | 758.30 |
T3 | 2432.86 | 663.51 |
Tab. 4 Cumulative emissions of chemical fertilizer CO2 from different fertilizer treatment
处理 Treatments | CO2累积排放量 Cumulative CO2 emissions/g | C积累排放量 Cumulative C emissions/g |
---|---|---|
CK | 3475.89 | 947.97 |
T1 | 3127.97 | 853.08 |
T2 | 2780.42 | 758.30 |
T3 | 2432.86 | 663.51 |
处理 Teatment | 数学模型 Mathematical model | R2 |
---|---|---|
CK | y=54.212H-71.613 | 0.8953 |
y=11.699H1.8694 | 0.8979 | |
y=12.512e0.6334H | 0.9000 | |
y=152.76ln(H)-77.096 | 0.8932 | |
T1 | y=251.15D-109.81 | 0.9324 |
y=154.16D2.3492 | 0.9353 | |
y=7.8163e3.0773D | 0.9359 | |
y=191.21ln(D)+133.54 | 0.9318 | |
T2 | y=87.982H-166.93 | 0.9860 |
y=3.341H3.0769 | 0.9876 | |
y=3.6896e1.096H | 0.9882 | |
y=246.99ln(H)-174.91 | 0.9853 | |
T3 | y=112.87D-8.5032 | 0.9408 |
y=105.24D1.123 | 0.9398 | |
y=23.25e1.5847D | 0.9379 | |
y=79.986ln(D)+99.042 | 0.9425 |
Tab. 6 Model equation of total biomass of banana plant
处理 Teatment | 数学模型 Mathematical model | R2 |
---|---|---|
CK | y=54.212H-71.613 | 0.8953 |
y=11.699H1.8694 | 0.8979 | |
y=12.512e0.6334H | 0.9000 | |
y=152.76ln(H)-77.096 | 0.8932 | |
T1 | y=251.15D-109.81 | 0.9324 |
y=154.16D2.3492 | 0.9353 | |
y=7.8163e3.0773D | 0.9359 | |
y=191.21ln(D)+133.54 | 0.9318 | |
T2 | y=87.982H-166.93 | 0.9860 |
y=3.341H3.0769 | 0.9876 | |
y=3.6896e1.096H | 0.9882 | |
y=246.99ln(H)-174.91 | 0.9853 | |
T3 | y=112.87D-8.5032 | 0.9408 |
y=105.24D1.123 | 0.9398 | |
y=23.25e1.5847D | 0.9379 | |
y=79.986ln(D)+99.042 | 0.9425 |
处理 Treatment | 株高H Plant height/m | 假茎围D Pseudostem girth/m |
---|---|---|
CK | 2.821±0.031a | 0.754±0.006a |
T1 | 2.811±0.022a | 0.761±0.006a |
T2 | 2.812±0.021a | 0.768±0.008a |
T3 | 2.706±0.942b | 0.710±0.013b |
Tab. 5 Some biological characteristic factors
处理 Treatment | 株高H Plant height/m | 假茎围D Pseudostem girth/m |
---|---|---|
CK | 2.821±0.031a | 0.754±0.006a |
T1 | 2.811±0.022a | 0.761±0.006a |
T2 | 2.812±0.021a | 0.768±0.008a |
T3 | 2.706±0.942b | 0.710±0.013b |
[1] | 李玉萍, 方佳. 中国香蕉产业现状与发展对策研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008(8):443-447. |
[2] | 樊小林, 梁有良, 王孝强, 等. 香蕉营养与施肥[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007: 79-83. |
[3] |
姚丽贤, 周修冲, 彭志平, 等. 巴西蕉的营养特性及钾镁肥配施技术研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005(1):116-121.
