Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 474-481.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.03.008
• Phytophysiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
QIU Jian,XIAO Xianzhou,GAO Honghua,YANG Wenfeng,WEI Fang,WU Ming,LUO Shiqiao()
Received:
2019-07-18
Revised:
2019-08-27
Online:
2020-03-25
Published:
2020-04-16
Contact:
LUO Shiqiao
CLC Number:
QIU Jian,XIAO Xianzhou,GAO Honghua,YANG Wenfeng,WEI Fang,WU Ming,LUO Shiqiao. Stimulation Technology and Adaptability of d6 Tapping System for Mid-aged Hevea Clone PR107 and Reyan 7-33-97[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(3): 474-481.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.03.008
橡胶树PR107 Hevea clone PR107 | 橡胶树热研7-33-97 Hevea clone Reyan7-33-97 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
编号 No. | 割胶符号 Notations of tapping system | 处理 Treatments | 编号No. | 割胶符号 Notations of tapping system | 处理 Treatments |
CK1 | S/2 d4 2.5% ET 12 d | 4天1刀,每3刀涂施2.5%乙烯利 | CK2 | S/2 d4 1.5% ET 12 d | 4天1刀,每3刀涂施1.5%乙烯利 |
P1 | S/2 d6 2.5% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施2.5%乙烯利 | R1 | S/2 d6 1.5% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施1.5%乙烯利 |
P2 | S/2 d6 3% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施3%乙烯利 | R2 | S/2 d6 2% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施2%乙烯利 |
P3 | S/2 d6 3.5% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施3.5%乙烯利 | R3 | S/2 d6 2.5% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施2.5%乙烯利 |
P4 | S/2 d6 4% ET 6 d | 6天1刀,每1刀涂施4%乙烯利 | R4 | S/2 d6 3% ET 6 d | 6天1刀,每1刀涂施3%乙烯利 |
P5 | S/2 d6 4% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施4%乙烯利 | R5 | S/2 d6 3% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施3%乙烯利 |
P6 | S/2 d6 4% ET 18 d | 6天1刀,每3刀涂施4%乙烯利 | R6 | S/2 d6 3% ET 18 d | 6天1刀,每3刀涂施3%乙烯利 |
Tab. 1 Number of tapping and stimulation of each treatment
橡胶树PR107 Hevea clone PR107 | 橡胶树热研7-33-97 Hevea clone Reyan7-33-97 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
编号 No. | 割胶符号 Notations of tapping system | 处理 Treatments | 编号No. | 割胶符号 Notations of tapping system | 处理 Treatments |
CK1 | S/2 d4 2.5% ET 12 d | 4天1刀,每3刀涂施2.5%乙烯利 | CK2 | S/2 d4 1.5% ET 12 d | 4天1刀,每3刀涂施1.5%乙烯利 |
P1 | S/2 d6 2.5% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施2.5%乙烯利 | R1 | S/2 d6 1.5% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施1.5%乙烯利 |
P2 | S/2 d6 3% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施3%乙烯利 | R2 | S/2 d6 2% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施2%乙烯利 |
P3 | S/2 d6 3.5% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施3.5%乙烯利 | R3 | S/2 d6 2.5% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施2.5%乙烯利 |
P4 | S/2 d6 4% ET 6 d | 6天1刀,每1刀涂施4%乙烯利 | R4 | S/2 d6 3% ET 6 d | 6天1刀,每1刀涂施3%乙烯利 |
P5 | S/2 d6 4% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施4%乙烯利 | R5 | S/2 d6 3% ET 12 d | 6天1刀,每2刀涂施3%乙烯利 |
P6 | S/2 d6 4% ET 18 d | 6天1刀,每3刀涂施4%乙烯利 | R6 | S/2 d6 3% ET 18 d | 6天1刀,每3刀涂施3%乙烯利 |
