Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 987-994.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.05.022
• Agricultural Product Processing, Preservation, Storage, Analysis and Detection • Previous Articles Next Articles
JU Xueli1,TAN Haisheng2,YANG Jinsong1,*(),GUO Haiyang1,SHI Yike1,WU Yunxue3
Received:
2018-09-06
Revised:
2019-01-06
Online:
2019-05-25
Published:
2019-05-31
Contact:
Jinsong YANG
CLC Number:
JU Xueli,TAN Haisheng,YANG Jinsong,GUO Haiyang,SHI Yike,WU Yunxue. Optimization of Fermentation Technology for Yellow Wine from Acerola Cherry and Rice by Response Surface Methodology[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(5): 987-994.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.05.022
水平 Level | (A)液料比 Liquid to material ratio /(mL?g-1) | (B)针叶樱桃果浆 添加量 Acerola cherry added /% | (C)发酵温度 Fermentation temperature /℃ |
---|---|---|---|
-1 | 0.5 | 15 | 20 |
0 | 1.0 | 30 | 24 |
1 | 1.5 | 45 | 28 |
Tab. 1 Factors and levels of the response surface methodology of the fermentation process of yellow wine from acerola cherry and rice
水平 Level | (A)液料比 Liquid to material ratio /(mL?g-1) | (B)针叶樱桃果浆 添加量 Acerola cherry added /% | (C)发酵温度 Fermentation temperature /℃ |
---|---|---|---|
-1 | 0.5 | 15 | 20 |
0 | 1.0 | 30 | 24 |
1 | 1.5 | 45 | 28 |
指标 Index | 标准 Criteria | 得分Sensory score |
---|---|---|
外观 Appearance (20分) | 浅黄色,清亮透明,光泽性好 | 18~20 |
浅黄色,清亮透明,光泽性较好 | 15~17 | |
浅黄色,透明,光泽略差 | 12~14 | |
浅黄色,微浑,透明但光泽差 | 9~11 | |
浑浊,失光,缺乏酒体应有的色泽 | <9 | |
香气 Aroma (30分) | 具有黄酒及针叶樱桃的香气,酒香和果香醇厚浓郁 | 26~30 |
具有黄酒及针叶樱桃的香气,酒香和果香不够浓郁 | 20~25 | |
具有黄酒及针叶樱桃的香气,酒香和果香香味淡薄 | 16~19 | |
酒香和果香比例不协调,酒香过重或果香过重 | 10~15 | |
无黄酒特有的香气,有异香 | <10 | |
口感 Mouthfeel (30分) | 醇厚,柔和鲜爽,口感好,无异味 | 26~30 |
醇厚,较柔和鲜爽,口感好,无异味 | 20~25 | |
尚醇厚鲜爽,口感较好,无异味 | 16~19 | |
不够醇厚鲜爽,口感差,有酸味、无异味 | 10~15 | |
不够醇厚鲜爽,口感差,酸味重、有苦涩味 | <10 | |
风格 Note (20分) | 酒体组分丰满协调,针叶樱桃黄酒独特的风格突出 | 18~20 |
酒体组分协调,针叶樱桃黄酒独特的风格突出 | 15~17 | |
酒体组分尚协调,针叶樱桃黄酒独特的风格较突出 | 12~14 | |
酒体组分不够协调,针叶樱桃黄酒的风格不够突出 | 9~11 | |
酒体协调性差,针叶樱桃黄酒的风格不明 | <9 |
Tab. 2 Sensory scoring criteria of yellow wine from acerola cherry and rice
指标 Index | 标准 Criteria | 得分Sensory score |
---|---|---|
外观 Appearance (20分) | 浅黄色,清亮透明,光泽性好 | 18~20 |
浅黄色,清亮透明,光泽性较好 | 15~17 | |
浅黄色,透明,光泽略差 | 12~14 | |
浅黄色,微浑,透明但光泽差 | 9~11 | |
浑浊,失光,缺乏酒体应有的色泽 | <9 | |
香气 Aroma (30分) | 具有黄酒及针叶樱桃的香气,酒香和果香醇厚浓郁 | 26~30 |
具有黄酒及针叶樱桃的香气,酒香和果香不够浓郁 | 20~25 | |
具有黄酒及针叶樱桃的香气,酒香和果香香味淡薄 | 16~19 | |
酒香和果香比例不协调,酒香过重或果香过重 | 10~15 | |
无黄酒特有的香气,有异香 | <10 | |
口感 Mouthfeel (30分) | 醇厚,柔和鲜爽,口感好,无异味 | 26~30 |
醇厚,较柔和鲜爽,口感好,无异味 | 20~25 | |
尚醇厚鲜爽,口感较好,无异味 | 16~19 | |
不够醇厚鲜爽,口感差,有酸味、无异味 | 10~15 | |
不够醇厚鲜爽,口感差,酸味重、有苦涩味 | <10 | |
风格 Note (20分) | 酒体组分丰满协调,针叶樱桃黄酒独特的风格突出 | 18~20 |
酒体组分协调,针叶樱桃黄酒独特的风格突出 | 15~17 | |
酒体组分尚协调,针叶樱桃黄酒独特的风格较突出 | 12~14 | |
酒体组分不够协调,针叶樱桃黄酒的风格不够突出 | 9~11 | |
酒体协调性差,针叶樱桃黄酒的风格不明 | <9 |
