Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 583-589.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.03.024
• Agricultural Product Processing, Preservation, Storage, Analysis and Detection • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Wei,WEI Rifeng,GUO Yaling()
Received:
2018-07-31
Revised:
2018-10-30
Online:
2019-03-15
Published:
2019-03-15
Contact:
GUO Yaling
WANG Wei,WEI Rifeng,GUO Yaling. Optimization of Rapid Detection of Volatile Compounds in Oolong Tea by Electronic Nose Sensors[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(3): 583-589.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.rdzwxb.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.03.024
气敏传感器阵列 Gas sensor array | 响应的敏感挥发性成分 Sensitive volatile components of response |
---|---|
s1 | 氨气、胺类 |
s2 | 硫化氢、硫化物 |
s3 | 氢气 |
s4 | 酒精、有机溶剂 |
s5 | 食物烹调过程中挥发气体 |
s6 | 甲烷、沼气、碳氢化合物 |
s7 | 可燃性气体 |
s8 | VOC(多用于环境气体污染检测) |
s9 | 氢氧化合物、汽油、煤油 |
s10 | 烷烃、可燃性气体 |
Tab. 1 Electronic nose sensors and the corresponding volatile components of iNose
气敏传感器阵列 Gas sensor array | 响应的敏感挥发性成分 Sensitive volatile components of response |
---|---|
s1 | 氨气、胺类 |
s2 | 硫化氢、硫化物 |
s3 | 氢气 |
s4 | 酒精、有机溶剂 |
s5 | 食物烹调过程中挥发气体 |
s6 | 甲烷、沼气、碳氢化合物 |
s7 | 可燃性气体 |
s8 | VOC(多用于环境气体污染检测) |
s9 | 氢氧化合物、汽油、煤油 |
s10 | 烷烃、可燃性气体 |
水平 Levels | 因素 Factors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
温度(A)Temperature/℃ | 时间(B) Time/min | 茶样量(C) Sample dosage/g | ||
1 | 60 | 45 | 1 | |
2 | 80 | 30 | 2 | |
3 | 100 | 15 | 3 |
Tab. 2 Factors and coded levels of the L9(34) orthogonal test
水平 Levels | 因素 Factors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
温度(A)Temperature/℃ | 时间(B) Time/min | 茶样量(C) Sample dosage/g | ||
1 | 60 | 45 | 1 | |
2 | 80 | 30 | 2 | |
3 | 100 | 15 | 3 |
试验序号 Test number | 水平 Levels | 传感器 Sensors | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | s1 | s2 | s3 | s4 | s5 | s6 | s7 | s8 | s9 | s10 | |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.21 | 1.91 | 1.06 | 1.01 | 1.12 | 1.36 | 1.15 | 1.28 | 1.27 | 1.33 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2.30 | 2.35 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 1.48 | 1.16 | 1.23 | 1.28 | 1.43 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2.34 | 2.58 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.10 | 1.53 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.47 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2.91 | 2.55 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 1.13 | 1.51 | 1.20 | 1.32 | 1.50 | 1.48 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.92 | 3.08 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.20 | 1.76 | 1.35 | 1.34 | 1.49 | 1.72 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2.21 | 1.94 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.08 | 1.31 | 1.10 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 1.27 |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4.28 | 3.79 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.35 | 2.10 | 1.62 | 1.60 | 2.05 | 2.06 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2.90 | 2.29 | 1.06 | 1.00 | 1.13 | 1.43 | 1.19 | 1.37 | 1.40 | 1.43 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3.49 | 3.61 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.27 | 2.06 | 1.51 | 1.47 | 1.60 | 1.98 |
Tab. 3 Results of the orthogonal test
