Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 657-663.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.04.005
• Crop Culture and Nutrition,Genetic Breeding • Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Hongmin1,LUO Meiling1,YANG Xuemei3,WANG Wei1,YANG Bin3,LI Jiahua1,*(),ZHAO Ping2,*(
)
Received:
2018-07-21
Revised:
2018-10-22
Online:
2019-04-15
Published:
2019-05-21
Contact:
Jiahua LI,Ping ZHAO
TIAN Hongmin,LUO Meiling,YANG Xuemei,WANG Wei,YANG Bin,LI Jiahua,ZHAO Ping. The Impact on Soil Nutrient of the Tea-Walnut Intercropping[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(4): 657-663.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.04.005
地点 Places | 海拔 Altitude/m | 经度 Longitude | 纬度 Latitude | 核桃种植年限 Walnut planting years/a |
---|---|---|---|---|
昌宁县翁堵乡 | 1807.0 | 99°589′ | 24°694′ | 6~30 |
昌宁县田园镇 | 2031.0 | 99°735′ | 24°779′ | 6~30 |
昌宁县翁兴村 | 1798.0 | 99°589′ | 24°694′ | 6~30 |
昌宁县温泉乡 | 1990.0 | 99°750′ | 24°736′ | 6~30 |
Tab. 1 Basic information of soil samples
地点 Places | 海拔 Altitude/m | 经度 Longitude | 纬度 Latitude | 核桃种植年限 Walnut planting years/a |
---|---|---|---|---|
昌宁县翁堵乡 | 1807.0 | 99°589′ | 24°694′ | 6~30 |
昌宁县田园镇 | 2031.0 | 99°735′ | 24°779′ | 6~30 |
昌宁县翁兴村 | 1798.0 | 99°589′ | 24°694′ | 6~30 |
昌宁县温泉乡 | 1990.0 | 99°750′ | 24°736′ | 6~30 |
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤pH The pH of the soil | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 5.19a | 4.89c | 5.57a | 4.30d | 5.38a | 4.88c | 7.45a | 4.67d |
2 m | 5.07b | 5.50a | 5.30a | 7.40a | |||||
3 m | 5.00b | 5.14c | 5.31a | 6.28c | |||||
平均 | 5.09b | 5.40b | 5.26b | 7.04b | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 5.12a | 4.85c | 4.92a | 4.20e | 5.31a | 4.85d | 7.02a | 4.69d |
2 m | 5.00b | 4.82b | 5.30a | 7.02a | |||||
3 m | 5.01b | 4.56d | 5.26c | 6.51c | |||||
平均 | 5.04b | 4.77c | 5.29b | 6.85b |
Tab. 2 Analysis results of soil pH values of tea-walnut intercropping gardens and the single cropping tea garden
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤pH The pH of the soil | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 5.19a | 4.89c | 5.57a | 4.30d | 5.38a | 4.88c | 7.45a | 4.67d |
2 m | 5.07b | 5.50a | 5.30a | 7.40a | |||||
3 m | 5.00b | 5.14c | 5.31a | 6.28c | |||||
平均 | 5.09b | 5.40b | 5.26b | 7.04b | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 5.12a | 4.85c | 4.92a | 4.20e | 5.31a | 4.85d | 7.02a | 4.69d |
2 m | 5.00b | 4.82b | 5.30a | 7.02a | |||||
3 m | 5.01b | 4.56d | 5.26c | 6.51c | |||||
平均 | 5.04b | 4.77c | 5.29b | 6.85b |
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤的有机质 Organic matter of the soil/(g?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 40.88a | 26.22e | 40.05a | 30.95e | 42.90a | 13.47e | 17.74c | 27.54a |
2 m | 37.70b | 37.21c | 40.96b | 14.24e | |||||
3 m | 31.77d | 35.05d | 37.81d | 20.66b | |||||