试验号 No. | A | B | C | 感官评分 Sensory score |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 81 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 |
3 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 80 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94 |
5 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 84 |
6 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 88 |
7 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 84 |
8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 91 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96 |
10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 92 |
11 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 83 |
12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 |
13 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 82 |
14 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 88 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96 |
16 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 86 |
17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 88 |
Tab. 3 Design and result of Box-Behnken experiment on fermentation process of the wine
试验号 No. | A | B | C | 感官评分 Sensory score |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 81 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 |
3 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 80 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94 |
5 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 84 |
6 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 88 |
7 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 84 |
8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 91 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96 |
10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 92 |
11 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 83 |
12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 |
13 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 82 |
14 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 88 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96 |
16 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 86 |
17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 88 |
来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方 Meansquare | F值 Fvalue | P值 P-value | 显著性 Significant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 483.07 | 9 | 53.67 | 34.00 | <0.0001 | ** |
A | 6.13 | 1 | 6.13 | 3.88 | 0.0895 | |
B | 32.00 | 1 | 32.00 | 20.27 | 0.0028 | ** |
C | 91.13 | 1 | 91.13 | 57.73 | 0.0001 | ** |
AB | 4.00 | 1 | 4.00 | 2.53 | 0.1554 | |
AC | 20.25 | 1 | 20.25 | 12.83 | 0.0090 | ** |
BC | 1.00 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.4522 | |
A2 | 114.95 | 1 | 114.95 | 72.82 | <0.0001 | ** |
B2 | 104.21 | 1 | 104.21 | 66.02 | <0.0001 | ** |
C2 | 75.16 | 1 | 75.16 | 47.61 | 0.0002 | ** |
残 差 Residual | 11.05 | 7 | 1.58 | |||