DOI URL |
[4] | 杨苞梅, 林电, 李家均, 等. 香蕉营养规律的研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2007(1):117-121. |
[5] | 丁文. 缓控释肥料对香蕉产量、品质和养分利用率的影响[J]. 福建农业学报2013, 28(1):47-50. |
[6] | 朱志堂. 施用控释肥、碱性肥对香蕉生长发育和产量及土壤养分含量的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2017. |
[7] | 曹明, 宋媛媛, 樊小林. 控释氮钾比例对香蕉产量及氮磷钾肥料利用率的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,40(11):35-41. |
[8] | 黄达斌, 林芗华, 林惠环, 等. 不同肥料配比对香蕉的施用效果[J]. 福建果树, 2011(2):1-5. |
[9] | 姚丽贤, 周修冲, 蔡永发. 香蕉适宜氮、钾肥施用比例研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2004(1):35-36. |
[10] | 何应对, 王丽霞, 井涛, 等. 减量施氮对蕉园土壤养分、农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 热带农业科学, 2016,36(12):1-5, 9. |
[11] | 霍敏霞. 氮肥类型对二代蕉园土壤N2O、NO排放及香蕉C、N分配影响研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2012. |
[12] | 董兆佳. 施用不同类型N肥对香蕉生长和氧化亚氮排放影响研究[D]. 海口:海南大学, 2010. |
[13] | 吴川德, 董存明, 傅友强, 等. 生物有机肥对香蕉长势及生物量的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013,40(16):73-75. |
[14] | 陶犁. 云南河口县自然旅游资源形成条件分析[J]. 云南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2002(2):69-73. |
[15] | 唐甫林, 胡石海, 侯秀芳, 等. 水稻株高对经济系数及产量影响的初探[J]. 上海农业科技, 2000(5):9. |
[16] | 李成芳, 曹凑贵, 汪金平, 等. 不同耕作方式下稻田土壤CH4和CO2的排放及碳收支估算[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009,28(12):2482-2488. |
[17] | 刘娇, 袁瑞娜, 赵英, 等. 玉米秸秆及其黑炭添加对黄绵土CO2和N2O排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报: 2014,33(8):1659-1668. |
[18] | 籍春蕾, 丁美, 王彬鑫, 等. 基于生命周期分析方法的化肥与有机肥对比评价[J]. 土壤通报, 2012,43(2):412-417. |
[19] | 佟屏亚, 程延年. 玉米高产栽培经济系数的研究[J]. 北京农业科学, 1996(4):2-4, 21. |
[20] | 张国栋. 大豆品种经济系数与农艺性状相关性的分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 1980(2):60-63. |
[21] | 孟凡乔, 关桂红, 张庆忠, 等. 华北高产农田长期不同耕作方式下土壤呼吸及其季节变化规律[J]. 环境科学学报, 2006(6):992-999. |
[22] | 张亚丽, 张娟, 沈其荣, 等. 秸秆生物有机肥的施用对土壤供氮能力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002(12):1575-1578. |
[23] | 朱兆良, 文启孝. 中国土壤氮素[M]. 南京: 江苏科技出版社, 1992: 228-231. |
[24] | 熊毅, 李庆逵. 中国土壤[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1990: 492-495. |
[25] | 李庆逵, 朱兆良, 于天仁. 中国农业持续发展中的肥料问题[M]. 南昌: 江西科学技术出版社, 1998: 3-5. |
[26] | 徐玉秀. 中国主要作物农田N2O和CH4排放系数及影响因子分析[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2016. |
[27] | 易珍玉, 张玉平, 刘强, 等. 不同有机肥与化肥配施对菜地CO2和CH4排放的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2013(11):42-45. |
[28] | 董玉红, 欧阳竹, 李运生, 等. 肥料施用及环境因子对农田土壤CO2和N2O排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2005(5):83-88. |
[29] | 雷利国. 地膜覆盖对菜地CO2和CH4排放的影响研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2016. |
[30] | 林木森, 王娟, 范志荣, 等. 云南河口山地香蕉测土配方施肥的田间肥料效应研究[J]. 热带农业科学, 2017,37(6):18-22, 30. |
[31] | 陈鸿洁, 王树明. 河口平地蕉园土壤肥力状况分析[J]. 热带农业科技, 2006(4):30-32, 42. |
[32] | 梁成华, 魏丽萍, 罗磊. 土壤固钾与释钾机制研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002(5):679-684. |
[33] | 张会民, 徐明岗, 吕家珑, 等. 长期施钾下中国3种典型农田土壤钾素固定及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007(4):749-756. |
[34] | 张会民, 徐明岗, 吕家珑, 等. 不同生态条件下长期施钾对土壤钾素固定影响的机理[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007(5):1011-1016. |
[35] | 涂书新, 郭智芬, 张平, 等. 植物吸收利用钾素研究的某些进展[J]. 土壤, 2000(5):248-253. |
[36] | 杜君, 秦鱼生. 长期施肥下紫色土壤小麦肥料利用率及增产效益[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,33(5):88-94. |
[37] | 刘学军, 巨晓棠, 张福锁. 减量施氮对冬小麦-夏玉米种植体系中氮利用与平衡的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004(3):458-462. |
[38] |
郭九信, 孔亚丽, 谢凯柳, 等. 养分管理对直播稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016,42(7):1016-1025.