品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 试后刀数 Tapping number after treatment | 涂药次数 Number of ethrel application | 试前单株产量 Yield per tree before treatment/ kg | 试后单株产量 Yield per tree after treatment/ kg | 全年单株产量 Annual yield per tree/kg | 刀次产 Annual yield per tree per tapping/kg | 累计DRC Cumulation DRC/% | 净增产率 Increase rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
橡胶树PR107 | CK1 | 45 | 13 | 0.141a | 2.807a | 2.948 | 0.062b | 29.2c | |
P1 | 30 | 13 | 0.137a | 1.853c | 1.990 | 0.062b | 38.6a | -32.1 | |
P2 | 30 | 13 | 0.140a | 2.026bc | 2.166 | 0.068b | 37.1a | -27.3 | |
P3 | 30 | 13 | 0.140a | 2.202ab | 2.343 | 0.073a | 36.5ab | -21.0 | |
P4 | 30 | 26 | 0.141a | 2.085bc | 2.226 | 0.069ab | 35.8b | -25.7 | |
P5 | 30 | 13 | 0.143a | 2.515ab | 2.649 | 0.084a | 36.5ab | -11.7 | |
P6 | 30 | 7 | 0.145a | 2.359ab | 2.485 | 0.079a | 36.9ab | -18.3 | |
橡胶 树热研7-33-97 | CK2 | 45 | 13 | 0.147a | 2.672b | 2.819 | 0.059b | 29.6b | |
R1 | 30 | 13 | 0.144a | 2.638b | 2.782 | 0.088a | 36.0a | 0.8 | |
R2 | 30 | 13 | 0.147a | 2.832ab | 2.979 | 0.094a | 36.7a | 6.0 | |
R3 | 30 | 13 | 0.142a | 2.851ab | 2.992 | 0.095a | 36.7a | 10.8 | |
R4 | 30 | 26 | 0.146a | 2.901a | 3.050 | 0.097a | 35.5a | 9.6 | |
R5 | 30 | 13 | 0.144a | 2.684b | 2.828 | 0.089a | 35.1a | 2.7 | |
R6 | 30 | 7 | 0.141a | 2.633b | 2.774 | 0.088a | 36.6a | 2.9 |
Tab. 2 Dry rubber yield and cumulative DRC of each treatment
品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 试后刀数 Tapping number after treatment | 涂药次数 Number of ethrel application | 试前单株产量 Yield per tree before treatment/ kg | 试后单株产量 Yield per tree after treatment/ kg | 全年单株产量 Annual yield per tree/kg | 刀次产 Annual yield per tree per tapping/kg | 累计DRC Cumulation DRC/% | 净增产率 Increase rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
橡胶树PR107 | CK1 | 45 | 13 | 0.141a | 2.807a | 2.948 | 0.062b | 29.2c | |
P1 | 30 | 13 | 0.137a | 1.853c | 1.990 | 0.062b | 38.6a | -32.1 | |
P2 | 30 | 13 | 0.140a | 2.026bc | 2.166 | 0.068b | 37.1a | -27.3 | |
P3 | 30 | 13 | 0.140a | 2.202ab | 2.343 | 0.073a | 36.5ab | -21.0 | |
P4 | 30 | 26 | 0.141a | 2.085bc | 2.226 | 0.069ab | 35.8b | -25.7 | |
P5 | 30 | 13 | 0.143a | 2.515ab | 2.649 | 0.084a | 36.5ab | -11.7 | |
P6 | 30 | 7 | 0.145a | 2.359ab | 2.485 | 0.079a | 36.9ab | -18.3 | |
橡胶 树热研7-33-97 | CK2 | 45 | 13 | 0.147a | 2.672b | 2.819 | 0.059b | 29.6b | |
R1 | 30 | 13 | 0.144a | 2.638b | 2.782 | 0.088a | 36.0a | 0.8 | |
R2 | 30 | 13 | 0.147a | 2.832ab | 2.979 | 0.094a | 36.7a | 6.0 | |
R3 | 30 | 13 | 0.142a | 2.851ab | 2.992 | 0.095a | 36.7a | 10.8 | |
R4 | 30 | 26 | 0.146a | 2.901a | 3.050 | 0.097a | 35.5a | 9.6 | |
R5 | 30 | 13 | 0.144a | 2.684b | 2.828 | 0.089a | 35.1a | 2.7 | |
R6 | 30 | 7 | 0.141a | 2.633b | 2.774 | 0.088a | 36.6a | 2.9 |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 硫醇含量 Thiols content/ (mmol·L-1) | 蔗糖含量 Sucrose content/ (mmol·L-1) | 无机磷含量 Inorganic phosphorus content/ (mmol·L-1) | 镁离子含量 Mg 2+content/ (mmol·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