失拟项 Lack of fit | 8.25 | 3 | 2.75 | 3.93 | 0.1097 | |
纯误差 Pure error | 2.80 | 4 | 0.70 | |||
总 和 Cor total | 494.12 | 16 | ||||
R2=0.9776,R2Adj =0.9489 |
Tab. 4 Analysis of variance based on the sensory evaluation as the response value regression model
来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方 Meansquare | F值 Fvalue | P值 P-value | 显著性 Significant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 483.07 | 9 | 53.67 | 34.00 | <0.0001 | ** |
A | 6.13 | 1 | 6.13 | 3.88 | 0.0895 | |
B | 32.00 | 1 | 32.00 | 20.27 | 0.0028 | ** |
C | 91.13 | 1 | 91.13 | 57.73 | 0.0001 | ** |
AB | 4.00 | 1 | 4.00 | 2.53 | 0.1554 | |
AC | 20.25 | 1 | 20.25 | 12.83 | 0.0090 | ** |
BC | 1.00 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.4522 | |
A2 | 114.95 | 1 | 114.95 | 72.82 | <0.0001 | ** |
B2 | 104.21 | 1 | 104.21 | 66.02 | <0.0001 | ** |
C2 | 75.16 | 1 | 75.16 | 47.61 | 0.0002 | ** |
残 差 Residual | 11.05 | 7 | 1.58 | |||
失拟项 Lack of fit | 8.25 | 3 | 2.75 | 3.93 | 0.1097 | |
纯误差 Pure error | 2.80 | 4 | 0.70 | |||
总 和 Cor total | 494.12 | 16 | ||||
R2=0.9776,R2Adj =0.9489 |
Fig. 6 Response surface plots and contour line of effects of interaction between fermentation temperature, liquid to material ratio and acerola cherry on sensory evaluation
[1] | 钟义红, 孙杰, 李世芬 , 等. 针叶樱桃提取物增强小鼠细胞与体液免疫功能[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2014,34(12):76-80. |
[2] | 何明霞, 胡庭兴, 费世民 . 西印度樱桃的引种栽培和开发利用研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2007,28(2):90-93. |
[3] | Mezadri T, Fernandez-Pachon M S, Villano D , et al. The acerola fruit: composition, productive characteristics and eco-nomic importance[J]. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion, 2006,56(2):101-109. |
[4] | 罗国向, 张佳, 孙云飞 , 等. 针叶樱桃汁加工贮藏过程中维生素C含量的变化[J]. 食品与生物技术学报, 2014,36(7):732-735. |
[5] |
Mezadri T, Villano D, Fernandez-Pachon M S , et al. Antioxidant compounds and antioxidant activity in acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC.) fruits and derivatives[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2008,21(4):282-290.
DOI URL |
[6] | 高令才, 惠勇, 贺金龙 . 维生素C的作用机制及临床应用新进展[J]. 医药前沿, 2011,16(1):106-108. |
[7] | 王领, 何聪芬, 董银卯 , 等. 西印度樱桃冻干粉水提液抗氧化性的研究[J]. 香料香精化妆品, 2009,37(6):14-16. |
[8] | 倪莉, 吕旭聪, 黄志清 , 等. 黄酒的生理功效及其生理活性物质研究进展[J]. 中国食品学报, 2012,12(3):1-7. |
[9] | 杨劲松, 钟春燕 . 酿酒工艺学[M]. 海口: 海南出版社, 2011: 92-153. |
[10] |
周桃英, 罗登宏, 李杏元 , 等. 菠萝糯米酒的研制[J]. 中国酿造, 2009,28(11):170-171.
DOI |
[11] |
郭睿, 杨玲, 郭旭凯 , 等. 糯高粱黄酒糖化工艺优化及抗氧化活性分析[J]. 中国酿造, 2016,35(5):102-106.
DOI |
[12] |
崔闯, 任清 . 响应面法优化黄酒酿造工艺[J]. 食品科学, 2015,36(11):134-139.
DOI |
[13] | 赵翾, 刘功良, 李红良 , 等. 响应面法优化香梨米酒的发酵工艺研究[J]. 中国酿造, 2017,36(10):186-189. |
[14] | 王兴龙, 袁敏, 袁留征 , 等. 黄酒中安全风险性物质及控制的研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵科技, 2015,51(1):96-100. |
[15] |
汪建国, 汪琪 . 黄酒醪酸败原因分析及预防措施[J]. 中国酿造, 2005,24(8):36-39.
