Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1001-1006.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.05.021
• Crop Pests, Diseases and Their Control, Environmental Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Yang1,CHEN Junyu2,*(),CAI Ducheng1,*(
),FU Yueguan2
Received:
2019-08-20
Revised:
2019-09-14
Online:
2020-05-25
Published:
2020-06-15
Contact:
CHEN Junyu,CAI Ducheng
CLC Number:
ZHOU Yang,CHEN Junyu,CAI Ducheng,FU Yueguan. Functional Response of Neoseiulus barkeri to Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood of Mango[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 1001-1006.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.05.021
蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度 (头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number | 蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌成虫 | 2 | 1.90±0.10a | 1龄若虫 | 2 | 2.00±0.00a |
4 | 3.70±0.21b | 4 | 3.70±0.15b | ||
6 | 4.70±0.15c | 6 | 5.40±0.16c | ||
8 | 4.60±0.31d | 8 | 5.80±0.20c | ||
10 | 5.70±0.26d | 10 | 4.90±0.23d | ||
雄成虫 | 3 | 2.70±0.15a | 2龄若虫 | 2 | 1.70±0.15a |
4 | 2.60±0.27a | 4 | 2.30±0.30a | ||
5 | 3.40±0.27a | 6 | 4.00±0.26b | ||
6 | 3.50±0.31a | 8 | 4.70±0.21bc | ||
7 | 3.50±0.40a | 10 | 5.30±0.37c |
Tab. 1 Daily predation numbers of per female adult of N. barkerion different stages of S. dorsalis Hood
蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度 (头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number | 蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌成虫 | 2 | 1.90±0.10a | 1龄若虫 | 2 | 2.00±0.00a |
4 | 3.70±0.21b | 4 | 3.70±0.15b | ||
6 | 4.70±0.15c | 6 | 5.40±0.16c | ||
8 | 4.60±0.31d | 8 | 5.80±0.20c | ||
10 | 5.70±0.26d | 10 | 4.90±0.23d | ||
雄成虫 | 3 | 2.70±0.15a | 2龄若虫 | 2 | 1.70±0.15a |
4 | 2.60±0.27a | 4 | 2.30±0.30a | ||
5 | 3.40±0.27a | 6 | 4.00±0.26b | ||
6 | 3.50±0.31a | 8 | 4.70±0.21bc | ||
7 | 3.50±0.40a | 10 | 5.30±0.37c |
蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number | 蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌成虫 | 1 | 1.00±0.00a | 1龄若虫 | 2 | 2.00±0.00a |
2 | 1.70±0.15b | 4 | 3.00±0.26b | ||
3 | 2.20±0.20b | 6 | 2.80±0.13b | ||
4 | 3.20±0.29c | 8 | 4.60±0.27c | ||
5 | 3.20±0.20c | 10 | 4.50±0.22c | ||
雄成虫 | 2 | 1.40±0.22a | 2龄若虫 | 2 | 1.60±0.16a |
4 | 1.90±0.31ab | 4 | 2.20±0.25a | ||
6 | 2.80±0.47bc | 6 | 4.10±0.23b | ||
8 | 2.70±0.30bc | 8 | 4.70±0.21bc | ||
10 | 3.00±0.26c | 10 | 5.20±0.25c |
Tab. 2 Daily predation numbers of per male adult of N. barkeriondifferent stages of S. dorsalis Hood
蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number | 蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌成虫 | 1 | 1.00±0.00a | 1龄若虫 | 2 | 2.00±0.00a |