橡胶树PR107 | CK1 | 1.047±0.029bc | 6.043±1.943b | 15.283±0.691ab | 28.511±3.922a |
P1 | 1.183±0.064a | 5.027±0.731bc | 11.897±0.649c | 29.133±3.365a | |
P2 | 1.133±0.006ab | 5.180±0.942bc | 12.403±0.298c | 27.489±2.036ab | |
P3 | 1.157±0.025a | 4.327±0.934c | 13.433±0.323bc | 28.689±1.148a | |
P4 | 1.030±0.108bc | 10.687±2.509a | 14.747±0.677ab | 22.244±3.585b | |
P5 | 1.087±0.075abc | 4.363±1.436c | 13.367±1.112bc | 25.689±3.278ab | |
P6 | 1.000±0.046bc | 4.990±1.552bc | 14.160±0.685b | 25.313±5.62ab | |
橡胶树热研7-33-97 | CK2 | 1.105±0.086a | 3.177±0.545abc | 15.753±0.218ab | 28.7333±2.82213ab |
R1 | 1.049±0.058a | 3.931±0.716a | 14.145±0.492c | 28.6889±1.00074b | |
R2 | 1.082±0.018a | 3.014±0.855abc | 14.633±0.364bc | 28.5111±3.92164ab | |
R3 | 1.080±0.072a | 3.478±0.580ab | 14.546±0.572bc | 25.8667±2.94241ab | |
R4 | 1.078±0.046a | 2.600±0.337bc | 16.036±0.490a | 29.6444±3.57854ab | |
R5 | 1.042±0.028a | 2.764±0.444bc | 15.283±0.690ab | 30.5667±1.34280a | |
R6 | 1.055±0.070a | 2.375±0.388c | 14.923±0.301abc | 29.4000±4.40151ab |
Tab. 3 Comparison of latex physiological parameters under d6 tapping system with different stimulation intensity
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 硫醇含量 Thiols content/ (mmol·L-1) | 蔗糖含量 Sucrose content/ (mmol·L-1) | 无机磷含量 Inorganic phosphorus content/ (mmol·L-1) | 镁离子含量 Mg 2+content/ (mmol·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
橡胶树PR107 | CK1 | 1.047±0.029bc | 6.043±1.943b | 15.283±0.691ab | 28.511±3.922a |
P1 | 1.183±0.064a | 5.027±0.731bc | 11.897±0.649c | 29.133±3.365a | |
P2 | 1.133±0.006ab | 5.180±0.942bc | 12.403±0.298c | 27.489±2.036ab | |
P3 | 1.157±0.025a | 4.327±0.934c | 13.433±0.323bc | 28.689±1.148a | |
P4 | 1.030±0.108bc | 10.687±2.509a | 14.747±0.677ab | 22.244±3.585b | |
P5 | 1.087±0.075abc | 4.363±1.436c | 13.367±1.112bc | 25.689±3.278ab | |
P6 | 1.000±0.046bc | 4.990±1.552bc | 14.160±0.685b | 25.313±5.62ab | |
橡胶树热研7-33-97 | CK2 | 1.105±0.086a | 3.177±0.545abc | 15.753±0.218ab | 28.7333±2.82213ab |
R1 | 1.049±0.058a | 3.931±0.716a | 14.145±0.492c | 28.6889±1.00074b | |
R2 | 1.082±0.018a | 3.014±0.855abc | 14.633±0.364bc | 28.5111±3.92164ab | |
R3 | 1.080±0.072a | 3.478±0.580ab | 14.546±0.572bc | 25.8667±2.94241ab | |
R4 | 1.078±0.046a | 2.600±0.337bc | 16.036±0.490a | 29.6444±3.57854ab | |
R5 | 1.042±0.028a | 2.764±0.444bc | 15.283±0.690ab | 30.5667±1.34280a | |
R6 | 1.055±0.070a | 2.375±0.388c | 14.923±0.301abc | 29.4000±4.40151ab |
橡胶树PR107 Hevea clone PR107 | 橡胶树热研7-33-97 Hevea clone Reyan7-33-97 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 新增死皮率 Ratio of now TPD tree /% | 新增四五级死皮率 Ratio of now TPD tree of level 4 and 5 /% | 死皮指数变化 Change of TPD index | 处理 Treatment | 新增死皮率 Ratio of now TPD tree /% | 新增四五级死皮率 Ratio of now TPD tree of level 4 and 5 /% | 死皮指数变化 Change of TPD index |
CK1 | 26.70 | 6.70 | 0.247 | CK2 | 23.30 | 3.30 | 0.210 |
P1 | 13.30 | 0.00 | 0.173 | R1 | 6.70 | 0.00 | 0.093 |
P2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.187 | R2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.053 |