平均 | 36.78c | 37.44b | 40.56c | 17.55d | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 38.81a | 25.43e | 37.55a | 28.79e | 41.25a | 17.18e | 19.02c | 27.72a |
2 m | 34.53b | 36.53b | 38.15c | 21.88b | |||||
3 m | 29.49d | 33.00d | 35.76d | 13.83e | |||||
平均 | 34.28c | 35.69c | 38.39b | 18.24d |
Tab. 3 Analysis results of soil organic matter content of the tea-walnut intercropping garden
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤的有机质 Organic matter of the soil/(g?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 40.88a | 26.22e | 40.05a | 30.95e | 42.90a | 13.47e | 17.74c | 27.54a |
2 m | 37.70b | 37.21c | 40.96b | 14.24e | |||||
3 m | 31.77d | 35.05d | 37.81d | 20.66b | |||||
平均 | 36.78c | 37.44b | 40.56c | 17.55d | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 38.81a | 25.43e | 37.55a | 28.79e | 41.25a | 17.18e | 19.02c | 27.72a |
2 m | 34.53b | 36.53b | 38.15c | 21.88b | |||||
3 m | 29.49d | 33.00d | 35.76d | 13.83e | |||||
平均 | 34.28c | 35.69c | 38.39b | 18.24d |
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤的碱解氮 Available nitrogen of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 98.00a | 46.90e | 127.40a | 64.40e | 133.00a | 40.95e | 60.20e | 99.40a |
2 m | 79.10c | 126.00b | 120.05c | 65.80c | |||||
3 m | 75.60d | 119.70d | 114.80d | 67.20b | |||||
平均 | 84.23b | 124.37c | 122.62b | 64.40d | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 95.90a | 48.30e | 124.60a | 64.40e | 124.60a | 46.57e | 60.90e | 80.50a |
2 m | 92.05c | 102.20c | 118.30b | 70.00b | |||||
3 m | 91.70d | 88.24d | 105.35d | 62.30d | |||||
平均 | 93.22b | 105.01b | 116.08c | 64.40c |
Tab. 4 Analysis results of soil alkali-nitrogen content of the tea-walnut intercropping garden
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤的碱解氮 Available nitrogen of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 98.00a | 46.90e | 127.40a | 64.40e | 133.00a | 40.95e | 60.20e | 99.40a |
2 m | 79.10c | 126.00b | 120.05c | 65.80c | |||||
3 m | 75.60d | 119.70d | 114.80d | 67.20b | |||||
平均 | 84.23b | 124.37c | 122.62b | 64.40d | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 95.90a | 48.30e | 124.60a | 64.40e | 124.60a | 46.57e | 60.90e | 80.50a |
2 m | 92.05c | 102.20c | 118.30b | 70.00b | |||||
3 m | 91.70d | 88.24d | 105.35d | 62.30d | |||||
平均 | 93.22b | 105.01b | 116.08c | 64.40c |
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤的速效磷 Available P of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 12.12a | 1.80e | 7.50a | 2.21e | 30.26a | 3.19d | 0.17d | 34.39a |
2 m | 8.25c | 7.04b | 25.90c | 0.35b | |||||
3 m | 7.26d | 3.05d | 25.90c | 0.35b | |||||
平均 | 9.21b | 5.86c | 27.35b | 0.29c | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 8.76a | 1.22d | 7.50a | 0.85e | 29.61a | 3.65e | 0.45e | 25.25a |
2 m | 5.51c | 7.32b | 28.45b | 0.54d | |||||
3 m | 3.51c | 2.49d | 22.83d | 1.10b | |||||
平均 | 5.93b | 5.77c | 26.96c | 0.70c |