2 | 1.70±0.15b | 4 | 3.00±0.26b | ||
3 | 2.20±0.20b | 6 | 2.80±0.13b | ||
4 | 3.20±0.29c | 8 | 4.60±0.27c | ||
5 | 3.20±0.20c | 10 | 4.50±0.22c | ||
雄成虫 | 2 | 1.40±0.22a | 2龄若虫 | 2 | 1.60±0.16a |
4 | 1.90±0.31ab | 4 | 2.20±0.25a | ||
6 | 2.80±0.47bc | 6 | 4.10±0.23b | ||
8 | 2.70±0.30bc | 8 | 4.70±0.21bc | ||
10 | 3.00±0.26c | 10 | 5.20±0.25c |
蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number | 蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌成虫 | 1 | 0.50±0.17a | 1龄若虫 | 2 | 1.60±0.16a |
2 | 1.00±0.26ab | 4 | 2.60±0.43b | ||
3 | 1.10±0.15b | 6 | 4.10±0.23c | ||
4 | 1.30±0.18b | 8 | 4.40±0.27c | ||
5 | 1.40±0.16b | 10 | 5.20±0.20d | ||
雄成虫 | 1 | 0.80±0.13a | 2龄若虫 | 2 | 2.00±0.00a |
2 | 1.20±0.20ab | 4 | 2.00±0.21a | ||
3 | 1.40±0.22bc | 6 | 2.90±0.35b | ||
4 | 1.60±0.16bc | 8 | 3.20±0.33b | ||
5 | 1.80±0.13c | 10 | 3.50±0.14b |
Tab. 3 Daily predation numbers of per deutonymph of N. barkerion different stages of S. dorsalis Hood
蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number | 蓟马 虫态 Stages of thrips | 蓟马密度(头) Densities of thrips | 日捕食量(头) Daily predation number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌成虫 | 1 | 0.50±0.17a | 1龄若虫 | 2 | 1.60±0.16a |
2 | 1.00±0.26ab | 4 | 2.60±0.43b | ||
3 | 1.10±0.15b | 6 | 4.10±0.23c | ||
4 | 1.30±0.18b | 8 | 4.40±0.27c | ||
5 | 1.40±0.16b | 10 | 5.20±0.20d | ||
雄成虫 | 1 | 0.80±0.13a | 2龄若虫 | 2 | 2.00±0.00a |
2 | 1.20±0.20ab | 4 | 2.00±0.21a | ||
3 | 1.40±0.22bc | 6 | 2.90±0.35b | ||
4 | 1.60±0.16bc | 8 | 3.20±0.33b | ||
5 | 1.80±0.13c | 10 | 3.50±0.14b |
捕食螨虫态Predat-or mite stages | 蓟马虫态 Stages of thrips | 瞬时攻击率Instantaneo-us attack rate | 处理时间Handing time | 最大日捕食量(头)Daily maximum predation number | 捕食效能 Predation capacity/(头·d-1) | 功能反应方程 Functional response equation | R2 | X2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌成螨 | 雌成虫 | 0.8624 | 0.0835 | 11.98 | 10.33 | Na=0.8624N/(1+0.0720N) | 0.9764 | 0.9238 |
雄成虫 | 0.5525 | 0.2034 | 4.92 | 2.72 | Na=0.5525N/(1+0.1124N) | 0.7253 | 5.9757 | |
1龄若虫 | 0.8198 | 0.0792 | 12.63 | 10.35 | Na=0.8198N/(1+0.0649N) | 0.9570 | 2.1569 | |
2龄若虫 | 1.0227 | 0.1014 | 9.86 | 10.09 | Na=1.0227N/(1+0.1037N) | 0.9353 | 0.1607 | |
雄成螨 | 雌成虫 | 0.8743 | 0.1343 | 7.45 | 6.51 | Na=0.8743N/(1+0.1174N) | 0.9913 | 0.5071 |
雄成虫 | 0.9730 | 0.2381 | 4.20 | 4.09 | Na=0.9730N/(1+0.2317N) | 0.9604 | 0.0650 | |
1龄若虫 | 0.6657 | 0.1740 | 5.75 | 3.83 | Na=0.6657N/(1+0.1158N) | 0.8658 | 3.4978 | |
2龄若虫 | 1.1208 | 0.0898 | 11.14 | 12.48 | Na=1.1208N/(1+0.1006N) | 0.9347 | 0.3922 | |
第2若螨 | 雌成虫 | 1.5774 | 0.3582 | 2.79 | 4.40 | Na=1.5774N/(1+0.5650N) | 0.9415 | 1.1038 |