P3 | 6.70 | 3.30 | 0.107 | R3 | 6.70 | 0.00 | 0.160 |
P4 | 23.10 | 5.00 | 0.269 | R4 | 26.70 | 1.70 | 0.247 |
P5 | 15.40 | 3.30 | 0.208 | R5 | 13.30 | 0.00 | 0.180 |
P6 | 15.40 | 0.00 | 0.209 | R6 | 6.70 | 0.00 | 0.083 |
Tab. 4 Comparison of the incidence of TPD under d6 tapping system with different stimulation intensity
橡胶树PR107 Hevea clone PR107 | 橡胶树热研7-33-97 Hevea clone Reyan7-33-97 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | 新增死皮率 Ratio of now TPD tree /% | 新增四五级死皮率 Ratio of now TPD tree of level 4 and 5 /% | 死皮指数变化 Change of TPD index | 处理 Treatment | 新增死皮率 Ratio of now TPD tree /% | 新增四五级死皮率 Ratio of now TPD tree of level 4 and 5 /% | 死皮指数变化 Change of TPD index |
CK1 | 26.70 | 6.70 | 0.247 | CK2 | 23.30 | 3.30 | 0.210 |
P1 | 13.30 | 0.00 | 0.173 | R1 | 6.70 | 0.00 | 0.093 |
P2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.187 | R2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.053 |
P3 | 6.70 | 3.30 | 0.107 | R3 | 6.70 | 0.00 | 0.160 |
P4 | 23.10 | 5.00 | 0.269 | R4 | 26.70 | 1.70 | 0.247 |
P5 | 15.40 | 3.30 | 0.208 | R5 | 13.30 | 0.00 | 0.180 |
P6 | 15.40 | 0.00 | 0.209 | R6 | 6.70 | 0.00 | 0.083 |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 5月 May | 6月 June | 7月 July | 8月 August | 9月 September | 10月 October | 11月 November | 12月 December |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
橡胶树PR107 | CK1 | 0.035 | 0.063 | 0.050 | 0.058 | 0.059 | 0.068 | 0.067 | 0.070 |
(1.26%) | (2.23%) | (1.79%) | (2.05%) | (2.09%) | (2.43%) | (2.40%) | (2.49%) | ||
P1 | 0.034 | 0.053 | 0.049 | 0.046 | 0.052 | 0.075 | 0.070 | 0.087 | |
(1.85%) | (2.85%) | (2.65%) | (2.48%) | (2.78%) | (4.05%) | (3.78%) | (4.69%) | ||
P2 | 0.035 | 0.052 | 0.055 | 0.054 | 0.055 | 0.078 | 0.085 | 0.094 | |
(1.72%) | (2.55%) | (2.74%) | (2.66%) | (2.73%) | (3.85%) | (4.17%) | (4.65%) | ||
P3 | 0.035 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.058 | 0.066 | 0.087 | 0.079 | 0.100 | |
(1.59%) | (2.78%) | (2.77%) | (2.63%) | (3.02%) | (3.95%) | (3.57%) | (4.53%) | ||
P4 | 0.035 | 0.072 | 0.089 | 0.077 | 0.072 | 0.068 | 0.053 | 0.054 | |
(1.70%) | (3.47%) | (4.29%) | (3.71%) | (3.46%) | (3.28%) | (2.53%) | (2.57%) | ||
P5 | 0.033 | 0.064 | 0.076 | 0.068 | 0.074 | 0.092 | 0.108 | 0.105 | |
(1.32%) | (2.56%) | (3.03%) | (2.69%) | (2.94%) | (3.66%) | (4.30%) | (4.17%) | ||
P6 | 0.031 | 0.057 | 0.065 | 0.062 | 0.078 | 0.091 | 0.098 | 0.097 | |
(1.33%) | (2.41%) | (2.74%) | (2.62%) | (3.30%) | (3.88%) | (4.14%) | (4.11%) | ||
橡胶树热研7-33-97 | CK2 | 0.037 | 0.044 | 0.040 | 0.051 | 0.055 | 0.061 | 0.064 | 0.06 |
(1.31%) | (1.56%) | (1.42%) | (1.81%) | (1.95%) | (2.16%) | (2.27%) | (2.13%) | ||
R1 | 0.036 | 0.058 | 0.058 | 0.062 | 0.089 | 0.106 | 0.116 | 0.127 | |
(1.30%) | (2.09%) | (2.10%) | (2.24%) | (3.20%) | (3.82%) | (4.17%) | (4.56%) | ||
R2 | 0.037 | 0.064 | 0.058 | 0.062 | 0.093 | 0.110 | 0.135 | 0.144 | |
(1.23%) | (2.13%) | (1.95%) | (2.08%) | (3.11%) | (3.68%) | (4.53%) | (4.84%) | ||