Tab. 5 Analysis results of soil available p content in the tea-walnut intercropping garden
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤的速效磷 Available P of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 12.12a | 1.80e | 7.50a | 2.21e | 30.26a | 3.19d | 0.17d | 34.39a |
2 m | 8.25c | 7.04b | 25.90c | 0.35b | |||||
3 m | 7.26d | 3.05d | 25.90c | 0.35b | |||||
平均 | 9.21b | 5.86c | 27.35b | 0.29c | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 8.76a | 1.22d | 7.50a | 0.85e | 29.61a | 3.65e | 0.45e | 25.25a |
2 m | 5.51c | 7.32b | 28.45b | 0.54d | |||||
3 m | 3.51c | 2.49d | 22.83d | 1.10b | |||||
平均 | 5.93b | 5.77c | 26.96c | 0.70c |
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point- walnut distance | 土壤的速效钾 Available K of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 166.27c | 155.29e | 505.02b | 446.43e | 439.11a | 169.94e | 479.39a | 201.06e |
2 m | 277.97a | 541.65a | 404.31b | 351.21c | |||||
3 m | 162.61d | 461.08d | 331.07d | 347.55d | |||||
平均 | 202.28b | 502.58c | 391.50c | 392.72b | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 169.93c | 140.64e | 475.73a | 406.14d | 468.40a | 162.61e | 288.95b | 168.57e |
2 m | 287.12a | 475.73a | 417.13b | 182.75d | |||||
3 m | 152.33d | 417.13c | 340.23d | 303.60a | |||||
平均 | 203.13b | 456.20b | 408.59c | 258.43c |
Tab. 6 Analysis results of soil available potassium content of the tea-walnut intercropping garden
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point- walnut distance | 土壤的速效钾 Available K of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1 m | 166.27c | 155.29e | 505.02b | 446.43e | 439.11a | 169.94e | 479.39a | 201.06e |
2 m | 277.97a | 541.65a | 404.31b | 351.21c | |||||
3 m | 162.61d | 461.08d | 331.07d | 347.55d | |||||
平均 | 202.28b | 502.58c | 391.50c | 392.72b | |||||
20~40 | 1 m | 169.93c | 140.64e | 475.73a | 406.14d | 468.40a | 162.61e | 288.95b | 168.57e |
2 m | 287.12a | 475.73a | 417.13b | 182.75d | |||||
3 m | 152.33d | 417.13c | 340.23d | 303.60a | |||||
平均 | 203.13b | 456.20b | 408.59c | 258.43c |
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤中的交换性钙 Exchangeable calcium of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1m | 814.36a | 706.66b | 800.14a | 530.12d | 980.95a | 603.60e | 2585.34a | 654.89e |
2m | 629.47d | 660.10b | 912.25b | 2109.91b | |||||
3m | 602.04e | 434.18e | 750.90d | 1283.98d | |||||
平均 | 681.96c | 631.47c | 881.37c | 1993.08c | |||||
20~40 | 1m | 695.57a | 638.89e | 590.75a | 482.21b | 590.05a | 395.40d | 1659.91c | 312.54e |
2m | 683.75b | 372.16e | 571.45b | 1934.80a | |||||
3m | 649.30c | 459.88d | 388.60e | 1617.15d | |||||
平均 | 676.21d | 474.26c | 516.70c | 1737.29b |
Tab. 7 Analysis results of soil exchange calcium content of the tea- walnut intercropping garden
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤中的交换性钙 Exchangeable calcium of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1m | 814.36a | 706.66b | 800.14a | 530.12d | 980.95a | 603.60e | 2585.34a | 654.89e |