雄成虫 | 0.8445 | 0.4100 | 2.44 | 2.06 | Na=0.8445N/(1+0.3462N) | 0.9963 | 0.1738 | |
1龄若虫 | 1.0922 | 0.0852 | 11.74 | 12.82 | Na=1.0922N/(1+0.0931N) | 0.9896 | 0.2517 | |
2龄若虫 | 0.5364 | 0.2661 | 3.76 | 2.02 | Na=0.5364N/(1+0.1427N) | 0.7023 | 4.1729 |
Tab. 4 Holling-II Functional response parameters of different stages of N. barkerito different stages of S. Dorsalis Hood
捕食螨虫态Predat-or mite stages | 蓟马虫态 Stages of thrips | 瞬时攻击率Instantaneo-us attack rate | 处理时间Handing time | 最大日捕食量(头)Daily maximum predation number | 捕食效能 Predation capacity/(头·d-1) | 功能反应方程 Functional response equation | R2 | X2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
雌成螨 | 雌成虫 | 0.8624 | 0.0835 | 11.98 | 10.33 | Na=0.8624N/(1+0.0720N) | 0.9764 | 0.9238 |
雄成虫 | 0.5525 | 0.2034 | 4.92 | 2.72 | Na=0.5525N/(1+0.1124N) | 0.7253 | 5.9757 | |
1龄若虫 | 0.8198 | 0.0792 | 12.63 | 10.35 | Na=0.8198N/(1+0.0649N) | 0.9570 | 2.1569 | |
2龄若虫 | 1.0227 | 0.1014 | 9.86 | 10.09 | Na=1.0227N/(1+0.1037N) | 0.9353 | 0.1607 | |
雄成螨 | 雌成虫 | 0.8743 | 0.1343 | 7.45 | 6.51 | Na=0.8743N/(1+0.1174N) | 0.9913 | 0.5071 |
雄成虫 | 0.9730 | 0.2381 | 4.20 | 4.09 | Na=0.9730N/(1+0.2317N) | 0.9604 | 0.0650 | |
1龄若虫 | 0.6657 | 0.1740 | 5.75 | 3.83 | Na=0.6657N/(1+0.1158N) | 0.8658 | 3.4978 | |
2龄若虫 | 1.1208 | 0.0898 | 11.14 | 12.48 | Na=1.1208N/(1+0.1006N) | 0.9347 | 0.3922 | |
第2若螨 | 雌成虫 | 1.5774 | 0.3582 | 2.79 | 4.40 | Na=1.5774N/(1+0.5650N) | 0.9415 | 1.1038 |
雄成虫 | 0.8445 | 0.4100 | 2.44 | 2.06 | Na=0.8445N/(1+0.3462N) | 0.9963 | 0.1738 | |
1龄若虫 | 1.0922 | 0.0852 | 11.74 | 12.82 | Na=1.0922N/(1+0.0931N) | 0.9896 | 0.2517 | |
2龄若虫 | 0.5364 | 0.2661 | 3.76 | 2.02 | Na=0.5364N/(1+0.1427N) | 0.7023 | 4.1729 |
[1] | 周成刚, 李健, 乔鲁芹, 等. 茶黄蓟马在银杏上的发生与危害[J]. 山东林业科技, 1994(4):3334. |
[2] | 尼章光. 云南芒果规范化栽培技术[M]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 2009. |
[3] | 劳有德, 韦文添. 芒果蓟马的为害与防治[J]. 广西热带农业, 2003(1):16-17. |
[4] | 陈永森, 黄国弟, 覃婵, 等. 芒果茶黄蓟马(Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood)田间发生动态及监测方法研究[J]. 南方农业学报, 2013,44(10):1646-1652. |
[5] |
Moran M D, Hurd L E. Short-term responses to elevated predator densities: noncompetitive intraguild interactions and behavior[J]. Oecologia, 1994,98(3-4):269-273.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Rosenheim J A, Kaya H K, Ehler L E, et al. Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: theory and evidence[J]. Biological Control, 1995,5(3):303-335.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Hochberg M E. Consequences for host population levels of increasing natural enemy species richness in classical biological control[J]. American Naturalist, 1996,147(2):307-318.