R3 | 0.035 | 0.062 | 0.057 | 0.067 | 0.098 | 0.119 | 0.125 | 0.138 | |
(1.18%) | (2.09%) | (1.89%) | (2.23%) | (3.27%) | (3.99%) | (4.17%) | (4.63%) | ||
R4 | 0.037 | 0.071 | 0.084 | 0.083 | 0.073 | 0.113 | 0.119 | 0.128 | |
(1.22%) | (2.33%) | (2.74%) | (2.71%) | (2.40%) | (3.72%) | (3.91%) | (4.21%) | ||
R5 | 0.036 | 0.064 | 0.062 | 0.069 | 0.071 | 0.109 | 0.123 | 0.121 | |
(1.27%) | (2.27%) | (2.21%) | (2.45%) | (2.51%) | (3.84%) | (4.33%) | (4.29%) | ||
R6 | 0.035 | 0.062 | 0.064 | 0.067 | 0.060 | 0.104 | 0.124 | 0.128 | |
(1.27%) | (2.22%) | (2.29%) | (2.42%) | (2.18%) | (3.73%) | (4.47%) | (4.61%) |
Tab. 5 Comparison on the monthly average yield (kg) and percentage ratio to annual yield of different months in each treatment
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 5月 May | 6月 June | 7月 July | 8月 August | 9月 September | 10月 October | 11月 November | 12月 December |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
橡胶树PR107 | CK1 | 0.035 | 0.063 | 0.050 | 0.058 | 0.059 | 0.068 | 0.067 | 0.070 |
(1.26%) | (2.23%) | (1.79%) | (2.05%) | (2.09%) | (2.43%) | (2.40%) | (2.49%) | ||
P1 | 0.034 | 0.053 | 0.049 | 0.046 | 0.052 | 0.075 | 0.070 | 0.087 | |
(1.85%) | (2.85%) | (2.65%) | (2.48%) | (2.78%) | (4.05%) | (3.78%) | (4.69%) | ||
P2 | 0.035 | 0.052 | 0.055 | 0.054 | 0.055 | 0.078 | 0.085 | 0.094 | |
(1.72%) | (2.55%) | (2.74%) | (2.66%) | (2.73%) | (3.85%) | (4.17%) | (4.65%) | ||
P3 | 0.035 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.058 | 0.066 | 0.087 | 0.079 | 0.100 | |
(1.59%) | (2.78%) | (2.77%) | (2.63%) | (3.02%) | (3.95%) | (3.57%) | (4.53%) | ||
P4 | 0.035 | 0.072 | 0.089 | 0.077 | 0.072 | 0.068 | 0.053 | 0.054 | |
(1.70%) | (3.47%) | (4.29%) | (3.71%) | (3.46%) | (3.28%) | (2.53%) | (2.57%) | ||
P5 | 0.033 | 0.064 | 0.076 | 0.068 | 0.074 | 0.092 | 0.108 | 0.105 | |
(1.32%) | (2.56%) | (3.03%) | (2.69%) | (2.94%) | (3.66%) | (4.30%) | (4.17%) | ||
P6 | 0.031 | 0.057 | 0.065 | 0.062 | 0.078 | 0.091 | 0.098 | 0.097 | |
(1.33%) | (2.41%) | (2.74%) | (2.62%) | (3.30%) | (3.88%) | (4.14%) | (4.11%) | ||
橡胶树热研7-33-97 | CK2 | 0.037 | 0.044 | 0.040 | 0.051 | 0.055 | 0.061 | 0.064 | 0.06 |
(1.31%) | (1.56%) | (1.42%) | (1.81%) | (1.95%) | (2.16%) | (2.27%) | (2.13%) | ||
R1 | 0.036 | 0.058 | 0.058 | 0.062 | 0.089 | 0.106 | 0.116 | 0.127 | |
(1.30%) | (2.09%) | (2.10%) | (2.24%) | (3.20%) | (3.82%) | (4.17%) | (4.56%) | ||
R2 | 0.037 | 0.064 | 0.058 | 0.062 | 0.093 | 0.110 | 0.135 | 0.144 | |
(1.23%) | (2.13%) | (1.95%) | (2.08%) | (3.11%) | (3.68%) | (4.53%) | (4.84%) | ||
R3 | 0.035 | 0.062 | 0.057 | 0.067 | 0.098 | 0.119 | 0.125 | 0.138 | |
(1.18%) | (2.09%) | (1.89%) | (2.23%) | (3.27%) | (3.99%) | (4.17%) | (4.63%) | ||
R4 | 0.037 | 0.071 | 0.084 | 0.083 | 0.073 | 0.113 | 0.119 | 0.128 | |
(1.22%) | (2.33%) | (2.74%) | (2.71%) | (2.40%) | (3.72%) | (3.91%) | (4.21%) | ||
R5 | 0.036 | 0.064 | 0.062 | 0.069 | 0.071 | 0.109 | 0.123 | 0.121 | |
(1.27%) | (2.27%) | (2.21%) | (2.45%) | (2.51%) | (3.84%) | (4.33%) | (4.29%) | ||
