Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 845-850.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.05.001
• Crop Culture and Nutrition, Genetic Breeding • Next Articles
WEI Dongping1,WEI Jianfeng1,*(),LIANG Zhenhua2,WEI Qiaoyun2,HU Guijuan1
Received:
2019-04-01
Revised:
2019-09-13
Online:
2020-05-25
Published:
2020-06-15
Contact:
WEI Jianfeng
CLC Number:
WEI Dongping,WEI Jianfeng,LIANG Zhenhua,WEI Qiaoyun,HU Guijuan. Variation among Sugarcane Varieties in Nutrient Uptake and Utilization under Mechanized Production[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 845-850.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.05.001
植期 Planting period | 品种 Varieties | 根 Roots/(kg·hm-2) | 茎 Stalk/(kg·hm-2) | 叶 Leaves/(kg·hm-2) | 总量 Total amount/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017年 新植 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 644.75±51.88c | 20 805.98±1 577.65b | 5 147.11±462.20d | 26 597.84±2 358.78b |
‘桂糖29号’ | 809.45±63.21a | 20 796.30±1 675.32b | 5 484.30±453.15c | 27 090.05±2 409.61b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 723.15±52.15b | 22 028.79±1 832.14a | 6 096.32±430.02b | 28 848.26±2 588.26a | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 804.20±65.38a | 22 848.45±1 756.61a | 6 524.75±504.18a | 30 177.40±2 617.47a | |
2018年 宿根 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 913.85±70.25c | 25 020.92±2 037.87c | 6 216.64±540.15b | 32 151.41±2 725.11c |
‘桂糖29号’ | 1 121.71±88.32a | 26 755.46±2 351.67b | 7 330.41±483.81a | 35 207.58±3 320.70b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 1 030.00±76.55b | 28 030.20±2 562.03ab | 7 349.04±506.75a | 36 409.24±3 340.29ab | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 1 147.29±92.52a | 29 294.61±2 506.50a | 7 572.89±556.14a | 38 014.79±3 501.84a |
Tab. 1 Dry matter accumulation of different sugarcane varieties
植期 Planting period | 品种 Varieties | 根 Roots/(kg·hm-2) | 茎 Stalk/(kg·hm-2) | 叶 Leaves/(kg·hm-2) | 总量 Total amount/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017年 新植 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 644.75±51.88c | 20 805.98±1 577.65b | 5 147.11±462.20d | 26 597.84±2 358.78b |
‘桂糖29号’ | 809.45±63.21a | 20 796.30±1 675.32b | 5 484.30±453.15c | 27 090.05±2 409.61b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 723.15±52.15b | 22 028.79±1 832.14a | 6 096.32±430.02b | 28 848.26±2 588.26a | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 804.20±65.38a | 22 848.45±1 756.61a | 6 524.75±504.18a | 30 177.40±2 617.47a | |
2018年 宿根 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 913.85±70.25c | 25 020.92±2 037.87c | 6 216.64±540.15b | 32 151.41±2 725.11c |
‘桂糖29号’ | 1 121.71±88.32a | 26 755.46±2 351.67b | 7 330.41±483.81a | 35 207.58±3 320.70b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 1 030.00±76.55b | 28 030.20±2 562.03ab | 7 349.04±506.75a | 36 409.24±3 340.29ab | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 1 147.29±92.52a | 29 294.61±2 506.50a | 7 572.89±556.14a | 38 014.79±3 501.84a |
植期 Planting period | 品种 Varieties | N | P2O5 | K2O | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根 Roots/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎 Stalk/ (kg·hm-2) | 叶Leaves/ (kg·hm-2) | 总量 Total amount/ (kg·hm-2) | 根 Roots/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎 Stalk/ (kg·hm-2) | 叶Leaves/ (kg·hm-2) | 总量 Total amount/ (kg·hm-2) | 根 Roots/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎 Stalk/ (kg·hm-2) | 叶Leaves/ (kg·hm-2) | 总量Total amount/ (kg·hm-2) | ||