DOI URL |
[8] | Janssen A, Pallini A, Venzon M, et al. Behaviour and indirect interactions in food webs of plant-inhabiting arthropods[M] //Bruin J, van der Geest L P S, Sabelis M W. Ecology and Evolution of the Acari. Dordrecht: Springer, 1999: 231-249. |
[9] | 孟瑞霞, 张青文, 刘小侠. 利用植绥螨防治烟粉虱的研究进展[J]. 昆虫知识, 2007(6):798-803. |
[10] | 吴伟南. 中国动物志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009. |
[11] |
Holling C S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 1959,91(7):385-398.
DOI URL |
[12] | 尚素琴, 郑开福, 张新虎. 巴氏钝绥螨对二斑叶螨的捕食功能反应[J]. 植物保护学报, 2015,42(3):316-320. |
[13] | 黄建华, 罗任华, 秦文婧, 等. 巴氏钝绥螨对芦笋上烟蓟马捕食效能研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2012,28(3):353-359. |
[14] | 王峻枫, 陈军, 李桂亭, 等. 巴氏钝绥螨对腐食酪螨的捕食作用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013,41(15):6694-6696. |
[15] | 李朋新, 夏斌, 舒畅, 等. 巴氏钝绥螨对椭圆食粉螨的捕食效能[J]. 植物保护, 2008(3):65-68. |
[16] | 崔晓宁, 张亚玲, 沈慧敏, 等. 巴氏钝绥螨对截形叶螨的捕食作用[J]. 植物保护学报, 2011,38(6):575-576. |
[17] | 郅军锐, 任顺祥. 胡瓜钝绥螨对西花蓟马的功能反应和数值反应(英文)[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2006(3):35-38. |
[18] | 罗春萍, 户艳霞, 孙军伟, 等. 斯氏钝绥螨对西花蓟马的捕食功能反应[J]. 生物安全学报, 2018,27(4):274-278, 316. |
[19] | 尚素琴, 刘平, 张新虎. 不同温度下巴氏新小绥螨对西花蓟马初孵若虫的捕食功能[J]. 植物保护, 2016,42(3):141-144. |
[20] | 马鹤娟. 加州新小绥螨对西花蓟马的控制作用初探[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2014. |
[21] | 郭建晗, 贾永红, 孟瑞霞, 等. 有益真绥螨对截形叶螨和西花蓟马的捕食功能反应[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2015,43(3):55-58. |
[22] | 黄雅梅. 基于ACT-R认知模型的界面设计要素及其交互方式研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015. |
[23] | 解涵, 解玉浩. 鱼类摄食的经济学[J]. 河北渔业, 2003(6):11-14. |
[24] | 朱新强. 基于能量流动的种群动力学模型[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学(北京), 2010. |
[1] | ZHONG Changkai,XIAO Chunli,ZHANG He,PU Jinji,WU Qiuyu,LIU Yanli,LIU Xiaomei. Sequence Characteristics of Laccase Gene Cglac3 and Its Expression in Two Infection-Related Gene Mutants from Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on Mango [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1202-1207. |
[2] | HAN Dongyin,XING Chuming,LI Lei,CHEN Yongsen,ZHANG Fangping,CHEN Junyu,NIU Liming,FU Yueguan. Investigation and Analysis on the Occurrence and Current Control Status of Mango Diseases and Insect Pests in Guangxi [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 994-1000. |
[3] | LU Xinxi,LUO Cong,ZHANG Xiujuan,YU Haixia,LIU Yuan,HE Xinhua. Cloning, Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis of Mango MiCOL6 Gene [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 715-721. |
[4] | MAI Xinyun,HUANG Jiangqi,HUANG Bin,WANG Yi,LAN Xidan,LIAO Fenyan. Effects of Ultraviolet-C and Cold Treatment on Pestalotiopsis mangiferae and Physiological Indices of Postharvest Mango Fruits [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 764-772. |