2m | 629.47d | 660.10b | 912.25b | 2109.91b | |||||
3m | 602.04e | 434.18e | 750.90d | 1283.98d | |||||
平均 | 681.96c | 631.47c | 881.37c | 1993.08c | |||||
20~40 | 1m | 695.57a | 638.89e | 590.75a | 482.21b | 590.05a | 395.40d | 1659.91c | 312.54e |
2m | 683.75b | 372.16e | 571.45b | 1934.80a | |||||
3m | 649.30c | 459.88d | 388.60e | 1617.15d | |||||
平均 | 676.21d | 474.26c | 516.70c | 1737.29b |
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤中的交换性镁 Exchangeable magnesium of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1m | 39.34a | 21.69d | 29.56a | 4.99e | 146.14a | 29.55e | 103.34a | 13.69e |
2m | 24.23c | 25.69b | 140.70b | 68.76c | |||||
3m | 11.42e | 17.03d | 86.60d | 68.38d | |||||
平均 | 25.00b | 24.09c | 95.64c | 80.16b | |||||
20~40 | 1m | 37.56a | 18.39d | 17.91a | 6.99e | 126.88b | 38.23e | 119.10a | 10.58e |
2m | 28.95b | 16.43b | 136.48a | 99.07b | |||||
3m | 14.61e | 10.66d | 88.72d | 66.94d | |||||
平均 | 27.04c | 15.00c | 117.36c | 95.04c |
Tab. 8 Analysis results of soil exchange magnesium content of the tea-walnut intercropping garden
土壤深度 Soil depth/cm | 取样点-核桃间距 Sampling point-walnut distance | 土壤中的交换性镁 Exchangeable magnesium of the soil/(mg?kg-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 a | 10 a | 15 a | 30 a | ||||||
间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | 间作 | 单作 | ||
0~20 | 1m | 39.34a | 21.69d | 29.56a | 4.99e | 146.14a | 29.55e | 103.34a | 13.69e |
2m | 24.23c | 25.69b | 140.70b | 68.76c | |||||
3m | 11.42e | 17.03d | 86.60d | 68.38d | |||||
平均 | 25.00b | 24.09c | 95.64c | 80.16b | |||||
20~40 | 1m | 37.56a | 18.39d | 17.91a | 6.99e | 126.88b | 38.23e | 119.10a | 10.58e |
2m | 28.95b | 16.43b | 136.48a | 99.07b | |||||
3m | 14.61e | 10.66d | 88.72d | 66.94d | |||||
平均 | 27.04c | 15.00c | 117.36c | 95.04c |
[1] | 骆耀平 . 茶树栽培学[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008. |
[2] |
刘相东, 毕彩虹, 谭建平 , 等. 栗茶间作与覆草对茶树生长环境和茶叶品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016,44(34):26-27.
DOI URL |
[3] | 张正群, 田月月, 高树文 , 等. 茶园间作芳香植物罗勒和紫苏对茶园生态系统影响的研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2016,36(4):389-395. |
[4] | 杨海滨, 李中林, 徐泽 , 等. 间作绿肥对幼龄茶园土壤锌及养分含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(17):99-103. |
[5] |
侯文广, 江聪世, 熊庆文 , 等. 基于GIS的土壤质量评价研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2003,28(1):61-64.
DOI URL |
[6] |
崔翠, 蔡靖, 张硕新 . 核桃根系分泌物化感物质的分离与鉴定[J]. 林业科学, 2013,49(2):54-60.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Shann J R, Blum U . The uptake of ferulic and phydroxybenzoic acids by Cucumis sativus[J]. Phytochemistry, 1987,26(11):2959-2964.
DOI URL |
[8] |
黄敏, 吴金水, 黄巧云 , 等. 土壤磷素微生物作用的研究进展[J]. 生态环境, 2003,12(3):366-370.
DOI URL |
[9] |
徐畅, 高明 . 土壤中镁的化学行为及生物有效性研究进展[J]. 微量元素与健康研究, 2007,24(5):51-54.
DOI URL |
[10] |
杨冬雪, 钟珍梅, 陈剑侠 , 等. 福建省茶园土壤养分状况评价[J]. 海峡科学, 2010,26(6):129-131.