2017年 新植 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 3.31± 0.31c | 98.62± 8.52c | 31.86± 2.52b | 133.79±13.38c | 0.86± 0.07c | 27.46± 2.51b | 7.67± 0.51c | 35.99± 3.05c | 3.76± 0.26c | 179.74±14.65c | 49.81± 3.80c | 233.31±18.42c |
‘桂糖29号’ | 4.40± 0.40a | 123.95±10.78a | 35.04± 2.31a | 163.39±15.34a | 1.17± 0.06a | 28.28± 1.86b | 8.99± 0.69b | 38.44± 3.54b | 4.10± 0.35b | 202.79±15.18b | 55.11± 3.65b | 262.00±20.93b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 3.67± 0.33b | 110.36± 10.41b | 32.01± 2.76b | 146.04± 11.44b | 1.08± 0.08b | 31.50± 1.73a | 9.51a± 0.65b | 42.09± 2.95a | 4.28± 0.31b | 202.01±16.77b | 61.57± 50.3a | 267.86±25.23b | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 4.48± 0.45a | 124.75±8.65a | 31.58± 2.82b | 160.81±15.07a | 1.13± 0.08ab | 30.62± 2.48a | 9.92± 0.74a | 41.67± 3.27a | 4.85± 0.34a | 218.62±15.03a | 63.52± 5.45a | 286.99±20.93a | |
2018年 宿根 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 3.61± 0.25c | 106.84±10.25c | 35.87± 2.96b | 146.32±14.63c | 1.13± 0.10c | 29.77± 1.85c | 8.95± 0.72c | 39.85± 3.44c | 5.00± 0.43b | 202.24±17.63b | 46.48± 4.11c | 253.72±21.90c |
‘桂糖29号’ | 4.88± 0.32b | 147.96±12.06a | 43.98± 2.90a | 196.82±16.68a | 1.38± 0.09b | 32.64± 2.04b | 10.19± 0.69b | 44.21± 4.02b | 4.86± 0.40b | 240.46±17.45a | 66.25± 4.73a | 311.57± 23.81a | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 4.71± 0.41b | 134.26±10.75b | 34.32± 3.22b | 173.29±17.01b | 1.38± 0.08b | 33.36± 1.83ab | 11.39± 0.87a | 46.13± 3.33ab | 5.79± 0.38a | 233.31±13.72a | 58.98± 5.13b | 298.08±21.52b | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 5.58± 0.47a | 145.89±13.57a | 34.15± 2.76b | 185.62±16.99a | 1.46± 0.11a | 35.15± 2.33a | 10.68± 0.99b | 47.29± 4.21a | 5.11± 0.46b | 244.81±19.19a | 59.20± 4.18b | 309.12±26.76ab |
Tab. 2 N, P2O5 and K2O accumulation of different sugarcane varieties
植期 Planting period | 品种 Varieties | N | P2O5 | K2O | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根 Roots/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎 Stalk/ (kg·hm-2) | 叶Leaves/ (kg·hm-2) | 总量 Total amount/ (kg·hm-2) | 根 Roots/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎 Stalk/ (kg·hm-2) | 叶Leaves/ (kg·hm-2) | 总量 Total amount/ (kg·hm-2) | 根 Roots/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎 Stalk/ (kg·hm-2) | 叶Leaves/ (kg·hm-2) | 总量Total amount/ (kg·hm-2) | ||
2017年 新植 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 3.31± 0.31c | 98.62± 8.52c | 31.86± 2.52b | 133.79±13.38c | 0.86± 0.07c | 27.46± 2.51b | 7.67± 0.51c | 35.99± 3.05c | 3.76± 0.26c | 179.74±14.65c | 49.81± 3.80c | 233.31±18.42c |
‘桂糖29号’ | 4.40± 0.40a | 123.95±10.78a | 35.04± 2.31a | 163.39±15.34a | 1.17± 0.06a | 28.28± 1.86b | 8.99± 0.69b | 38.44± 3.54b | 4.10± 0.35b | 202.79±15.18b | 55.11± 3.65b | 262.00±20.93b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 3.67± 0.33b | 110.36± 10.41b | 32.01± 2.76b | 146.04± 11.44b | 1.08± 0.08b | 31.50± 1.73a | 9.51a± 0.65b | 42.09± 2.95a | 4.28± 0.31b | 202.01±16.77b | 61.57± 50.3a | 267.86±25.23b | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 4.48± 0.45a | 124.75±8.65a | 31.58± 2.82b | 160.81±15.07a | 1.13± 0.08ab | 30.62± 2.48a | 9.92± 0.74a | 41.67± 3.27a | 4.85± 0.34a | 218.62±15.03a | 63.52± 5.45a | 286.99±20.93a | |
2018年 宿根 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 3.61± 0.25c | 106.84±10.25c | 35.87± 2.96b | 146.32±14.63c | 1.13± 0.10c | 29.77± 1.85c | 8.95± 0.72c | 39.85± 3.44c | 5.00± 0.43b | 202.24±17.63b | 46.48± 4.11c | 253.72±21.90c |
