Allelopathy of Water Extracts from Cassava Organs and Decomposing Products to Rigidoporus lignosus of Hevea brasiliensis

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.01.018

Abstract

Abstract:

The allelopathic effect of water extracts from the root, stem or leaf of cassava and the decomposing products on the Rigidoporus lignosus (Klotzsch) Imaz. of rubber tree at three concentrations and different days after treatment were studied using the mycelial growth rate method. The water extracts from the root of cassava could significantly promote the growth of Rigidoporus lignosus (Klotzsch) Imaz. between the 2-5th day after treatment, but there was no significant difference among the three concentrations. The promotion effect of the three concentrations extracts from the leaf was significant at the 2th or 5th day after treatment, while the promotion effect to the 10 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL extracts was significant at the 3th day or 4th day. The allelopathic promotion effect of the extracts from the stem was not obvious at the 2th or 3th day, while there was a significantly positive effect of the 100 mg/mL extracts at the 4th and of 1000 mg/mL extracts at the 5th day. The allelopathic inhibition effect of the extracts from the root decomposing product increased gradually with the concentration increased. The effect was significant when the concentration increased to 200 mg/mL. With the concentration increased, the inhibition effect of the extracts from the leaf decomposing product decreased gradually. The effect was no significant when the concentration increased to 200 mg/mL. The inhibition effect of the extracts from the stem decomposing product was significant.

Key words: cassava organ, decomposing product, water extracts, Rigidoporus lignosus (Klotzsch) Imaz. of Hevea brasiliensis, allelopathic effect

YAN Wenjing,LIU Zifan,ZHANG Tingting,SU Jianmin,ZHAO Xuemei. Allelopathy of Water Extracts from Cassava Organs and Decomposing Products to Rigidoporus lignosus of Hevea brasiliensis[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(1): 123-129.

Figures/Tables 6

References 31

[1]	鞠岩峰, 张剑, 吴润 , 等. 天然橡胶种植现状及市场需求预测分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(1):152-157. DOI URL
[2]	张慧坚, 方佳, 孙好勤 . 我国热带作物产业发展现状及趋势分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2010,22(5):173-179. DOI URL
[3]	蔡吉苗, 陈瑶, 潘羡心 , 等. 海南橡胶树棒孢霉落叶病病情调查与病原鉴定[J]. 热带农业科学, 2008,28(5):1-7, 10. DOI URL
[4]	杨国锋 . 加蓬的胶粮间作系统[J]. 世界热带农业信息, 2000(6):1-2.
[5]	邬若兰, 尹维, 廖晓兰 . 植物化感作用防治植物病害研究进展[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2013,3(7):42-44, 62.
[6]	宋文超, 贾俊英, 云兴福 . 西芹鲜根浸提液对黄瓜枯萎病菌化感作用机理的研究-鲜根浸提物处理后黄瓜枯萎病菌形态及孢子生长的变化[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报, 2010,31(3):100-105.
[7]	杨玉锋, 姚战军, 李保利 . 西芹根水浸提液对西瓜枯萎病菌的化感作用[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011,39(6):224-225. DOI URL
[8]	刘顺湖, 吕秀红 . 金乡大蒜秸秆浸提液对黄瓜灰霉病菌抑制效果的研究[J]. 济宁学院学报, 2014,35(6):5-10. DOI URL
[9]	齐永志 . 根系化感物质与病原菌在草莓连作障碍中的协同作用研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2008.
[10]	陈建新, 刘家运, 刘翠珍 , 等. 不同处理方法对木薯氢氰酸含量的影响[J]. 广东畜牧兽医科技, 1992(4):13-14.
[11]	何翠薇, 陈玉萍, 覃洁萍 , 等. 木薯茎杆及叶化学成分初步研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2011,22(4):908-909. DOI URL
[12]	李珊珊, 戴好富, 赵友兴 , 等. 海南产木薯茎化学成分研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2012,20(2):197-200. DOI URL
[13]	柳红娟, 黄洁, 刘子凡 , 等. 木薯器官浸提液对香蕉尖孢镰刀菌的抑菌作用[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,31(3):556-561.
[14]	刘培培, 刘子凡, 刘乔颖 , 等. 木薯器官及其混合物水浸提液对橡胶树棒孢霉落叶病病菌的化感作用[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018,39(2):338-342. DOI URL
[15]	Tran Van Canh, 张开明. 不同杀菌剂防治橡胶树白根病的研究[J]. 热带作物译丛, 1984(4):19-22.
[16]	秦立金, 曹巨峰, 韩伟秋 , 等. 黄瓜和西芹间作对黄瓜生长及枯萎病发生的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018,26(5):684-692. DOI URL
[17]	王桂清, 马迪 . 室内药效试验方法的比较[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017,45(19):175-178. DOI URL
[18]	鲁海菊, 张晓永, 江涛 , 等. 抗枇杷根腐病病菌的枇杷内生木霉P3.9菌株生物学特性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(2):53-57. DOI URL
[19]	韩旭 . 大蒜秸秆腐解物化感作用研究及化感物质鉴定[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.
[20]	田给林 . 连作草莓土壤酚酸类物质的化感作用及其生物调控研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
[21]	孔垂华, 胡飞, 王朋 . 植物化感(相生相克)作用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016.
[22]	邬彩霞, 刘苏娇, 赵国琦 . 黄花草木樨水浸提液中潜在化感物质的分离、鉴定[J]. 草业学报, 2014,23(5):184-192. DOI URL
[23]	Wallenstein M D, Hess A M, Lewis M R , et al. Decomposition of aspen leaf litter results in unique metabolomes when decomposed under different tree species[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2010,42:484-490.
[24]	程莹, 白寿发, 庄敬华 , 等. 甜瓜残茬腐解物对镰孢枯萎病的助长作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(8):217-221.
[25]	Blagbrough I S , Bayoumi S A L, Rowanet M G , et al. Cassava: An appraisal of its phytochemistry and its biotechnological prospects[J]. Phytochemistry, 2010,71(17-18):1940-1951.
[26]	谭秀梅, 王华田, 孔令刚 , 等. 杨树人工林连作土壤中酚酸积累规律及对土壤微生物的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2008,43(1):14-19.
[27]	刘建国 . 新疆棉花长期连作的土壤环境效应及其化感作用的研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2008.
[28]	Orhan D D, Ozcelik B, Ozgen S , et al. Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral activities of some flavonoids[J]. Microbiologial Research, 2010,165(6):496-504. DOI URL PMID
[29]	吴会芹, 董林林, 王倩 . 玉米、小麦秸秆水浸提液对蔬菜种子的化感作用[J]. 华北农学报, 2009,24(12):140-143. DOI URL
[30]	Dong S Q, Ma Y Q, Wu H W , et al. Stimulatory effects of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on seed germination of Orobanche minor Sm[J]. Allelopathy Journal, 2012,30(2):247-258.
[31]	韩燕, 云兴福 . 西芹根水浸提液对黄瓜枯萎病菌的化感作用[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,28(4):112-115. DOI URL