试验序号 Test number | 水平 Levels | 传感器 Sensors | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | s1 | s2 | s3 | s4 | s5 | s6 | s7 | s8 | s9 | s10 | |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.21 | 1.91 | 1.06 | 1.01 | 1.12 | 1.36 | 1.15 | 1.28 | 1.27 | 1.33 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2.30 | 2.35 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 1.48 | 1.16 | 1.23 | 1.28 | 1.43 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2.34 | 2.58 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.10 | 1.53 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.47 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2.91 | 2.55 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 1.13 | 1.51 | 1.20 | 1.32 | 1.50 | 1.48 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.92 | 3.08 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.20 | 1.76 | 1.35 | 1.34 | 1.49 | 1.72 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2.21 | 1.94 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.08 | 1.31 | 1.10 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 1.27 |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4.28 | 3.79 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.35 | 2.10 | 1.62 | 1.60 | 2.05 | 2.06 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2.90 | 2.29 | 1.06 | 1.00 | 1.13 | 1.43 | 1.19 | 1.37 | 1.40 | 1.43 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3.49 | 3.61 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.27 | 2.06 | 1.51 | 1.47 | 1.60 | 1.98 |
Index | s1 | s2 | s3 | s4 | s5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | ||||||||||||||||
k1 | 2.28 | 3.13 | 2.44 | 2.28 | 2.75 | 2.05 | 1.04 | 1.06 | 1.05 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 1.11 | 1.20 | 1.11 | |||||||||||||||
k2 | 2.68 | 2.71 | 2.90 | 2.52 | 2.57 | 2.84 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.17 | |||||||||||||||
k3 | 3.56 | 2.68 | 3.18 | 3.23 | 2.71 | 3.15 | 1.08 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.02 | 1.06 | 1.25 | 1.15 | 1.22 | |||||||||||||||
R | 1.27 | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 0.17 | 1.10 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
Level | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | |||||||||||||||
Impact | A>C>B | C>A>B | A>B>C | C>A>B | A>C>B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Index | s6 | s7 | s8 | s9 | s10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | 空列 | A | B | C | 空列 | ||||||||||||||
k1 | 1.46 | 1.66 | 1.37 | 1.16 | 1.33 | 1.15 | 1.23 | 1.40 | 1.30 | 1.28 | 1.61 | 1.30 | 1.33 | 1.41 | 1.62 | 1.34 | 1.36 | |||||||||||||
k2 | 1.53 | 1.56 | 1.69 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.29 | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.34 | 1.41 | 1.39 | 1.46 | 1.29 | 1.49 | 1.53 | 1.63 | 1.36 | |||||||||||||
k3 | 1.87 | 1.64 | 1.80 | 1.44 | 1.26 | 1.38 | 1.48 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.68 | 1.38 | 1.61 | 1.19 | 1.82 | 1.57 | 1.75 | 1.30 | |||||||||||||
R | 0.41 | 0.10 | 0.43 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.40 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.15 | 0.41 | 0.10 | 0.41 | 0.07 | |||||||||||||
Level | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | |||||||||||||||
Impact | C>A>B | A>C>B | A>B>C | A>C>B | A>C>B |
Tab. 4 Range analysis of the orthogonal test results
Index | s1 | s2 | s3 | s4 | s5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | ||||||||||||||||
k1 | 2.28 | 3.13 | 2.44 | 2.28 | 2.75 | 2.05 | 1.04 | 1.06 | 1.05 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 1.11 | 1.20 | 1.11 | |||||||||||||||
k2 | 2.68 | 2.71 | 2.90 | 2.52 | 2.57 | 2.84 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.17 | |||||||||||||||
k3 | 3.56 | 2.68 | 3.18 | 3.23 | 2.71 | 3.15 | 1.08 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.02 | 1.06 | 1.25 | 1.15 | 1.22 | |||||||||||||||
R | 1.27 | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 0.17 | 1.10 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
Level | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | |||||||||||||||