‘桂糖29号’ | 4.88± 0.32b | 147.96±12.06a | 43.98± 2.90a | 196.82±16.68a | 1.38± 0.09b | 32.64± 2.04b | 10.19± 0.69b | 44.21± 4.02b | 4.86± 0.40b | 240.46±17.45a | 66.25± 4.73a | 311.57± 23.81a | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 4.71± 0.41b | 134.26±10.75b | 34.32± 3.22b | 173.29±17.01b | 1.38± 0.08b | 33.36± 1.83ab | 11.39± 0.87a | 46.13± 3.33ab | 5.79± 0.38a | 233.31±13.72a | 58.98± 5.13b | 298.08±21.52b | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 5.58± 0.47a | 145.89±13.57a | 34.15± 2.76b | 185.62±16.99a | 1.46± 0.11a | 35.15± 2.33a | 10.68± 0.99b | 47.29± 4.21a | 5.11± 0.46b | 244.81±19.19a | 59.20± 4.18b | 309.12±26.76ab |
植期Planting period | 品种Varieties | N/kg | P2O5/kg | K2O/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017年新植 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 1.69±0.14c | 0.45±0.04b | 2.94±0.19b |
‘桂糖29号’ | 1.99±0.18a | 0.47±0.03ab | 3.19±0.24a | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 1.67±0.15c | 0.48±0.05a | 3.07±0.28ab | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 1.80±0.16b | 0.47±0.04ab | 3.21±0.26a | |
2018年宿根 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 1.57±0.12c | 0.43±0.03b | 2.72±0.22c |
‘桂糖29号’ | 2.03±0.17a | 0.46±0.03a | 3.21±0.26a | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 1.71±0.14b | 0.46±0.04a | 2.94±0.23b | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 1.77±0.15b | 0.45±0.04ab | 2.95±0.27b |
Tab. 3 N, P2O5 and K2O requirement per ton sugarcane stalk of different sugarcane varieties
植期Planting period | 品种Varieties | N/kg | P2O5/kg | K2O/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017年新植 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 1.69±0.14c | 0.45±0.04b | 2.94±0.19b |
‘桂糖29号’ | 1.99±0.18a | 0.47±0.03ab | 3.19±0.24a | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 1.67±0.15c | 0.48±0.05a | 3.07±0.28ab | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 1.80±0.16b | 0.47±0.04ab | 3.21±0.26a | |
2018年宿根 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 1.57±0.12c | 0.43±0.03b | 2.72±0.22c |
‘桂糖29号’ | 2.03±0.17a | 0.46±0.03a | 3.21±0.26a | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 1.71±0.14b | 0.46±0.04a | 2.94±0.23b | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 1.77±0.15b | 0.45±0.04ab | 2.95±0.27b |
植期 Planting period | 品种 Varieties | 经济效率Economic efficiency/(kg·kg-1) | 生理效率Physiological efficiency/(kg·kg-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
2017年 新植 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 155.51±13.22a | 578.10±45.81a | 89.18±7.81a | 198.80±16.21a | 739.03±50.65a | 114.00±8.70a |
‘桂糖29号’ | 127.28±9.26c | 541.01±50.04b | 79.38±5.56b | 165.90±10.98c | 705.18±60.78bc | 103.46±7.87b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 150.84±11.82a | 523.37±30.79b | 82.24±6.02b | 197.54±14.10a | 685.39±55.37c | 107.70±8.48b | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 142.08±9.04b | 548.32±48.09b | 79.61±7.21b | 187.56±14.94b | 723.80±58.81ab | 105.09±8.82b | |
2018年 宿根 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 171.00±11.01a | 627.88±50.65a | 98.62±6.96a | 219.73±16.88a | 806.81±66.37a | 126.72±9.90a |
‘桂糖29号’ | 135.94±11.55c | 605.19±47.79a | 85.87±7.46b | 178.88±16.20c | 796.37±65.80a | 113.00±8.64b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 161.75±14.07b | 607.63±46.29a | 94.04±7.77a | 210.11±18.88ab | 789.27±53.41a | 122.15±10.11a | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 157.82±12.22b | 619.47±55.07a | 94.77±7.58a | 204.80±16.46b | 803.87±68.21a | 122.98±9.58a |