R6 | 0.035 | 0.062 | 0.064 | 0.067 | 0.060 | 0.104 | 0.124 | 0.128 | |
(1.27%) | (2.22%) | (2.29%) | (2.42%) | (2.18%) | (3.73%) | (4.47%) | (4.61%) |
[1] | 李春 . 中国天然橡胶产业演化及其影响因素研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2018. |
[2] | 施晓佳, 梁栋, 汝绍锋 , 等. 中国天然橡胶割胶产业的发展与探索[J]. 价值工程, 2018,37(30):275-277. |
[3] | 许闻献, 曾庆, 黄文成 . 中国橡胶树割制改革30年[J]. 热带农业科学, 2000(6):57-71. |
[4] | 谢黎黎, 黄志, 邓槐彪 , 等. 热研7-33-97新开割树对超低频割胶制度的适应性研究初报[J]. 中国热带农业, 2017(4):53-56. |
[5] | 黄学全, 蒋超 . 海南垦区橡胶树超低频六天一刀割制研究[J]. 橡胶科技, 2018, 16(5):19-24. |
[6] | Soumahin E F, Christophe A B Y, Charlotte T D , et al. Production systems to minimize the latex harvesting cost of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis)[J]. European Scientific Journal, 2018,14(30):190-205. |
[7] | 张晓飞, 胡彦师, 黄华孙 , 等. 橡胶树优良亲本PR107的研究与利用[J]. 热带农业科学, 2015,35(4):39-44. |
[8] | 黄德宝, 秦云霞, 唐朝荣 . 橡胶树三个品系(热研8-79、热研7-33-97和PR107)胶乳生理参数的比较研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2010,18(2):170-175. |
[9] | 校现周, 魏小弟, 罗世巧 , 等. 《橡胶树五天一刀割制技术要点》(试行)已编写完成[J]. 热带农业科学, 2004(1):71-72. |
[10] | 杨少琼, 何宝玲 . 橡胶树乳管系统功能的胶乳诊断——Ⅰ.硫醇含量的测定[J]. 热带作物研究, 1989(1):65-68. |
[11] | Boyne A F, Ellman G L . A methodology for analysis of tissue sulfhydryl components[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1972,46(2):639-653. |
[12] | Ashwell G . Colorimetric analysis of sugars[J]. Methods in Enzymology, 1957,3:73-105. |
[13] | Taussky H H, Shorr E . A microcolorimetric method for the determination of inorganic phosphorus[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1953,202(2):675-685. |
[14] | 谭德冠, 姚庆收, 张伟算 , 等. 10个橡胶树新品系幼龄试割期间生理参数的分析与比较[J]. 热带农业科学, 2004,24(1):1-6, 14. |
[15] | 校现周, 许闻献, 罗世巧 , 等. 橡胶树微割技术若干问题的研究[J]. 热带农业科学, 1998(5):1-6. |
[16] | 校现周 . 对天然橡胶产业面临困境的思考[J]. 中国热带农业, 2016(1):4-5. |
[17] | 何晶, 冯成天, 郭秀丽 , 等. 高浓度乙烯利刺激诱导橡胶树死皮发生过程中的胶乳生理研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018,33(2):123-128. |
[18] | 魏芳, 吴明, 罗世巧 , 等. 乙烯利刺激对橡胶树热研7-33-97幼龄开割树的乳胶生理影响[J]. 西部林业科学, 2014,43(3):93-98. |
[19] | 陈小敏, 刘少军, 张京红 , 等. 海南岛橡胶割胶期的气候适宜度变化特征分析[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2019,42(2):35-41. |
[1] | ZHANG Yuhang,PAN Ranran,LI Fei,TAO Zhiqiang,WANG Ying,GAO Heqiong,ZHUANG Nansheng. Cloning, Physical Location and Expression Analysis of HbGRF in Hevea brasiliensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(9): 1723-1732. |
[2] | YANG Xingxing,WANG Ying,ZHUANG Nansheng,GAO Heqiong,WANG Yuxiang. Single-microspore Microdissection of Hevea brasiliensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(8): 1522-1528. |
[3] | LI Boxun,LIU Xianbao,SHI Tao,CAI Jimiao,ZHENG Xiaolan,FENG Yanli,XU Chunhua,HUANG Guixiu. Identification and Etiology of a New Dangerous Neopestalotiopsis Leaf Fall Disease of Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis) in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(8): 1616-1624. |