浓度 Concentration/(mg·mL^-1)	处理后2 d 2 days after treatment	处理后3 d 3 days after treatment	处理后4 d 4 days after treatment	处理后5 d 5 days after treatment
0（CK）	0.00±3.31^bA	0.00±2.16^bA	0.00±2.16^bA	0.00±1.45^bA
10	31.00±8.20^aA	17.07±0.79^aAB	16.47±5.01^aAB	12.25±3.14^aB
100	30.00±3.31^aA	14.07±3.24^aB	18.85±1.87^aB	16.26±4.05^aB
1000	28.75±4.51^aA	13.47±2.10^aB	19.02±1.91^aB	14.25±2.87^aB

浓度 Concentration/(mg·mL^-1)	处理后2 d 2 days after treatment	处理后3 d 3 days after treatment	处理后4 d 4 days after treatment	处理后5 d 5 days after treatment
0（CK）	0.00±3.31^bA	0.00±2.16^bA	0.00±2.16^bA	0.00±1.45^bA
10	31.00±8.20^aA	17.07±0.79^aAB	16.47±5.01^aAB	12.25±3.14^aB
100	30.00±3.31^aA	14.07±3.24^aB	18.85±1.87^aB	16.26±4.05^aB
1000	28.75±4.51^aA	13.47±2.10^aB	19.02±1.91^aB	14.25±2.87^aB

浓度 Concentration/(mg·mL^-1)	处理后2 d 2 days after treatment	处理后3 d 3 days after treatment	处理后4 d 4 days after treatment	处理后5 d 5 days after treatment
0（CK）	0.00±3.31^bA	0.00±2.16^aA	0.00±2.16^bcA	0.00±1.45^aA
10	7.51±0.90^aA	5.39±2.34^aA	4.75±7.10^abA	3.56±0.17^aA
100	8.75±0.66^aA	7.49±2.56^aA	6.96±3.27^aA	3.79±0.48^aA
1000	3.75±0.72^abA	-4.97±8.30^aAB	-2.56±0.44^cAB	-5.02±4.93^bB

浓度 Concentration/(mg·mL^-1)	处理后2 d 2 days after treatment	处理后3 d 3 days after treatment	处理后4 d 4 days after treatment	处理后5 d 5 days after treatment
0（CK）	0.00±3.31^bA	0.00±2.16^aA	0.00±2.16^bcA	0.00±1.45^aA
10	7.51±0.90^aA	5.39±2.34^aA	4.75±7.10^abA	3.56±0.17^aA
100	8.75±0.66^aA	7.49±2.56^aA	6.96±3.27^aA	3.79±0.48^aA
1000	3.75±0.72^abA	-4.97±8.30^aAB	-2.56±0.44^cAB	-5.02±4.93^bB

浓度Concentration/(mg·mL^-1)	处理后2 d 2 days after treatment	处理后3 d 3 days after treatment	处理后4 d 4 days after treatment	处理后5 d 5 days after treatment
0（CK）	0.00±3.31^cA	0.00±2.16^bA	0.00±2.16^bA	0.00±1.45^cA
10	58.75±1.25^aA	20.71±2.22^aB	19.16±2.10^aB	3.56±1.14^bC
100	32.50±2.17^bA	19.69±0.78^aB	14.07±0.90^aC	9.24±0.19^aD
1000	17.50±9.01^bA	10.02±5.86^abB	5.39±1.16^bB	4.73±0.48^bB