DOI URL |
[1] | YE Jianghua,HU Wenwen,ZHANG Qi,ZHANG Bo,WANG Peng,LUO Shengcai,WANG Haibin,JIA Xiaoli,HE Haibin. Correlation Between Soil Characteristics of Tea Plantations and the Growth and Fresh Leaf Quality of Wuyi Tea (Camellia sinensis cv. Shuixian) [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(9): 1838-1846. |
[2] | JIAO Wenwen,NIAN Bo,CHEN Lijiao,LIU Qianting,JIANG Bin,ZHANG Zhengyan,LIU Mingli,Ma Yan,ZHAO Ming. Comparison of Biochemical Components and Antioxidant Activities among Sun-dried Green Tea Produced by Fresh Leaves of Bush and Arbor Tree [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(9): 1897-1904. |
[3] | XIAO Tujian,MA Yuhua,YUAN Qifeng,XIE Pu,MAO Yongya,YAN Jiawen,LIAO Shiqin. Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis of Rhythms Clock Output Gene HpGI from Hylocereus polyrhizus [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1298-1304. |
[4] | MA Linlong,CAO Dan,LIU Yanli,JIN Xiaofang. Evaluation of Adaptability of Different Tea Cultivars in Hubei Based on Principal Components Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1335-1346. |
[5] | ZHANG Xiang,WANG Congming,NIE Congning,LI Shunyu,XU Yifan,XIE Anran,DU Xiao. Comparison of Volatile Components and Aroma Characterization in Sichuan Black Tea and Qimen Black Tea [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(7): 1440-1449. |
[6] | WANG Mengxin,WU Guohuo,CUI Lin,HAN Baoyu. Enzyme Activity Characteristics and Expression of Cu/Zn-SOD Gene in Tea Flowers [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1167-1173. |
[7] | XUE Yang,LIANG Juzhi,SU Shaofeng,YAO Xiaolan,WANG Xiaoyan,LIN Zhipan,XUE Yanwen. Changes of Vegetation and Soil Nutrient in Different Forests after Logging Banin Tropical Coastal Area of Hainan Island [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(6): 1273-1278. |
[8] | SHI Dongjie,FANG Yiming,ZHU Hongying,ZHAO Jing,CHU Zhong. Comparative Study on Characterization and Physical and Chemical Properties of Mallotus peltatus Powder with Different Particle Sizes [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(5): 1030-1040. |
[9] | WANG Jun,DUAN Ruijun,HUANG Shengzhuo,HONG Shaoyou,MEI Wenli,DAI Haofu. Wood Anatomy Research of Four Plants in Xisha Islands [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(3): 603-608. |
[10] | WANG Ru,LIU Xianglin,ZHOU Zhiqiang,LI Yunyun,CHEN Yanhui,CHEN Jin,WANG Guo. Difference of Cadmium Speciations After Single or Mixd Application Ammonium Chloride and Tea Saponin in Soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(2): 409-416. |
[11] | WANG Haibin,CHEN Xiaoting,ZHAO Hu,WANG Yuhua,ZHANG Qingxu,WANG Peng,YE Jianghua,DING Li. The Autotoxicity of Tea Tree Rhizosphere Soil Chemicals and the Effect of Soil Microbial Diversity [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(9): 1847-1857. |
[12] | SU Fan,YANG Xiaobo,LI Donghai. The Classification Status of Wuzhishan Wild Tea Based on Morphological Features and psbA-trnH Chloroplast Encoding Gene Sequence [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(8): 1565-1570. |
[13] | HAN Shuquan,LUO Lina,FAN Jianxin,LIU Rong,HUANG Hai,ZHANG Yan,KANG Zhuanmiao,HE Fengping. Analysis of Quality Features and the Characteristic Volatile Compound of Macadamia Leaf Tea [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(8): 1645-1652. |
[14] | WU Yingxiang,YU Xuefang,ZHAN Xingdui,LI Xinxin,YANG Chao,ZONG Weixun,LI Yongyu. Antioxidant Activity of Methanol Extract from Melaleuca bracteata Leaves [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(7): 1367-1372. |
[15] | ZHAN Jie,LI Zhenwu,DENG Sufang,YING Zhaoyang. Interplanting Chamaecrista rotundifolia Improves the Ecological Environment of Tea Garden and Promotes the Growth of Tea Trees [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(6): 1055-1061. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||