DOI URL |
[39] | 罗明, 文启凯, 陈全家, 等. 不同用量的氮磷化肥对棉田土壤微生物区系及活性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2000(2):66-69, 96-97. |
[1] | WU Xuejin,WANG Mingyue,MA Chen,ZHANG Qun,PANG Chaohai. Simultaneous Determination of 8 Plant Growth Regulator Residues in Banana by Using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Combination with QuEChERS Metho-dology [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(11): 2297-2304. |
[2] | ZHAO Fengliang,ZOU Ganghua,SHAN Ying,DING Zheli,WU Peicong,ZHANG Peng,ZHU Zhiqiang. Current Status of Chemical Fertilizer Application in Banana Plantation, Environmental Risks and Integrated Nutrient Management Practices [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(11): 2346-2352. |
[3] | JIN Zhiqiang. Twenty Years of Genomics Research in Banana (Musa L.): Achievements and Challenges [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(10): 2003-2012. |
[4] | ZHU Xiaoyang,LI Xueping,SHAN Wei,KUANG Jianfei,CHEN Jianye,CHEN Weixin,LU Wangjin. Research Progress of Technologies in Banana Fruit Preservation and Transportation [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(10): 2013-2021. |
[5] | SUN Jian,HE Xuemei,TANG Yayuan,TANG Jie,LI Zhichun. Research Progress of Banana Processing [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(10): 2022-2033. |
[6] | WANG Haibo,DENG Baozhong,WU Rongrong,SHEN Linger,GUO Jiayi,REN Fang. Analysis of Volatile Compounds in Ripening Bananas by Heat Treatment Based on Gas Chromatography-ion Mobility Spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1227-1233. |
[7] | TIAN Qinglan,LIU Jieyun,WU Yanyan,HUANG Weihua,HUANG Yongcai,MOU Haifei,WU Daidong,ZHANG Yingjun,HUANG Pingming. Comparison of Yield Formation and Quality of ‘Zhongjiao No. 9 ’ under Different Transplanting Dates [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 640-648. |
[8] | ZHI Jiazeng,ZHOU Jinsong,DU Hao,LI Zongkai,WANG Chao,GAO Mei,ZHANG Guangyong,CHEN Weiqiang. Ecological Niche of Dominant Weeds in Mountainous Banana Fields of Hekou, Yunnan, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(2): 394-400. |
[9] | LIN Fei,SUN Peiguang,DING Zheli,HE Yingdui,LI Jingyang,WANG Lixia,HUANG Dongmei,TANG Fenling,WANG Bizun. Preliminary Comparing of Agronomic Traits and Yield Between Three Different Banana Disease-resistant Varieties [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(12): 2328-2332. |
[10] | ZHAO Yanjuan,ZHAO Yajuan,LIU Junqi,JIN Tian,CHENG Mao,HUANG Liyu,WANG Zhenzhong,QIN Shiwen. Expression Analysis of Genes Involved in Biosynthesis of Secondary Metabolites for Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense in Response to Three Carbon Sources [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(12): 2440-2446. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||