Tab. 4 N, P2O5 and K2O efficiency of different sugarcane varieties
植期 Planting period | 品种 Varieties | 经济效率Economic efficiency/(kg·kg-1) | 生理效率Physiological efficiency/(kg·kg-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
2017年 新植 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 155.51±13.22a | 578.10±45.81a | 89.18±7.81a | 198.80±16.21a | 739.03±50.65a | 114.00±8.70a |
‘桂糖29号’ | 127.28±9.26c | 541.01±50.04b | 79.38±5.56b | 165.90±10.98c | 705.18±60.78bc | 103.46±7.87b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 150.84±11.82a | 523.37±30.79b | 82.24±6.02b | 197.54±14.10a | 685.39±55.37c | 107.70±8.48b | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 142.08±9.04b | 548.32±48.09b | 79.61±7.21b | 187.56±14.94b | 723.80±58.81ab | 105.09±8.82b | |
2018年 宿根 | ‘桂柳05136’ | 171.00±11.01a | 627.88±50.65a | 98.62±6.96a | 219.73±16.88a | 806.81±66.37a | 126.72±9.90a |
‘桂糖29号’ | 135.94±11.55c | 605.19±47.79a | 85.87±7.46b | 178.88±16.20c | 796.37±65.80a | 113.00±8.64b | |
‘桂糖31号’ | 161.75±14.07b | 607.63±46.29a | 94.04±7.77a | 210.11±18.88ab | 789.27±53.41a | 122.15±10.11a | |
‘桂糖42号’ | 157.82±12.22b | 619.47±55.07a | 94.77±7.58a | 204.80±16.46b | 803.87±68.21a | 122.98±9.58a |
[1] | 谭秦亮, 朱鹏锦, 程琴, 等. 不同甘蔗品种(系)的产量构成因素及品质比较[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(3):49-54. |
[2] | 谭裕模, 邢颖, 蒙炎成, 等. 广西甘蔗全程机械化相适应种植行距及模式[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018,31(3):471-477. |
[3] | Tan J J, Yang S D. Mechanization development of sugarcane production in Guangxi[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2018,49(4):806-811. |
[4] | 王继华, 商贺阳, 杨少海. 我国甘蔗养分高效利用的研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2018,40(6):66-68, 72. |
[5] | 魏丽娜, 陈迪文, 周文灵, 等. 不同基因型甘蔗地上部氮磷钾养分特征分析[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2015(4):10-15. |
[6] | 邢颖, 江泽普, 谭裕模, 等. 不同基因型甘蔗氮磷钾积累与利用研究[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2013(1):10-13. |
[7] | 李进, 段婷婷, 邓凯, 等. 不同品种甘蔗生长对氮肥的响应与利用[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019,40(4):649-656. |
[8] | 黄振瑞, 周文灵, 江永, 等. 优化施肥对甘蔗产量、养分吸收及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015,36(9):1568-1573. |
[9] | 郭家文, 张跃彬, 崔雄维, 等. 氮磷钾在甘蔗体内的积累及对产量品质的影响[J]. 土壤, 2012,44(6):977-981. |
[10] | 谢如林, 谭宏伟, 黄美福, 等. 高产甘蔗的植物营养特征研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2010,23(3):828-831. |
[11] | 覃伟, 吴才文, 赵俊, 等. 甘蔗宿根性研究I.甘蔗宿根蔗蔸形态特征与其宿根性的关系[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017,30(5):989-993. |
[12] | 中华人民共和国农业部植物中氮、磷、钾的测定: NY/T 2017-2011 [S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011. |
[13] | 甘崇琨, 陈荣发, 范业赓, 等. 桂糖系列甘蔗新品种(系)比较试验[J]. 中国糖料, 2018,40(1):30-32. |
[14] | 张华, 苏俊波, 林兆里, 等. 机械化模式下不同追肥量对甘蔗品种产量的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2012,33(8):1354-1358. |
[15] | 黄振瑞. 高产甘蔗养分需求规律及施肥调控研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015. |
[16] | 程小燕. 两个甘蔗品种对氮、磷、钾的吸收与累积特征[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2013. |
[17] | 恽绵, 朱秋珍, 苏群忠. 广西旱地甘蔗养分吸收参数研究——第1报甘蔗N素养分吸收参数的研究[J]. 广西蔗糖, 1996(1):13-16. |
[18] | 恽绵, 朱秋珍, 苏群忠. 广西旱地甘蔗养分吸收参数研究——第2报甘蔗磷素养分吸收参数[J]. 广西蔗糖, 1997 ( 4):11-13. |
[19] | 恽绵, 朱秋珍, 苏群忠. 广西旱地甘蔗养分吸收参数研究第3报甘蔗钾素养分吸收参数[J]. 广西蔗糖, 1998(1):3-6. |
[20] | 周修冲, 刘国坚, Sam Portch, 等. 高产甘蔗营养特性及钾、硫、镁肥效应研究[J]. 土壤肥料, 1998(3):26-28, 32. |
[1] | LI Zhaoying,ZHENG Lu,YANG Wenjuan. Comparison of Three Methods for Determination of Soil Exchangeable Aluminium [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(9): 1912-1917. |