Impact | A>C>B | C>A>B | A>B>C | C>A>B | A>C>B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Index | s6 | s7 | s8 | s9 | s10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | 空列 | A | B | C | 空列 | ||||||||||||||
k1 | 1.46 | 1.66 | 1.37 | 1.16 | 1.33 | 1.15 | 1.23 | 1.40 | 1.30 | 1.28 | 1.61 | 1.30 | 1.33 | 1.41 | 1.62 | 1.34 | 1.36 | |||||||||||||
k2 | 1.53 | 1.56 | 1.69 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.29 | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.34 | 1.41 | 1.39 | 1.46 | 1.29 | 1.49 | 1.53 | 1.63 | 1.36 | |||||||||||||
k3 | 1.87 | 1.64 | 1.80 | 1.44 | 1.26 | 1.38 | 1.48 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.68 | 1.38 | 1.61 | 1.19 | 1.82 | 1.57 | 1.75 | 1.30 | |||||||||||||
R | 0.41 | 0.10 | 0.43 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.40 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.15 | 0.41 | 0.10 | 0.41 | 0.07 | |||||||||||||
Level | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | A3 | B1 | C3 | |||||||||||||||
Impact | C>A>B | A>C>B | A>B>C | A>C>B | A>C>B |
阵列序号 Array sequence number | A | B | C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F值 | p值 | F值 | p值 | F值 | p值 | |
S1 | 96.917 | 0.000 | 14.910 | 0.000 | 31.973 | 0.000 |
S2 | 54.185 | 0.000 | 1.847 | 0.184 | 71.927 | 0.000 |
S3 | 27.944 | 0.000 | 7.063 | 0.005 | 1.079 | 0.359 |
S4 | 14.181 | 0.000 | 2.707 | 0.091 | 15.726 | 0.000 |
S5 | 28.888 | 0.000 | 4.979 | 0.018 | 13.786 | 0.000 |
S6 | 30.102 | 0.000 | 1.767 | 0.197 | 31.572 | 0.000 |
S7 | 35.430 | 0.000 | 3.608 | 0.046 | 21.896 | 0.000 |
S8 | 84.789 | 0.000 | 13.255 | 0.000 | 6.708 | 0.006 |
S9 | 36.371 | 0.000 | 14.437 | 0.000 | 20.375 | 0.000 |
S10 | 36.487 | 0.000 | 1.804 | 0.190 | 33.750 | 0.000 |
Tab. 5 Multivariate variance analysis of the orthogonal test results
阵列序号 Array sequence number | A | B | C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F值 | p值 | F值 | p值 | F值 | p值 | |
S1 | 96.917 | 0.000 | 14.910 | 0.000 | 31.973 | 0.000 |
S2 | 54.185 | 0.000 | 1.847 | 0.184 | 71.927 | 0.000 |
S3 | 27.944 | 0.000 | 7.063 | 0.005 | 1.079 | 0.359 |
S4 | 14.181 | 0.000 | 2.707 | 0.091 | 15.726 | 0.000 |
S5 | 28.888 | 0.000 | 4.979 | 0.018 | 13.786 | 0.000 |
S6 | 30.102 | 0.000 | 1.767 | 0.197 | 31.572 | 0.000 |
S7 | 35.430 | 0.000 | 3.608 | 0.046 | 21.896 | 0.000 |
S8 | 84.789 | 0.000 | 13.255 | 0.000 | 6.708 | 0.006 |
S9 | 36.371 | 0.000 | 14.437 | 0.000 | 20.375 | 0.000 |
S10 | 36.487 | 0.000 | 1.804 | 0.190 | 33.750 | 0.000 |
[1] | 海铮, 王俊 . 电子鼻信号特征提取与传感器优化的研究[J]. 传感技术学报, 2006,19(3):606-610. |
[2] | 原帅, 张娟, 刘美娟 , 等. 樱桃含糖量的无损检测实验研究[J]. 分析试验室, 2015,34(7):760-764. |
[3] | 鲍俊宏, 薛大为 . 茶叶贮藏时间电子鼻检测方法[J]. 电子世界, 2017(1):85-86. |
[4] | 虞培力, 赵粼, 王晞丞 , 等. 人工智能对龙井茶等级识别研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(2):260-263. |
[5] | 张红梅, 何玉静, 李祥付 . 信阳毛尖茶品质和化学成分快速检测方法[J]. 河南科学, 2014,32(5):746-751. |
[6] | 何鲁南, 赵苗苗, 蔡昌敏 , 等. 电子鼻技术对不同贮藏地的普洱茶香气分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018,31(4):717-724. |
[7] | Dutta R, Hines E L, Gardner J W , et al. Tea quality prediction using a tin oxide-based electronic nose: an artificial intelligence approach[J]. Sensors & Actuators B Chemical, 2003,94(2):228-237. |
[8] | 潘俊娴, 段玉伟, 蒋玉兰 , 等. 福鼎白茶风味的电子鼻和电子舌评价[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017,38(12):25-30. |
[9] |
敖存, 龚淑英, 张俊 , 等. 茶叶香气质量的电子鼻检测条件筛选研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013,41(3):1253-1256.
DOI URL |
[10] | 高林, 秦子涵, 赵文婷 , 等. 电子鼻区分不同品质的普洱茶[J]. 中国食品学报, 2017,17(6):206-212. |
[11] | 吕海鹏, 钟秋生, 施江 , 等. 普洱茶挥发性成分指纹图谱研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014,34(1):71-78. |
[12] | 林海明, 杜子芳 . 主成分分析综合评价应该注意的问题[J]. 统计研究, 2013,30(8):25-31. |
[13] |
陈正武, 陈娟, 龚雪 , 等. 28份贵州茶树种质资源的生化成分多样性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015,28(4):1517-1523.