[4] | YUAN Fei,LIU Zifan,YAN Wenjing,LIU Peipei. Allelopathy of Root Exudates and Aqueous Extracts from Soil of Cassava to Rigidoprus lignosu and Corynespora cassiicola of Hevea brasiliensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(8): 1708-1713. |
[5] | YANG Tian,ZHAO Qi,LI Xiaoqin,ZHANG Fengliang,MAO Changli,HU Yonghua,WU Yu. Variations Analysis of Latex Yield and Physiological Traits in Hevea brasiliensis Wickham Germplasm Resources [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 893-900. |
[6] | ZHANG Yuanyuan,PU Shouqin,HU Yanshi,FANG Jialin,HUANG Xiao,LI Weiguo,HUANG Huasun. Ploidy Identification of Germplasm Resources in Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A. Juss.) Müll. Arg. [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(3): 457-463. |
[7] | TANG Chaorong. Research Progress on Biology of Rubber Production in Rubber Tree [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(10): 1958-1967. |
[8] | XUE Xinxin,WU Xiaoping,LUO Xuehua,WANG Wenbin,WANG Dapeng,ZHANG Yongfa,ZHAO Chunmei. Effects of Potassium and Magnesium Deficiency on Leaf Physiological Characteristics and Chloroplast Ultrastructure of Anther Culture Seedling of Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis) [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(8): 1507-1514. |
[9] | HU Yiyu,FENG Chengtian,LIU Hui,YUAN Kun,XIE Guishui,WANG Zhenhui. Preparation Technology Optimization of Sodium Alginate / Chitosan Based Tapping Panel Dryness (TPD) Rehabilitation Nutrition Microcapsule in Hevea brasiliensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(7): 1379-1386. |
[10] | YUAN Huifang,HUANG Jing,YUE Hai,TIAN Yaohua. Effects of Water-retention Treatment on the Physiological Characteristics and Latex Yield of Hevea brasiliensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(11): 2097-2104. |
[11] | YAN Wenjing,LIU Zifan,ZHANG Tingting,SU Jianmin,ZHAO Xuemei. Allelopathy of Water Extracts from Cassava Organs and Decomposing Products to Rigidoporus lignosus of Hevea brasiliensis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(1): 123-129. |
[12] | LI Guanjun,LI Tongtong,LI Min,LI Xiaowen,JIANG Huichuan,LU Quanji,LI Jianing. Effect of Heat Treatment Temperature on Starch Content of Rubberwood [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(1): 180-183. |
[13] | WEI Liping,TIAN Yaohua,ZHOU Huiping,YAN Xiangshuai,GONG Yanxiong,YUAN Huifang. The Influence of Shade Treatment on Leaf Anatomical Characteristics and Growth of Different Rubber Variaties [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(1): 45-53. |
[14] | TAN Deguan,PENG Jing,HAN Bingying,FU Lili,SUN Xuepiao,ZHANG Jiaming. Histochemical and Molecular Characterization of Laticifer Cells in Calli Derived from Petioles of Rubber Tree [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(1): 73-78. |
[15] | ZHANG Yuanyuan GAO Xinsheng ZHANG Xiaofei HUANG Xiao LI Weiguo. Early Identification of Different Hybrid of CATAS 7-33-97 Rubber Tree [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2015, 36(8): 1369-1374. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||