[5] | CEN Guanjun,HUA Junda,PAN Yiying,LIU Dahe,SU Beibei,ZHONG Zheng,ZHANG Liankuan,GAO Yan. Online Recognition and Counting with Deep Learning for Mango Images [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(3): 425-432. |
[6] | ZHAN Ligang,YE Huochun,ZHANG Jing,YAN Chao,LI Xiaoyu,FENG Gang. Assessment of Fungicides for in vitro and in vivo Activity Against Xanthomanas campestris pv. mangiferaeindicae [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(3): 538-543. |
[7] | WANG Hong,YANG Chengkun,YUE Kun,GUO Yujian,ZHOU Kaibing. Effects of Mango Trees Fruit Quality and Antioxidant Under Different UV-B Radiation Treatments [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(2): 275-283. |
[8] | KANG Zhuanmiao,HE Fengping,HUANG Hai,LI Xiangyong,LIU Qingguo,ZHANG Yan,GONG Deyong,FAN Jianxin,HUANG Jianfeng,DANG Zhiguo,WANG Yirong,WU Xiaobo,LIU Rong. Analysis on the Quality and Aroma Components of Main Mango Fruits in Guizhou [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(11): 2305-2313. |
[9] | TU Xinghao,MA Huifang,WEI Fang,XIE Ya,LYU Xin,CHEN Hong,DU Liqing. Research Progress on the Physicochemical Properties and Exploitation of Mango Kernel Oil [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(11): 2353-2363. |
[10] | CHEN Yeyuan,DANG Zhiguo,LIN Dian,HU Meijiao,HUANG Jianfeng,ZHU Min,ZHANG He,HAN Dongyin,GAO Aiping,GAO Zhaoyin,HUANG Yuanyuan. Mango Scientific Research in China in the Past 70 Years [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(10): 2034-2044. |
[11] | LIU Bin,WANG Songbiao,LI Xin,SU Muqing,MA Haiyang,WU Hongxia,ZHOU Yigang,MA Xiaowei. Assessment of Soil Fertility in the Mango Orchards of Panzhihua, Sichuan, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(1): 1-6. |
[12] | BAI Beibei,JING Yonglin,LAN Li,WANG Jia,ZHAO Zhichang. Cloning of Mango Gene MinMYB10 and Vector Construction for Expression Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(7): 1297-1303. |
[13] | FU Yao,GAO Zhaoyin,LI Min,GONG Deqiang,CHEN Qianfu,HUANG Huili,YANG Jinying,HONG Xiaoyu,HU Meijiao. Effects of Pre-harvest Application of Compound Sodium Nitrophenolate on Fruit Quality and Incidence of Postharvest Desease of Mango [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(7): 1393-1398. |
[14] | JIN Xiaotuo,MA Jiyong,ZHOU Yanyu,CHEN Lijun,LI Tao,ZHAO Hongwei. Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure Characteristics of Mango Orchard Soil under Reduced Chemical Fertilizer and Increased Organic Fertilizer Application [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(6): 1205-1212. |
[15] | JIN Xiaotuo,ZHOU Yanyu,XIA Yangrongchang,CHEN Lijun,LI Tao,ZHAO Hongwei. Effects of Paclobutrazol on Soil Bacterial Diversity in Mango Orchard and PICRUSt-based Predicted Metagenomic Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(4): 807-814. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||