DOI URL |
[14] | 梁奇峰, 陈秀玲, 侯红娜 . 红外光谱结合主成分分析识别不同产地单枞茶[J]. 广东化工, 2015,42(21):33-34. |
[15] | Yu H C, Wang J . Discrimination of Long Jing green-tea grade by electronic nose[J]. Sensors and Actuators B, 2007,122:134-140. |
[16] | 于慧春, 李欣, 王俊 . 电子鼻信号优化在茶叶贮藏时间识别中应用[ C]// 2009年近代农产品和食品加工技术及装备学术年会论文集. 北京: 中国机械工程学会, 2009: 161-168. |
[17] | 史波林, 赵镭, 支瑞聪 , 等. 应用电子鼻判别西湖龙井茶香气品质[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011,27(2):302-306. |
[1] | LIN Xia,CHEN Zheng,ZHU Yujing,LI Huimin,DENG Wenqiong,LIU Bo. Heterogeneity Analysis of Volatile Components of Fresh Leaves of Three Perilla Plants [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(3): 586-595. |
[2] | HU Jian,LING Ruimei,LI Ping,YAN Hongbin,LIU Yuanyuan,YANG Yi,YANG Quan,WU Lianzhang,ZHANG Zhongkai,YAN Jian. Effect on Volatile Components of Amomum tsao-ko by Four Different Preprocessing Models [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(4): 773-780. |
[3] | JIN Shan,HAN Liwei,YE Naixing,WANG Wei,HUANG Huoshui,LIU Wei. Analysis on Volatiles of Oolong Tea Varieties Induced by Empoasca sp. [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(3): 576-582. |
[4] | ZHOU Xianglu,LYU Zhencheng,XU Liangxiong,PENG Yonghong. Study on Volatile Components of Croton crassifolius Leaf by HS- SPME-GC-MS [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(2): 380-387. |
[5] | YOU Fangning, CHEN Shousong, ZHOU Ziwei, LI Xinlei, HAO Zhilong, SUN Yun. Effect of Flavor Components on Different Illumination Time During Withering Process in Tieguanyin Tea [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(9): 1856-1862. |
[6] | LIN Kui, HUANG Zhi, XU Yong. Optimization of the Light Environment of Lettuce in Growth Period Based on Gray Relational Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(8): 1483-1492. |
[7] | LIN Kui', HUANG Zhi, XU Yong', LIN Tiandi, YANG Hao, LUO Qing. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of the Optimal Lighting Mode for Lettuce Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(4): 702-708. |
[8] | LIN Xia , CHEN Zheng , LIU Bo, ZHU Yujing , LI Huimin. Analysis of the Volatile Components from Lagerstroemia indica with Five Different Flower Colours by Solid-phase Microextraction [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(10): 2074-2082. |
[9] | CHENG Yuan LIU Zhongyi WU Jijun YU Yuanshan XU Yujuan XIAO Gengsheng. Screening and Stability of Neutral Sweet Corn Beverage Thickener [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(8): 1553-1559. |
[10] | ZHENG Min HUANG Xiaobing PENG Zheng LI Jihua LIN Lijing. Analysis of Volatile Components in Gan-pu Tea [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(4): 758-762. |
[11] | LIU Jianfu , GAO Junjie , TIAN Aolei , HUANG Shousheng , ZHANG Bin , XU Maoxing. Analysis of Content and Composition of Amino Acid in Wuyi Rock Tea#br# [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38(2): 283-287. |
[12] | YU Miao DONG Wenjiang HU Rongsuo ZHANG Dongjie ZHAO Jianping. Volatile Components of Roasted Coffee Beans Based on HS-SPME/GC-MS and Electronic Nose in [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(9): 1826-1835. |
[13] | YANG Jinsong CAI Jinhong KANG Liru TAN Haisheng. Jackfruit Jam [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(9): 1836-1840. |
[14] | JING Wei, SU Zipeng, LIN Lijing . Volatile Profiling of Macadamia Nuts during Roasting [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(6): 1224-1231. |
[15] | YANG Baogang PAN Yonggui CHEN Wenxue ZHONG Qiuping ZHANG Weimin HUANG Wuyang. SPME/GC-MS Technology to Analyze the Effects of Different Vacuum Drying Temperature on Aroma Components of Hainan Papaya Powder [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(11): 2222-2229. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||