[2] | WEI Yundong,LUO Yanchun,ZHENG Hua,LI Jun,PAN Huan,LEI Kaiwen,XU Chuan. Cassava Rhizosphere Soil Collected by “Root Bag” Method and Its Bacteria Diversity [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(9): 1928-1938. |
[3] | HUANG Zhenrui,ZHOU Wenling,AO Junhua,CHEN Diwen,HUANG Ying,JIANG Yong,LI Qiwei. Sugarcane Yield and Soil Potassium Balance in Potassium Application of Four Consecutive Years [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1347-1353. |
[4] | XU Xia,GOU Yonggang,LUO Shasha,WANG Yushu,YU Lingling,WANG Jianwu. Effect of Nitrogen Reduction on Yield Stability of Sugarcane-Soybean Intercropping System [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1354-1365. |
[5] | LIN Xiaobing,ZHOU Lijun,HUANG Shangshu,ZHONG Yijun,CHENG Yanhong,ZHANG Kun,SUN Yongming,WU Lin. Changes of Agronomic Traits, Yield and Soil Nutrient of Red Soil in Southern China under Different Nitrogen Application Rates [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1076-1083. |
[6] | HUANG Jichuan,PENG Zhiping,TU Yuting,WU Xuena,LIANG Zhixiong,YANG Linxiang,LIN Zhijun. Yield, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Nutrient Effects of Alginate Compound Fertilizer on Double-cropping Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 859-867. |
[7] | WEN Yifu,HAN Rongrong,SHAN Guilian,SHI Liangtao,LUO Fucheng,ZHAO Xiaoxue,ZENG Liqiong. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes in Low Phosphorus Stress of Stylosanthes Guianensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 971-977. |
[8] | CHEN Jiaoyun,KHAN Qaisar,WEI Jianglu,TANG Lihua,DONG Dengfeng,LI Yangrui. Analysis of Physio-biochemical Characteristics of T2 α-tubulin SoTUA Transgenic Sugarcane [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 685-693. |
[9] | PAN Taowen,CHEN Yu,CAI Kunzheng. Silicon and Nitrogen Improving the Eco-physiological Characteristics of High Quality Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 694-700. |
[10] | XU Zhijun,ZHAO Sheng,HU Xiaowen,KONG Ran,SU Junbo,LIU Yang. Development, Characterization and Speciality of Microsatellite Markers in AP85-441 and R570 Genomic Reference Sequences [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 722-729. |
[11] | NONG Zemei,SHI Guoying,ZENG Quan,YE Xuelian,QIN Huadong,HU Chunjin. Analysis on Enzyme Activity and Microbial Community Diversity in Rhizosphere Soil of Different Sugarcane Varieties [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 819-828. |
[12] | DONG Yunping,YAN Lin,HUANG Lifang,LIN Xingjun,SUN Yan,WANG Xiaoyang,LONG Yuzhou. Analysis of Nitrogen Uptake of 20 Coffea arabica L. Accesions [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(3): 417-424. |
[13] | CHEN Shu,ZHAO Qiufang,CHEN Hongliang,JIN Hui. Bioinformatics Analysis of Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzymes and Expression Analysis of UBC2 Gene Sub-family in Response to LowNitrogen Stress in Maize [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(2): 305-314. |
[14] | JING Yan,ZHOU Hui,LIU Xihui,TAN Fang,ZHANG Xiaoqiu,ZHANG Ronghua,SONG Xiupeng,LI Yangrui,YAN Meixin,LEI Jingchao,QIN Zhenqiang,LUO Yawei,LI Dongmei,WEI Jinju. Smut Resistant Identification and Analysis of New Sugarcane Clones of Guitang [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(2): 333-338. |
[15] | GUO Ying,LIN Zhikai,WANG Wenhua,LIU Liqing,HE Enming. Accumulation of Lxx in Infected Sugarcane Stem and Its Effect on Structure of Sugarcane Stem [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(2): 359-364. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||