DOI |
[16] | 曹敬华, 史路路, 蔡凤娇 , 等. 茯苓养生黄酒酿造工艺研究[J]. 酿酒, 2014,41(3):68-72. |
[17] | Peng B, Lei Y, Zhao H , et al. Response surface methodology for optimization of fermentation process parameters for improving apple wine quality[J]. Food Science Technology, 2015,52(11):7513-7518. |
[18] | 黄瑶, 廖春燕, 廖兰 , 等. 不同工艺酿制糯米黄酒的研究[J]. 广西工学院学报, 2013,24(2):78-80. |
[19] | 何国庆 . 食品发酵与酿造工艺学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001: 192-200. |
[1] | HUANG Qiong,HUANG Xiaomei. Ultrasound-microwave Assisted Extraction and Antioxidant Activity of Total Flavonoids from Hibiscus sabdariffa L. [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1242-1250. |
[2] | FANG Yiming,CHU Zhong,GU Fenglin,HE Shuzhen,LAI Jianxiong. Optimization of Extraction of Procyanidin from Cocoa Bean of Hainan Using Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 779-786. |
[3] | DUAN Yajie,MEI Zhigang,SUN Dequan,LI Weiming,PANG Zhencai,HU Huigang. Optimization of Fermentation Conditions of Antagonistic Actinomycetes FS-4 [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(2): 339-345. |
[4] | LIANG Jie, LIU Tao, ZHANG Chaoxia, CAI Lifeng. Preparation and Optimization of Loquat Seeds Based on Microporous Carbon via Response Surface Method and Study on Its Selective [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(8): 1651-1658. |
[5] | CHU Zhong, GUO Ying, ZHANG Yanjun, HE Shuzhen, QIAN Lei. Extraction Optimization and Analysis of Volatile Components of Instant Mallotus oblongifolius [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(3): 588-594. |
[6] | ZHAN Junling, HUANGFU Yangxin, GAO Ziyi, ZHAO Erlao. Ultrasonic-Microwave Assisted Extraction of Total Flavonoids from Houttuyniae Herba and Its Antioxidant Activity [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(10): 2067-2073. |
[7] | ZHANG Yanjun ZHU Hongmei TIAN Jianwen XU Fei CHU Zhong. Formulation and Preparation Technique of Vanilla Oil Microcapsuled by Jackfruit Seed Starch [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(6): 1127-1133. |
[8] | XUE Yaru , CAO Ran , LU Xu , ZHANG Yi. Response Surface Model Optimization of Oligosaccharide Extraction from Coix Seed by Ultrasonic-assisted Technology#br# [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(3): 565-571. |
[9] | ZANG Tao XIANG Dong. Optimization of Water Extraction of Total Polyphenols from Nymphaea stellata Willd by Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(12): 2366-2375. |
[10] | DAI Yanli SHEN Weizhi LIAO Sentai LIU Fan WANG Siyuan HU Genteng ZOU Yuxiao. Optimization of Ultrasonic-assisted Extraction Process of Mulberry Polyphenols Using Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(8): 1588-1594. |
[11] | ZHANG Yan WU Jijun LIU Xueming WANG Siyuan FU Manqin. Optimization of Extraction Process for Pectin from the Pericarp of Pomelo by Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(8): 1595-1600. |
[12] | ZHANG Ronghu XIA Yijie DOU Zhihao HE Ai XIE Hui DENG Hao FENG Jiancheng. Optimization of Extracting Technology and Antioxidant Activity in vitro of Polyphenol from Pericarp of Baccaurea [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(5): 1009-1016. |
[13] | YANG Huiqiang BAI Xinpeng Lü Xiaoya, LI Ruonan ZHANG Yuxiang CAI Jinhong. Preparation of Fat Substitute Using Enzymatic Denatured Jackfruit Seed Starch [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(4): 809-816. |
[14] | MENG Qixuan WU Yougen CUI Mengyuan YUAN Langxing ZHANG Junfeng. Optimization of Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenol from NONI Using Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2015, 36(9): 1672-1679. |
[15] | LI Jing ZHAO Qingsheng ZHOU Weijie ZHAO Shihao. Optimization of Ultrasonic-assisted Extraction of Polysaccharides from Blueberries by Response Surface Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2015, 36(8): 1491-1497. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||